Title: Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review
1Solar Energy Technologies Program Peer Review
- Improved Fullerenes for OPV
- TDA Research
- 303 940 2314
- May 26, 2010
2Overview
Timeline
Barriers
- Project start date 8/8/2007
- Project end date 8/7/2009
- Percent complete 100
- OPV are not sufficiently efficient this project
will increase the efficiency of organic
photovoltaics.
Budget
Partners
- Total project funding
- DOE share 850,000
- Contractor share 185,227
- DOE Funding received in FY09 379,490
- DOE Funding for FY10 0
- TDA Research, lead
- NREL, sub
2
3Challenges, Barriers or Problems
OPV Champion Device Efficiency by Year
- Though rapidly improving, the efficiency of
organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells remains low - Due to their extremely versatile and low-cost
fabrication, a few percent additional increase in
OPV efficiency will lead to their wide-spread
adoption in a tremendous variety of
power-generation applications.
4Relevance
- Objective To increase the efficiency of OPV by
increasing the open circuit voltage (Voc) through
the synthesis of new electron-rich fullerenes,
used as acceptors in a variety of OPV
architectures - Voc in OPV ? (ionization potential of the
polymer) (electron affinity of the fullerene).
Reduce the fullerenes electron affinity,
increase Voc. - Current Voc is 0.5 V
- 2020 target efficiency is 12 (2008-2012 MYPP)
- 2010 champion device efficiency is 7.4
- Need new materials that maintain low-cost
manufacturing - 2009 objectives were the de novo synthesis and
characterization of electron-rich fullerene
derivatives, followed by testing of the new
fullerenes in OPV devices - New materials for OPV are created by synthetic
organic chemistry. - Good incredibly large choice of materials fine
tailoring of properties - Bad de novo synthesis can be slow costly
4
5Approach
- Summarized Project Tasks
- Optimize OPV performance from the materials
developed in Phase I - Perform quantum chemical modeling of new
synthetic targets - Synthesize the new electron-rich fullerene
derivatives using the methodology developed in
Phase I - Characterize the new fullerenes
- Electrochemistry
- UV-vis absorbance
- Solubility
- Stability
- Test their performance in OPV
- Inverted bulk heterojunction (BHJ) cells with
poly(3-hexylthiophene (P3HT) - ITO/MgxZn1-xO/P3HTfullerene/(PEDOTPSS or
oxide/)Ag device geometry
Iterate
5
6Approach
- Electron-rich elements tend to react directly
with electron-poor fullerenes, without altering
the electron affinity from that of PCBM - Must ensure that the extra electron density is
present in the lowest unoccupied molecular
orbital (LUMO) of the resulting derivative - Quantum chemistry calculations allow for
downselection of targets - Example C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2
- Electron Affinity 2.399 eV (vs. PCBM 2.522
eV) MO52X/6-311G(d,p) calculation - The LUMO is on the fullerene
6
7Collaborations
- NREL
- 100,000 subcontract using a CRADA
- Preparation and testing of the promising new
fullerene derivatives in BJ OPV using their
state-of-the-art facilities
7
8Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Initial Synthetic Strategy
Three step synthesis of PCPZEA. The resulting
isomer mixture is converted to pure (6,6)PCPZEA
by stirring the purified isomer mixture under a
sodium lamp for four hours. 1 NEt3, CH2Cl2, 0?
C, 1h H2O, MgSO4, LC (silica) 32 yield. 2
CH3OH, 6h reflux -CH3OH, CH2Cl2 H2O, MgSO4, LC
(silica) 20 yield. 3 NaOCH3, pyridine, oDCB,
70? C, 16h, dark -pyridine, -oDCB, LC (silica)
2x 50 yield (consumed C60 basis).
New products compared to PCBM similar
solubility, similar morphology expected
9Accomplishments / Progress / Results
The new fullerenes do not work in normal devices
with low work function metals
ITO/PEDOTPSS/(fullerene)P3HT/Ba/Al
ITO/PEDOTPSS/PCPZEAP3HT/LiF/Al
10Accomplishments / Progress / Results
PCPZEA does work in inverted devices Tuning the
work function of the TCO electrode greatly
enhances efficiency
ITO/Zn1-xMgxO/P3HTPCPZEA/Ag devices cast from
ODCB
11Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Synthesis of PCSME
Thermally unstable
12Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Quantum Chemical Calculations for PCSME
Structure Determination
- Molecular mechanics conformational analysis
- vary the dihedral angles, minimize the energy
- 10,000 optimizations
- each of the 200 lowest energy structures was
found about 50 times - The six lowest energy conformers (of 200) all
had the N pointing away from C60
N in blue, O in red
13Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Quantum Chemical Calculations Electron Affinity
- Four lowest energy conformers 7 (amine down)
geometry optimized - with M052X/6-31G
- 7 is 5 kcal/mol higher in energy than 1
- Thermal energy at ambient temperature 0.59
kcal/mol - Not much 7 likely to be present
- Unless the crystal lattice energy imposes a
higher energy conformation - Single point energy calculated at
M052X/6-311G(d,p) - Rather little difference in electron affinity
between - PCBM and PCSME (either conformer) or TCSMe
- C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2 still looks good
14Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Where Are the Electrons Going?
- Idea 1 The ester is stealing them
- Replace the ester with an alkyl chain
- Conformational analysis structure optimization
- Electron Affinity is now 2.521 eV
- Same as PCBM
- Not the ester
- Idea 2 The phenyl ring is stealing them
- Replace the phenyl ring with a t-butyl group
- Conformational analysis structure optimization
- Electron affinity is now 2.459 eV
- Halfway between PCBM and C60C(CH2N(CH2)2)2
- Yes, its the phenyl ring, combined with having
an - amine on both sides of the vertex carbon
15Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Other Synthetic Targets with Amines
3,6-diamine substituted cyclohexyl (A Diels-Alder
adduct?) Electron Affinity 2.354 eV
Imidazoline Adduct Electron Affinity 2.436 eV
16Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Silyl Adducts
C60C(CH3)2 Electron Affinity 2.497
(CH3)2SiC60 Electron Affinity 2.393 eV
((CH3)2Si)2CC60 Electron Affinity 2.501 eV (Not
useful)
Recent work from Japan shows SIMEF has 0.1 eV
lower electron affinity than PCBM (JACS 131,
16048), and OPV with phthalocyanine has PCE 5.2
17Accomplishments / Progress / Results
Other syntheses, other calculations, other
devices not yet IP-protected Stability of
electron-rich fullerene derivatives is clearly an
issue rearrangements and oxidations are
frequent (and frustrating)
18Budget Status and Potential for Expansion
- DOE 750,000 Phase II 100,000 Phase I
- TDA 185,227 Equipment 60,283 Labor
- Project and budget are complete
- Additional funding would allow us to pursue new
derivatives - Enhance the stability of the new derivatives
through the introduction of bulky substituents
and/or other chemical motifs - Increased purity of the new derivatives
- Only 98 achieved routinely, impairing
performance - Commercial electronic grade PCBM is 99.5
19Future Plans (FY 2011 and beyond)
- Pursue patent protection on the composition of
matter of the new fullerenes, as well as the
synthetic methodology - Market the materials to OPV manufacturers
- Attempt to further enhance purity of the stable
new fullerene derivatives
20Summary
- OPV is swiftly advancing efficiency has doubled
in 6 years and there is no sign of advancements
slowing down - Expect to meet the 12 goal by 2015 at this
pace, ahead of the MYPP target of 2020 - While cell construction can enhance efficiency,
the big steps are taken with new materials - Excellent progress has been made with low bandgap
polymers to enhance currents, but little
published work has appeared with new fullerenes
to enhance Voc - QC calculations prove that significant
enhancements in performance are possible, but new
derivatives must also have proper solubility and
stability
20