Rectal Cancer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Rectal Cancer

Description:

Rectal Cancer 1/5/11 Pre-Op Staging Useful info Depth of penetration through the rectal wall Presence or absence of mets to regional lymph nodes Presence of distant ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:272
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: Ter8112
Category:
Tags: cancer | rectal

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rectal Cancer


1
Rectal Cancer
  • 1/5/11

2
Pre-Op Staging
  • Useful info
  • Depth of penetration through the rectal wall
  • Presence or absence of mets to regional lymph
    nodes
  • Presence of distant mets
  • Diagnostic tools
  • Clinical exam
  • CT
  • MRI
  • ERUS
  • PET

3
Pre-Op Staging
  • Labs
  • CEA
  • LFTs
  • Baseline CXR

4
Hints in the History
  • Tenesmus often indicative of larger cancer
  • Constant anal pain or pain with defecation
    invasion of the anal sphincters or pelvic floor
  • Incontinence not a candidate for
    sphincter-sparing procedure

5
Tumor characteristics to assess on digital exam
  • Location
  • Morphology
  • Number of quadrants involved
  • Degree of fixation
  • Mobility
  • Extrarectal growths
  • Direct continuity
  • Separate

6
Pearls on Physical Exam
  • DRE
  • Fixation to anal sphincter
  • Relationship to anorectal ring
  • Fixation to rectal or pelvic wall
  • Rigid sigmoidoscopy
  • How much normal rectum lies distal to lower
    border of tumor

7
Clinical Staging System
Clinical Stage Mobility Path correlation (level of invasion)
CS1 Freely mobile Submucosa
CS2 Mobile with rectal wall Muscularis propria
CS3 Tethered mobility Perirectal fat
CS4 Fixed/tethered fixation Adjacent tissues
8
Treatment
  • Current management more varied and complex
  • Multimodality therapy
  • Refinements in surgical techniques

9
Factors determining treatment
  • Surgical anatomy
  • Depth of invasion
  • Lymph node status
  • Metastatic disease
  • Palliation should be the goal in patients for
    whom curative resection is not possible
  • If patient is reasonable operative risk,
    palliative resection may lead to better quality
    of life
  • Diversion can improve immediate status if primary
    is not resectable
  • Nonoperative therapy should be considered with
    significant metastatic disease

10
Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)
  • Precise sharp dissection and removal of the
    entire rectal mesentery, including that distal to
    the tumor, as an intact unit
  • Autonomic nerve preservation
  • Complete hemostasis
  • Avoidance of violation of the mesorectal envelope
  • Hypothesis that the field of rectal cancer spread
    is limited to this envelope and total removal
    encompasses virtually every tumor satellite

11
Surgical Therapy
  • Three major curative options
  • Local excision
  • Sphincter-saving abdominal surgery
  • APR
  • Each patient should be viewed individually and a
    plan devised based on their stage, gender, age,
    body habitus

12
APR
  • First described in 1908
  • Candidates are patients whose tumors have invaded
    the anal sphincters or are so close to the
    sphincter that a safe distal margin cannot be
    obtained
  • Poor continence may benefit from APR

13
LAR
  • Maintain continuity and preserve sphincter
    function
  • /- diverting loop ileostomy

14
Local Excision
  • PATIENT SELECTION REMAINS KEY!!
  • Take into account certain pathologic features
  • Depth of invasion
  • Lymphatic invasion
  • Histologic grade
  • Clear negative margins at the time of resection
  • Patients considered medically unfit for major
    resection may be good candidates for local exc

15
Local excision
  • Preserves anal sphincter anatomy and function
  • Small T1 and T2 lesions
  • T2 lesions probably should not have surgery alone
  • Preop or postop adjuvant chemoradiation is of
    benefit
  • Currently not recommended for T3 lesion

16
Local Excision
  • Properties of the tumor
  • lt4 cm in diameter
  • lt40 of bowel circumference
  • Within 10 cm of dentate line
  • Freely mobile on DRE
  • ERUS findings
  • T1 or T2
  • Negative nodes

17
Techniques
  • Transanal excision
  • 1-2 cm margin
  • Transcoccygeal excision (Kraske approach)
  • Middle or distal third of rectum, especially
    along posterior wall
  • Removes perirectal nodes
  • Transsphincteric excision
  • Increased risk of incontinence
  • TEM
  • Special resectoscope, better for more proximal
    lesions

18
Treatment recommendations after initial resection
T stage Low risk High risk
T1 No further treatment Adjuvant chemoradiation
T2 Adjuvant chemoradiation Radical resection
T3 Radical resection Radical resection
19
Stage I (T1N0, T2N0)
  • Distal T1
  • Local excision
  • Radical resection, often APR
  • Adjuvant therapy usually not recommended
  • Distal T2
  • Local excision with preop or postop adjuvant
    therapy
  • Radical resection without adjuvant therapy, often
    APR
  • Mid T1
  • TEM
  • Radical resection, usually LAR
  • Adjuvant therapy not recommended
  • Mid T2
  • TEM with pre or postop adjuvant therapy
  • Radical resection similar to T1
  • Adjuvant therapy not recommended for radical
    resection
  • Upper T1 and T2
  • LAR

20
Stage II (T3N0) and Stage III (TanyN)
  • Distal
  • Preop adjuvant therapy followed by radical
    resection
  • If preop imaging does not clearly define stage,
    resection can be done first, followed by postop
    adjuvant therapy
  • Mid
  • Same as distal except usually LAR can be
    performed
  • Upper
  • LAR, with either preop or postop adjuvant therapy

21
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com