Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance Science Inc., Robert Patrick Rutgers University 30th USAEE/IAEE North American - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance Science Inc., Robert Patrick Rutgers University 30th USAEE/IAEE North American

Description:

Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance Science Inc., – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:232
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: JanieC4
Learn more at: https://www.usaee.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Option Values of Alternative Completion and Production Strategies in Shale Gas Plays Janie M Chermak, University of New Mexico James Crafton, Performance Science Inc., Robert Patrick Rutgers University 30th USAEE/IAEE North American


1
Option Values of Alternative Completion and
ProductionStrategies in Shale Gas PlaysJanie
M Chermak, University of New MexicoJames
Crafton, Performance Science Inc.,Robert Patrick
Rutgers University30th USAEE/IAEE North
American ConferenceWashington, DCOctober 12,
2011
2
Shale Gas Plays
3
These wells are depleting so quickly thatthe
operators are in an expensive gameof catch-up
Deborah Rogers, 11/2009
4
Shale Gas Plays
  • PRODUCTION
  • - 2008 2.02 trillion cubic feet (Tcf)
  • - 2009 3.11 Tcf
  • RESERVES
  • - 860 Tcf, with 410 Tcf from Marcellus
  • (EIA AEO 2011)
  • - 84 Tcf from Marcellus
  • (USGS Aug 2011)

5
Shale Gas Plays
Impact of shale gas on the natural gas industry
depends on - actual production meeting
forecasts - ultimate recovery
6
Research
  • Actual production
  • - reservoir characteristics
  • - well characteristics
  • - capital choices (completion and re-completion)
  • - production choices
  • Ultimate recovery may depend on
  • - all of the above and
  • - early management production decisions

7
Model
  • Develop a theoretical dynamic optimization
    model
  • that allows for periodic capital investment over
  • the life of the well.
  • Based on the necessary conditions we develop
  • an econometrically estimable cumulative
  • production function

X is a vector or reservoir characteristics and Z
is a vector of completion and production
choices. Included in Z are characteristics of
the completion job, including the fracture
half-length, Fi.
8
Model
The fracture sub-production function is also a
function of reservoir characteristics and
completion choices
9
Model
We estimate this simultaneous system of equations
using 3SLS and a log-log specification.
10
Data
  • 120 shale gas wells located in the US
  • - 39 horizontal wells
  • - 81 vertical wells
  • all wells began production since 2007
  • have between 30 and 720 days of production data
  • production data
  • reservoir characteristics
  • completion and production choices

11
  • Well Characteristics
  • - permeability thickness
  • - Initial Reservoir Pressure
  • - Perforated Interval
  • Completion Choices
  • - Gallons of fracture fluid
  • - Pound of proppant
  • - Barrels per minute
  • - PSIG
  • - Stages
  • - Micro-emulsion concentration
  • - 100 Mesh
  • - 2040 Equivalent Mesh
  • - Winter Fracture
  • - Time between completion start and first
    production
  • Completion Outcome
  • - Fracture Half-length final and early
  • - Fracture Conductivity
  • Cumulative Production

12
(No Transcript)
13
Results
  • The fracture resulting from the completion job
    is
  • significant and positive for early period
    production
  • Fracture conductivity significant and positive
  • for vertical wells
  • Micro-emulsion concentration has a positive
  • and significant impact
  • The completion job is significant. For
    horizontal
  • wells it is how the job is performed
  • (rate and pressure) for vertical wells it is
    the
  • volumes and how the job is performed.

14
Results
  • Stages are significant and positive for
    horizontal wells,
  • but not for vertical wells
  • Delay between beginning completion and
  • production significant and negative
  • Ratio is significant and negative
  • Winter completion job negatively impacts
    vertical
  • well production
  • Decline (all else equal) different. Early
    period
  • decline 7 larger for horizontal wells

15
Conclusions
  • Shale Gas Plays impacting the US natural gas
    industry
  • May not be as well understood as we first
    believed
  • Initial choices may impact well potential
  • Initial choices may impact ultimate recoverable
    gas
  • Preliminary results suggest vertical and
    horizontal well
  • productivity are impacted by reservoir
    characteristics,
  • completion and production choices, but not
    necessarily
  • in the same manner.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com