GIM Journal Club: On or Off Target - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

GIM Journal Club: On or Off Target

Description:

Numerous RCT that prove benefit of ACEI (HOPE, SOLVD, SAVE) in ... Renal efferent arteriolar vasconstriction. Cardiac myocyte hypertrophy. Myocyte necrosis ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Ami977
Category:
Tags: gim | club | efferent | journal | target

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GIM Journal Club: On or Off Target


1
GIM Journal ClubOn or Off Target?
  • Telmisartan, Ramipril, or Both in Patients at
    High Risk for Vascular Events. N ENGL J MED 2008,
    3581547-1549.the ONTARGET Group
  • Amit Kakkar, R1
  • June 17th, 2008

2
Background
  • Numerous RCT that prove benefit of ACEI (HOPE,
    SOLVD, SAVE) in reducing rates of death, MI, CVA,
    and HF in pts w/ LVD, DM, or PVD.
  • ARBs proven to reduce death/hospitalization for
    HF patients unable to tolerate ACEI or already on
    one (CHARM, RESOLVD, RENAAL, Val-Heft)

3
Angiotensin II The Bad Guy
  • Some effects
  • Vasoconstriction
  • Salt/water retention (via aldosterone)
  • vasopressin/norepi release
  • Renal efferent arteriolar vasconstriction
  • Cardiac myocyte hypertrophy
  • Myocyte necrosis
  • Fibroblast proliferation, migration, and collagen
    production
  • Free O2 radicals
  • 2nd growth factors (TGF-beta, endothelin)
  • Vascular smooth muscle proliferation and
    hypertrophy

4
The HOPE Trial- Heart Outcomes Prevention
Evaluation
  • Inclusion Criteria agegt55, hx CAD, CVA, PVD, or
    DM one of the following (HTN, high TC, low HDL,
    tobacco use, microalbuminuria)
  • Exclusion HF, EF lt.4, on ACEI or vitamin E,
    uncontrolled HTN, nephropathy, MI/CVA within
    4weeks.
  • Trial terminated early at 4.5yrs due to outcomes
  • HOPE looked at highest risk patients, at 4.5yrs
    cardiovascular mortality in 8.1 and nonfatal MI
    4.8

5
Verdecchia et al. Do ARBs increase the risk of
MI. European Jouranl of Cardiology. 2005
6
Study Design - Goals
  • 1) examine if telmisartan (80mg qd) was not
    inferior to the ACEI ramipril (10mg qd)
  • 2) if combination of telmisartan ramipril was
    superior to ramipril alone in high risk patients
    with CVD or DM but no HF

7
Study Design
  • Overall, the ONTARGET program consists of 2
    large, randomized, double-blind, multicenter
    international trials
  • a principal trial
  • ONTARGET
  • parallel trial TRANSCEND

8
Study Design - Methods
  • Patients recruited at 733 centers in 40 countries
  • Data organized/analyzed by 3 coordinating
    centers.
  • Progress evaluated regularly by 3 centers
    Boehringer Ingelheim
  • Study outcomes abjudicated by central committee
    who were blinded to study group assignments.

9
Inclusion Criteria
10
Exclusion Criteria
11
Study Design - Methods
  • Run-In Period 29, 019 enrolled, but 11.7 were
    excluded at this point
  • 25,620 left for randomization
  • 8542 got telmisartan 80mg po qday
  • 8576 got ramipril 5mg po qday, then increased to
    10mg at 2wks
  • 8502 got combination
  • f/u visits at 6wks, 6months, then q6monthly

12
Endpoints
  • Primary endpoint death caused by CVD, acute MI,
    CVA, and hospitalization for HF
  • Secondary endpoints new HF, revascularization,
    new-onset DM2, angina, renal impairment/renal
    failure requiring HD, and new dx afib

13
(No Transcript)
14
Results
  • Similar characteristics in each treatment group
    (see Table 1)
  • 99.8 were followed until a primary event
    occurred or the end of the study

15
(No Transcript)
16
Results
  • No significant difference in of deaths between
    ramipril group and telmisartan group
  • Total number of deaths higher in the combination
    therapy group, but not significant
  • 2nd outcomes significant findings seen in renal
    dysfunction.

17
(No Transcript)
18
Discussion
  • Telmisartan not inferior to Ramipril for the
    primary outcome
  • High rates of adherence to both regimens
  • Similar population to reference study (HOPE)
  • Combination group showed decreased in BP 2 to
    3mmHg compared to ramipril, but result not
    significant (similar to VALIANT, but not CHARM)

19
Strengths
  • Large, multi-ethnic population
  • High adherence rates
  • Similar characteristics to comparator trial
    (HOPE)
  • SubGroup Analyses possible (Cardiac MRI trial)
  • Dosage regimen fixed

20
Concerns
  • Choice of ARB? Telmisartan ?
  • Reproducibility with other ACEI/ARBs
  • Variable dosing of ACEI (CHARM)
  • Role of pharma in overseeing results
  • Combo effect of ACE/ARBs? Potential?

21
References
  • Anderson C Rationale and design of the cardiac
    magnetic resonance imaging substudy of The
    ONTARGET Trial Programme. Clinical Trial,
    Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized
    Controlled TrialJ Int Med Res 2005.50A-57A.
  • Greenberg and Herman. Contemporary Diagnosis and
    Management of Heart Failure. Handbooks in Health
    Care Co. Newton, PA 2002.
  • Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study
    Investigators Effects of an ACEI on
    cardiovascular events in high risk patients. N
    ENG J MED 2000 342.
  • Verdecchia et al. Do ARBs increase the risk of
    MI. European Jouranl of Cardiology. 2005.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com