Arsenic in Drinking Water in Taiwan* - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Arsenic in Drinking Water in Taiwan*

Description:

pocket dosimeter. Monitors For Exposure / Dose. Thermal Stress. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ... Personal noise dosimeter. time-integrated dose. Noise-intensity analyzer ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: sphU
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Arsenic in Drinking Water in Taiwan*


1
Arsenic in Drinking Water in Taiwan
  • Ecologic study of 243 townships (11.4 million
    residents)
  • National survey of arsenic in 80,000 wells
    conducted between 1974 and 1976.
  • Arsenic levels for each well grouped into 6
    categories to reflect precision of method
  • Percentage of wells in each category for each
    township used for analysis

Guo et al. Arsenic in Drinking Water and
Incidence of Urinary Cancers. Epidemiology
19978545-550.
2
Drinking Water Turbidity in PhiladelphiaMeasurem
ent Surrogates for Exposure
  • Ecologic study Childrens hospital visits for
    Gastrointestinal Illness in Philadelphia
  • Turbidity for 5 years (1989-1993)
  • Collected to meet EPA requirements
  • A surrogate for microbial contamination and
    effectiveness of water treatment
  • Daily mean from 3 water treatment plants serving
    different areas
  • Time series analysis adjusted for season,
    temperature day-of-week with lagged exposure

Schwartz et al. Drinking Water Turbidity and
Pediatric Hospital Use for Gastrointestinal
Illness in Philadelphia, Epidemiology
19978615-620.
3
Proximity to Hazardous Waste SitesGeographic
Surrogates for Exposure
  • Population mothers of birth defect cases and
    controls in California
  • Residential histories during periconceptual
    period
  • Location of 764 hazardous waste sites identified
  • 105 National Priority List sites identified
    information on site-related contamination
    collected (media contaminated, chemicals,
    clean-up, etc)
  • Census tract, latitude/longitude boundaries
    identified
  • Analysis census tract residence within 1 mile

Croen et al. Maternal residential Proximity to
Hazardous Waste Sites and Risk for Selected
Congenital Malformations. Epidemiology
19978347-354.
4
Exposure Assessment Methods Protective (versus
Predictive) Assessments
  • Protective assessments are designed for initial
    investigations as a screening tool, and for
    risk-based corrective actions.
  • General criterion is conservatism, e.g., use of
    worst-case scenario for potential exposure and
    risk.
  • Often estimates exposure to most-exposed
    individual, MEI, a hypothetical individual.
  • Use of generic parameters
  • Often criticized as overly conservative
  • Protective exposure assumptions often used in
    prospective risk assessments

Applications of exposure assessment
5
Conservative Assumptions
Hazardous waste site remediation
Lifetime air pollution exposure
6
Predictive Assessments
  • Predictive assessments are designed to assess
    actual exposure (risk) to population for use in
    epidemiological, dose-response studies.
  • Uses reasonable case scenario, most likely
    scenarios
  • Requires demographic information
  • Requires site-specific parameters

A major difference exists between predictive and
protective assessments
7
Components of Environmental Exposure Assessment
  • Determine and characterize source(s)
  • Identify exposure pathway(s) environmental
    fate
  • Estimate concentration at human/environment
    boundary
  • Perform integrated exposure analysis
  • Identify exposed population
  • Uncertainty analysis (throughout)
  • Evaluate significance

Transport and transformation
Human contact exposure
Contaminant source emissions
Accumulation in environment
Potential dose to body
Internal dose
Early expression of disease
Health Effect
Biologically effective dose
8
Uncertainty analysis variability versus
uncertainty
  • Uncertainty represents a lack of knowledge about
    factors affecting exposure or risk, whereas
    variability arises from true heterogeneity across
    people, places, or time
  • Uncertainty can lead to inaccurate or biased
    estimates, whereas variability can affect the
    precision of the estimates and the degree to
    which they can be generalized

9
Evaluation of significance of estimated exposures
1. Comparison to Exposure Limits Consensus,
regulatory, and/or guideline levels are available
for many agents. Occupational standards (all
for airborne contaminants) ACGIH TLVs OSHA
PELs NIOSH RELs, IDLH Community
standards EPA NAAQS (ambient air
contaminants) FDA ADI (food contaminants) EPA
MCLs (drinking water contaminants) WHO
guidelines (various media)
2. Estimation of Individual and Population Risks
Risk Assessment
10
Chemical And Biological Contaminants In Workplace
Air
11
Similarly Exposed Group (SEG) Of Workers
  • . . . A GROUP OF WORKERS DEFINED BY THE
    EXPECTATION THAT, ON AVERAGE, THEY WILL BE
    EXPOSED TO THE SAME CONTAMINANT COMING FROM THE
    SAME SOURCES.

12
Variability Of Exposure
OEL
MEDIAN
LOG-NORMAL DISTRIBUTION
FREQUENCY
TWA EXPOSURE INTENSITY FOR THE SEG STUDIED
13
Technical Methods For Air Sampling In Workplaces
  • FIXED POINT, STATIC or AREA SAMPLING now mostly
    absent in developed countries (with notable
    exceptions).
  • PERSONAL SAMPLING NOW CONSIDERED TO BE THE
    NORM small personal sampling devices worn on
    the lapel or jacket in the breathing zone.

14
The IOM Personal Inhalable Aerosol Sampler
15
The Photoionization Real-time Detector For
Organic Vapors
16
Ionizing Radiation Concept Of Radiation Dose
  • DOSE the quantity of radiation energy absorbed
    by a given mass.
  • SIEVERT (Sv) the amount of absorbed radiation,
    weighted according to the biological
    effectiveness of the radiation

17
Typical Radiation Exposures
  • Radiologists (X and ? ) 0.7 mSv/year
  • Flight crews (X and ? ) 1.7 mSv/year
  • Nuclear power plant workers (PWR) (? ) 4.9
    mSv/year
  • Dentists (X) 0.7 mSv/year
  • Nuclear power plant workers (PWR) (neutron) 0.5
    mSv/year
  • Uranium mining (? ) 11 mSv/year
  • (Note OEL 50 mSv/year)

18
Monitors For Exposure / Dose
  • Activity ratemeters-
  • ionization chambers.
  • Geiger-Mueller counters, etc.
  • scintillation counters.
  • Personal dosimeters-
  • film badge (amount of darkening dose).
  • pocket dosimeter.

19
Thermal Stress
  • PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
  • temperature
  • humidity
  • ambient wind
  • work rate
  • HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
  • work rate
  • heart rate
  • oral temperature
  • level of hydration

20
Noise
  • The physical intensity of sound or noise is
    expressed in units of sound pressure level.
  • But the decibel (dB) scale is used to contract
    (logarithmically) the range of numbers we would
    have to measure.

21
Measurement of Noise
  • Sound level meter (SLM)
  • instantaneous dBA (or dBC) levels
  • Personal noise dosimeter
  • time-integrated dose
  • Noise-intensity analyzer
  • magnitude and direction of noise
  • Narrow-band analyzer
  • to investigate noise sources, to indicate
    frequency content

22
Vibration
  • PROPERTIES
  • displacement
  • velocity
  • acceleration
  • resonance
  • MEASUREMENT
  • accelerometers (piezoelectric) to measure
    acceleration in both magnitude and direction

23
Injury Exposure To Risk Of Accidents By Truck
Drivers
  • Technical factors (technical review)
  • type of vehicle
  • hours driven
  • seasonal
  • geographical, etc.
  • Human factors (questionnaire)
  • education and training
  • personality
  • state of health
  • experience, etc.

24
Injury Exposure To Risk Of Repetitive Strain
Injury
  • Technical factors (technical review)
  • exposure situation
  • hours exposed
  • exposure frequency
  • Human factors (questionnaire)-
  • education and training
  • personality
  • state of health

25
Other Exposures . . . .
  • SPECIAL PROBLEMS IN ASSESSING EXPOSURES
    THROUGH THE DERMAL AND INGESTION ROUTES
  • WHAT ARE RELEVANT INDICES OF EXPOSURE?

26
Retrospective Exposure Assessment
  • . . . . . LOOKING BACKWARDS SO WE CAN PREDICT
    FORWARDS

27
Rationale
  • To re-construct past exposures
  • to provide more complete exposure histories in
    order to better perform epidemiologic studies for
    environment-related diseases that have very long
    time scales (e.g., some cancers).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com