To Fluoridate or NOT?

1
To Fluoridate or NOT?

• Is this a question of who is the cleverest
  therefore who wins the debate
• the PROs or the CONs?
• OR
• Is it Too Late/Coup de Grâce/Fête Accompli
  (If you think so you
  shouldnt be here. Remember the smallest flame at
  night)
• OR
• Is this a more vital issue concerning
• OUR RIGHTS?

2
Freedom- Do we Have Rights Freedom a Choice?

• What is Freedom A state of liberty where an
  individual or group does not have
  unreasonable external
  restraints or persuasions applied to them
  by another individual or group
  Churchill The Freedom Fighter
• Have our rights our freedom been invaded? YES!
  Do we Consent? NO !
  The decision to
  Fluoridate our water supply is totally
  dictatorial and I for one would not hesitate to
  sue the Queensland Government if I was one of the
  unfortunate people to suffer a serious side
  effect as a consequence of fluoridation.
  Dr. Michael Tait

3

Can we learn from History?
The desire to Control Absolute
Power is absolute Control which is absolutely
CORRUPT

• 1877 Nathan Rothschild
  I care not what power controls the
  (The founder of the IMF)
  people, for if I control their money
  (130 years ago!)
  supply, then I control their Empire
• Monsanto If I control your food supply
  then I (GM foods founders)
  control your Nations
• 2008 Qld Gov I dont care what you
  say, because we are
  doing it This is effectively saying
  I care not what you say. If I
  control your water supply then I
  control you

4
Should We Conform What does To Conform
Mean?

• STARTLING RESEARCH To conform to a dictator
  because you have been at school together or
  belong to the same club or to the same social
  class sounds ridiculous is extremely dangerous.
  Yet more freedom has been lost during this
  century through this reason for conforming, than
  through the actions of the dictators themselves!!
• Immediately after World War 11 a Court was
  assembled in Nuremburg for charging top ranking
  German military officers scientists. The charge
  was medical experimentation on people against
  their wish. All were found guilty some were
  executed.

5
So is Forcing Fluoride on us Against our Will
Any Different?

• Dr. Moolenburgh in the Netherlands stated that
  fluoridation is not acceptable in many European
  countries which had been occupied by the Nazis.
  Why? Because the people were quick to see the
  true nature of a totalitarian program they
  formed "resistance" groups against fluoridation
  like the "resistance" to the Nazis in the
  1940s. 
• I also ask What next after Fluoride?
  ?Microchips
• Our Rights - If Fluoridation is introduced it
  totally disregards the Nuremberg Code of Medical
  Practice and the perpetrators should be reported
  and charged at the International Court of Justice
  in The Hague.

6
The Nuremberg Code (1947)

• We must be convinced by the evidence before us
  that medical experiments conducted on human
  beings, are kept within well-defined bounds
  must conform to the ethics of the medical
  profession generally. The protagonists of the
  practice of human experimentation justify their
  views on the basis that such experiments yield
  results for the good of society they can not be
  procured by any other methods. Everyone agrees
  however that the basic principles of
  experimentation must satisfy the following moral,
  ethical and legal concepts
• The voluntary consent of the human subject is
  absolutely essential. This means that the person
  involved should have legal capacity to give
  consent should be so situated as to be able to
  exercise free power of choice, without the
  intervention of any element of force, fraud,
  deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior
  form of constraint or coercion and should have
  sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the
  elements of the subject matter involved as to
  enable him to make an understanding and
  enlightened decision

7
What ARE our RIGHTS?

• It is obvious that our rights are being
  threatened by the dictatorial attitude of the
  government on the fluoridation issue without
  our consultation or after poor consultation.
• Some of the fundamental questions about the
  fluoridation of public water supplies are ethical
  in nature
• 1. Is medication with an uncontrolled dose
  wrong?
• 2. Is compulsory mass medication wrong?
• 3. Is fluoridation right if its risks are less
  than its benefits?
• 4. Is this medication or experimentation?

8
Facts Existing Global Experience

• Germany "Generally, in Germany fluoridation of
  drinking water is forbidden. The relevant German
  law allows some exceptions only on application.
  The argument of the Federal Ministry of Health
  against a general permission of fluoridation of
  drinking water is the problematic ethics of
  compulsory medication."
•  
• France "Fluoride chemicals are not included in
  the list of 'chemicals for drinking water
  treatment'. This is due to ethical as well as
  medical considerations."
•  
• Belgium "The addition of Fluoride to water
  treatment has never been used and will never be
  used in the future. The main reason for this is
  that it is not the Governments task to deliver
  medicinal treatment to people. This is the sole
  responsibility of Health Services."
•  
• Denmark According to the Danish Ministry of
  Environment and Energy, toxic fluorides have
  never been added to the public water supplies.
  Consequently, no Danish city has ever been
  fluoridated.
•  

9
Global Experience 2

• Sweden Drinking water fluoridation is not
  allowed in Sweden... No new scientific
  documentation or changes that could alter the
  conclusions of the Commission have been
  demonstrated
• Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal,
  Douglas Carnall, stated Professionals who
  propose compulsory preventive measures for a
  whole population have a different weight of
  responsibility on their shoulders, than those who
  respond to the requests of individuals for help.
  Previously neutral on the issue, I am now
  persuaded by the arguments that those who wish to
  take fluoride (like me) had better get it from
  toothpaste rather than the water supply

10
Global Experience 3

• Czech Republic"Since 1993, drinking water has
  not been treated with fluoride throughout the
  Czech Republic for the following reasons
  
  (a) UNECONOMICAL -only 0.54 of
  the water treated is used for drinking, the
  remainder is employed for hygiene etc.
  Furthermore, an increasing amount of consumers
  (particularly children) are using bottled water
  for drinking (underground water which usually
  contains fluorine)
• (b) UNECOLOGICAL It is an environmental load by a
  foreign
• substance.
• (c) UNETHICAL because it is "forced medication
• (d) TOXILOGICALLY physiologically debatable.
  Fluoridation represents an untargeted form of
  supplementation which disregards actual
  individual intake and requirements and may lead
  to excessive health-threatening intake in certain
  population groups.

11
Side Effects
The 3 Stages of Fluorosis

• Phase 1 sporadic pain stiffness of joints
  osteosclerosis of pelvis and vertebral column
• Phase 2 chronic joint pain arthritic symptoms
  slight calcification of ligaments increased
  osteosclerosis/cancellous bones with/without
  osteoporosis of long bones.
• Phase 3 Crippling Skeletal Fluorosis limitation
  of joint movement calcification of
  ligaments/neck and vertebral column crippling
  deformities of spine and major joints muscle
  wasting neurological defects/ compression of
  spinal cord

12
Some Examples of Fluorosis
hyperostosis, osteopetrosis
13
50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoride

• No disease has ever been linked to fluoride
  deficiency
• Fluoridation is not necessary
• A trial of 39,000 children showed no decay
  difference
• Stopping the use of Fluoride did not result in gt
  decay
• Family income is a gt important factor than
  Fluoride
• Decay incidence was decreasing before Fluoride
  use!
• Effects are Topical not Systemic so why swallow
  it? Toothpaste
• FDA has never approved Fluoride for systemic use
• 48 of children using Fluoride suffer from
  Fluorosis

14

• Fluorosis means overdosing with Fluoride
• No benefits only risks for infants ingesting
  Fluoride
• Fluoride accumulates 50 is retained by bones
• It inhibits a number of enzyme actions
• Aluminum-fluoride combination interferes with
  many hormonal and some neurochemical signals
• It is mutagenic can interfere with DNA repair
• Combines with Mg Calcium leading to depletion
• Research revealed kidney brain damage (mice)
• The Environmental Protection Agency warned about
  the high potential neurotoxicity effects

15

• Many reports confirm Brain Damage from Fluoride!
• Five China studies showed IQ lowering in children
  
• Jennifer Luke Ph.D Confirmed accumulation effects
• USA studies confirm decrease in Thyroid function
• Skeletal fluorosis mimics arthritis can be
  missed
• High doses resulted in an gt in bone fractures
• 11/19 studies showed gtin hip fractures in the
  elderly
• There may be gt tendency to bone liver oral
  cancer
• New Jersey study ? 6X risk bone cancer gt young
  men

16

• Fluoridation programs are very poorly monitored
• Research reveals sperm fertility damage. I urge
  you to do a search for The disappearing Male
• It is not possible to monitor an individuals
  intake once Fluoride is in the water supply
• Its unethical were not asked for informed
  consent
• Individual rights (v) majority rule means a
  referendum is unnecessary.
• 1 of individuals are highly sensitive to
  Fluoride
• The elderly, diabetics kidney disease patients
  are vulnerable to toxic effects
• The poor or malnourished are also very vulnerable
• The real oral health CRISIS is poverty NOT
  Fluoride

17

1. In 2000 a British Government Review could give no
   fluoridation trial a grade A classification. NONE
2. USA introduced Fluoridation in 1950 with no
   trials!
3. Fluoride does not reduce pit fissure decay.
4. 85 of teeth with pits fissures dental
   decay!
5. Fluoride in USA comes from hazardous wastes
6. These wastes have NOT been tested only
   pharmaceutical grades have been tested
7. There is an gt uptake of lead in children on
   Fluoride
8. 1 teaspoon of Sodium Fluoride will kill an adult

18

• 46 14 Nobel Laureates wont endorse
  Fluoridation
• Nobel Laureate in Medicine 2000 I am quite
  convinced that water fluoridation, in a
  not-too-distant future, will be consigned to
  medical history
• American College of Toxicology. No credible
  people support the fluorophobics' view.
• Many scientists, doctors and dentists who have
  spoken out publicly on this issue have been
  subjected to censorship and intimidation.
• The Union representing the scientists at US EPA
  headquarters The requirement for every man,
  woman and child in America to ingest Fluoride
  borders on criminal behaviour on the part of the
  government.

19
Is This Enough to say NO FLUORIDE?

• NO! HERES MORE.
• Question -What is the source of the Fluoride
• Answer Japan European Countries
• Question Why do they pay us to take their
  Fluoride
• Answer Because we are a dumping ground for
  waste!
• Question Is this a Meaningful Health Issue
• Answer Most definitely NOT. It is an
  unfortunate truth that most major international
  issues wars, finance (IMF Federal Reserve) and
  Health (FDA Big Pharma etc) are concerns of greed
  and power.

20
Life is Always a Matter of Choices

• What do YOU want to do?
• FIGHT IT
• Approach/Fight the Government
• Check your Constitutional Rights
• Take it The Hague
  AVOID IT
• Dont drink the Water Use Tanks
• Investigate an efficient filter system
• http//www.pwgazette.com/problemfluoride.htm
• (distillation, reverse osmosis, filtration
  through a special fluoride/arsenic reduction
  medium called activated alumina)

21
SO Remember A Massive Fire
Can Begin with the Smallest Ember.
That Ember is YOU
22
Campylobacter Can Kill