Teaming and Difficult Conversations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Teaming and Difficult Conversations

Description:

Commitment Has your team identified its purpose? Does the team represent stakeholders in the school? Is there commitment to: The team itself? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:505
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: PetreaHag9
Learn more at: http://www.oregonrti.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teaming and Difficult Conversations


1
Teaming and Difficult Conversations
  • OrRTI Sustaining Training
  • June 1st, 2007

2
Five Characteristics
Results
Accountable
Commitment
Conflict Capable
Trust
3
Trust
  • What are issues that your team might encounter
    that are based on trust.

4
Conflict Capable
  • What experiences has your team had that have
    tested your conflict capability?
  • What skills did someone use to address the
    conflict?

5
Commitment
  • Has your team identified its purpose?
  • Does the team represent stakeholders in the
    school?
  • Is there commitment to
  • The team itself?
  • To the teams purpose (children)?

6
Accountable
  • Is there a clear agenda and purpose for each
    meeting?
  • Is the role of each person defined?
  • When preparation is required, is it complete for
    the meeting?
  • Is there a mechanism for fixing accountability
    problems?
  • Does the team take responsibility for maintaining
    itself?

7
Results
  • Does the team get to the core of its purpose and
    evaluate outcomes?
  • Does the team encourage, plan, and celebrate
    together?

8
How Teams Go South
  • Meetings
  • Communication
  • Teamwork
  • Decision-making
  • Handling conflict

9
Critical Elements for Meetings
  • Purpose
  • Attention to structure
  • Agenda
  • Topic outcomes
  • Content vs. process
  • Clarity about meeting roles
  • Meeting closure

10
Decision Making
  • Know your desired outcomes
  • Stakeholder buy-in, time frames
  • Level of decision-making needed to reach desired
    outcome
  • Frame problems broadly
  • Set criteria for evaluating options
  • Separate generating options from judging options
  • Have back-up strategies if agreement is elusive
    (for consensus decisions)

11
A communication strategy
  • DARE
  • Data (I notice. . .)
  • Assumptions (I think it must be that. . .)
  • Reaction (I feel. . .)
  • Expectations (I bring this up so that. . .)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com