Chapter 1 - Introduction - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Description:

... Forensic Science research and Training Center for research and development of new techniques/tools/methods Train lab ... Father of Criminal Investigation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:744
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: bac53
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 1 - Introduction


1
Chapter 1 - Introduction
  • Basics of Forensic Science

2
Definition and Scope
  • Forensic science is the application of science to
    law
  • Applies the knowledge and technology of science
    to the definition and enforcement of laws
  • Laws are continually being broadened and revised
    to address the alarming increase in crime rates

3
The Role of Science
  • Science cannot offer final and authoritative
    solutions to all problems
  • Social and psychological factors are always
    present
  • Science plays an important and unique role in the
    criminal justice system ability to supply
    accurate and objective information that reflects
    events that have occurred at a crime scene

4
Definition of Forensics Science
  • The application of science to the to the criminal
    and civil laws that are enforced by police
    agencies in a criminal justice system.

5
Diversity of Professions Involved
  • According to the American Academy of Forensic
    Science
  • Criminalistics (synonym for forensic science)
  • Engineering Science
  • General
  • Jurisprudence
  • Odontology
  • Pathology/Biology
  • Physical Anthropology
  • Psychiatry/Behavioral Science
  • Questioned Documents
  • Toxicology

6
Additions to the list of 10
  • Fingerprint examination
  • Firearm and tool mark examination
  • Technology analysis
  • Computers
  • Digital data analysis
  • Photography

7
History and Development
  • Individuals who developed the principles and
    techniques needed to identify or compare physical
    evidence
  • Those who recognized the need to merge these
    principles into a coherent discipline that could
    be practically applied to a criminal justice
    system

8
Early Developments
  • One of the earliest records
  • 3rd century China manuscript Yi Yu Ji
  • Case solved where a woman was suspected of
    murdering her husband
  • Evidence showed that he was murdered and she
    admitted her guilt
  • Chinese were also the first to recognize the
    potential of fingerprints for identification
    purposes
  • Often the exception rather than the rule for
    criminal investigations

9
Early Developments (continued)
  • Limited knowledge of anatomy and pathology
  • Hampered the development of Forensic Science
    until late 17th and early 18th centuries
  • First recorded notes about fingerprint
    characteristics
  • 1686, Marcello Malpighi
  • Did not acknowledge the value of fingerprints as
    a method of ID

10
Initial Scientific Advances
  • 1798 A Treatise on Forensic medicine and Public
    Health
  • François-Emanuel Fodéré
  • Breakthroughs in chemistry also helped
  • 1775 Carl Wilhelm Scheele devised first
    successful test for detecting arsenic in dead
    bodies

11
Initial Advances (continued)
  • 1814 Mathieu Orfila
  • Father of forensic toxicology
  • Published the first scientific treatise (study)
    on the detection of poisons and their effects on
    animals
  • Mid-1800s
  • Advance of several scientific disciplines which
    advanced the field of forensics
  • 1828 William Nichol polarizing microscope
  • 1839 Henri-Louis Bayard microscopic detection
    of sperm
  • 1839 toxicological evidence first used at a
    trial
  • 1853 microcrystalline test for hemoglobin
  • 1863 first presumptive test for blood
  • 1850s and 1860s use of photography in forensics

12
Late 19th-Century Progress
  • Beginning to apply knowledge from all scientific
    disciplines to the study of crime
  • Anthropology/Morphology (structures of living
    organisms) applied to the first system of
    personal identification
  • 1879 Alphonse Bertillon
  • Named anthropometry systematic procedure for
    using a series of body measurements as a means of
    distinguishing one person from another (later
    replaced by fingerprinting)
  • Father of Criminal Investigation

13
More on the 19th century
  • Bertillons anthropometry later replaced by
    fingerprinting
  • Thomas Taylor (American) said that fingerprints
    could be used for ID
  • Supported by Scottish physician Henry Faulds
  • 1892 Francis Henry Gaulton undertook the first
    definitive study of fingerprints and developed a
    method for classifying them

14
Sherlock Holmes
  • Not a real person
  • Legendary but fictional detective in stories by
    Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
  • Had a considerable influence on popularizing
    crime-detection methods
  • Applied newly developing principles of serology
    (blood/body fluids), fingerprinting, firearms ID
    and document analysis in his stories
  • Doyles A Study in Scarlet is a classic example
    (see excerpt)

15
20th Century Breakthroughs
  • 1901 Karl Landsteiner
  • Discovered ABO blood types
  • 1910 Albert S. Osborne
  • Wrote the first significant text on Questioned
    Documents (document examination)
  • 1915 Dr. Leon Lattes
  • Developed a simple procedure for identifying the
    blood group from a dried blood stain
  • Immediately applied to criminal investigations
  • Acceptance of documents as scientific evidence by
    the courts
  • 1923 Calvin Godddard
  • Used comparison microscope to refine techniques
    of firearms examination

16
Edmond Locard
  • French
  • Formal education in both medicine and law
  • Started the first police lab in 1910
  • Founder and director of the Institute of
    Criminalistics _at_ the University of Lyons (France)
  • Leading international center for study and
    research in forensic science
  • Strongly believed every criminal can be connected
    to a crime by dust particles carried from the
    crime scene
  • Locards successes helped start police labs in
    Vienna, Berlin, Sweden, Finland and Holland

17
Locards Exchange Principle
  • When two objects (or people) come in contact with
    each other, a cross-transfer of materials occurs

18
Modern Scientific Advances
  • Mid-20th century
  • Revolution in computer technology
  • Dramatically impacted the field of forensics
  • Wide array of sophisticated techniques for
    analyzing evidence available
  • Chromatography
  • Spectrophotometry (measuring the
    absorption/reflection of light by materials)
  • Electrophoresis

19
DNA
  • Most significant modern advance
  • DNA typing and profiling
  • 1984 Sir Alec Jeffries developed the first DNA
    profiling test
  • 1986 DNA profiling used to solve the Pitchfork
    murders of two young English girls (Colin
    Pitchfork)
  • Precise ID of a suspect can be determined

20
Computer Databases
  • Fingerprints
  • Bullets and shell casings
  • DNA
  • Significantly reduced the time it takes to
    analyze evidence and increase accuracy of the
    results

21
Key Points
  • Forensic science is the application of science to
    criminal and civil laws that are enforced by
    police agencies in a criminal justice system
  • The first system of criminal ID was called
    anthropometry. It distinguished one individual
    from another based on a series of body
    measurements
  • Forensic science owes its origins to individuals
    such as Bertillon, Gaulton, Lattes, Goddard,
    Osborne and Locard, who developed the techniques
    needed to identify or compare physical evidence.
  • Locards Exchange Principle states that when two
    objects come in contact with each other, a
    cross-transfer of materials occurs that can
    connect a criminal suspect to his/her victim.

22
Crime Laboratories - History
  • 1923 Los Angeles Police Dept. crime lab is the
    oldest
  • Established by August Vollmer
  • 1948 School of Criminology formed at UC-Berkley
  • 1932 FBI established under President Herbert
    Hoover
  • Offered forensic services to all law enforcement
    agencies in the USA
  • 1981 Forensic Science research and Training
    Center for research and development of new
    techniques/tools/methods
  • Train lab personnel in the latest techniques
  • Most labs are run locally or at the state level

23
Organization of a Crime Lab
  • Characterized by rapid growth
  • Lack of national/regional planning/coordination
  • Levels federal, state, county, municipal
  • Size and diversity makes it impossible to adopt a
    single model of operation
  • Most function as part of the local police
    department, prosecutor, district attorney or
    medical examiner (coroner)

24
Growth
  • Several reasons explain the rapid growth of crime
    labs in the past 40 years
  • Supreme Court decisions requiring scientific,
    objective treatment of evidence
  • Constitutional rights of suspects (Miranda
    Rights)
  • Changing judicial requirements due to the
    staggering increase in crime rates in the USA,
    especially drug-related crime
  • DNA technology/profiling needs more qualified
    personnel to analyze the evidence
  • Drug cases still outnumber DNA cases

25
Crime Labs in the USA
  • Desire to retain local control
  • Produced a variety of independent labs
  • Government has no single law enforcement agency
    with unlimited jurisdiction

26
Crime Labs in the USA (continued)
  • FBI (Department of Justice)
  • Maintains the largest crime lab in the world
  • Ultramodern facility located in Quantico, VA
  • DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration -
    (Department of Justice)
  • Analyzes drugs seized in violation of federal
    laws regulating production, sale and transport
  • ATF (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms)
  • Analyzes alcoholic beverages
  • Examines documents related to alcohol and firearm
    excise tax law enforcement
  • Examines weapons, explosive devices and related
    evidence
  • Gun control Act of 1968
  • Organized crime Control Act of 1970
  • U.S. Postal Service
  • Criminal investigations related to the postal
    service

27
Local and International Crime Labs
  • Most state governments maintain a crime lab some
    wit regional or satellite offices (larger states)
  • Try to be cost-effective by not duplicating
    services
  • Most countries have created and maintain
    facilities
  • Organization can vary from country to country
  • Often operate on a fee-for-service basis (some
    can be private companies)

28
Services of the Crime Lab
  • Wide variation in total services offered
  • There are many reasons for this
  • Variations in local laws
  • Different capabilities/functions of the
    organization to which the lab is attached
  • Budgetary and staffing limitations (often very
    limited)
  • Some labs have strict functions like processing
    drug specimens only

29
Basic Services
  • Physical Science Unit
  • Principles of chemistry, physics and geology
  • ID/comparison of crime-scene evidence
  • Biology Unit
  • Biologists/biochemists
  • DNA profiling, ID/comparison of biological
    evidence including botanical materials
  • Firearms Unit
  • Examines firearms, discharged bullets, cartridge
    cases, shotgun shells, ammunition, residues, tool
    marks
  • Determine composition, distance, angles
  • Document Examination Unit
  • Handwriting/typewriting on questioned documents
  • Ascertain authenticity/source
  • Photography Unit
  • Examines/records photographic evidence
  • Uses highly specialized techniques such as
    digital imaging, IR, UV, X-ray to make invisible
    images/information visible

30
Optional Services Provided by a Full-service
Crime Lab
  • Toxicology Unit
  • Examines body fluids/organs to determine the
    presence/absence of drugs
  • Latent Fingerprint Unit
  • Processes and examines fingerprint evidence
  • Polygraph Unit
  • Lie detecting
  • Voiceprint Analysis Unit
  • Involves cases of telephone threats or recorded
    messages
  • Trained analysts tie the voice to a suspect
  • Sound spectrograph creates a voiceprint
  • Sound patterns produced in speech are unique

31
Optional Services (continued)
  • Crime-Scene Investigation Unit
  • Dispatched specially trained personnel to a crime
    scene to collect/preserve evidence to be analyzed
    later in the lab
  • Includes forensic pathology, entomology and
    anthropology
  • Forensic Psychiatry
  • Examines the relationship between human behavior
    and legal proceedings
  • Behavior patterns of criminals/behavior profile
  • Forensic Odontology
  • ID victims based on dental evidence
  • Bite mark analysis linked to tooth structure on a
    suspect
  • Forensic Engineering
  • Failure analysis, accident reconstruction,
    causes/origins of fires/explosions
  • Forensic Computer/Digital Analysis
  • Identifying, collecting, preserving and examining
    information derived from computers/digital devices

32
Key Points
  • The development of crime labs in the USA has been
    characterized by rapid growth accompanied by a
    lack of national and regional planning and
    coordination
  • Four major reasons for the increase in the number
    of crime labs in the USA since the 1960s are as
    follows
  • The fact that the requirement to advise criminal
    suspects of their constitutional rights, right to
    immediate access to counsel has all but
    eliminated confessions as a routine investigative
    tool
  • The staggering increase in crime rates in the USA
  • The fact that all illicit drug seizures must be
    sent to a lab for confirmatory chemical analysis
    before a case can go to court
  • The advent of DNA profiling
  • The technical support provided by crime labs can
    be assigned to 5 basic services
  • Some crime labs offer optional services such as
    toxicology, fingerprint analysis, polygraph
    administration, voiceprint analysis, and
    crime-scene investigation.
  • Special forensic services available to the law
    enforcement community include forensic pathology,
    entomology, psychiatry, odontology, engineering,
    computer/digital analysis.

33
Functions of the Forensic Scientist
  • Analyzing Physical Evidence
  • Apply principles of physical/natural sciences in
    analyzing evidence
  • Only physical evidence is free of error/bias
  • Must undergo scientific inquiry the integrity
    of evidence comes from applying the scientific
    method
  • Not tainted by human error/distortion of facts

34
Functions of the Forensic Scientist (continued)
  • Determining the admissibility of evidence
  • Frye vs. The United States
  • Procedures/techniques/principles are generally
    accepted by the scientific community
  • Federal Rules of Evidence
  • Governs admissibility of evidence including
    expert testimony on a scientific/technical matter
    if
  • Testimony is based on sufficient facts/data
  • Testimony is the product of reliable
    principles/methods
  • Witness has applied the principles/methods
    reliably to the facts of the case
  • (also used in state courts)

35
Functions of the Forensic Scientist (continued)
  • Judging Scientific Evidence
  • Judge assumes ultimate responsibility for
    admissibility/reliability of evidence
  • The Court offers some guidelines
  • Whether the scientific technique/theory can be
    tested
  • Whether the scientific technique/theory has been
    subject of peer review/publication
  • Techniques potential rate of error
  • Existence/maintenance of standards controlling
    the techniques operation
  • Whether the scientific technique/method has
    attracted widespread acceptance within the
    relevant scientific community
  • Providing Expert Testimony
  • Performing the analysis of evidence
  • May be required to testify in court about their
    methods, etc.
  • Education/training is very important

36
Key Points
  • A forensic scientist must be skilled in applying
    the principles and techniques of the
    physical/natural sciences to analyzing evidence
    that may be recovered during a criminal
    investigation.
  • The cases Frye vs. the United States and Daubert
    vs. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. set
    guidelines for determining the admissibility of
    scientific evidence into the courtroom.
  • An expert witness evaluates evidence based on
    specialized training/experience.
  • Forensic scientists participate in training law
    enforcement personnel in the proper recognition,
    collection and preservation of physical evidence.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com