Comparative Criminal Justice Systems - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems

Description:

Comparative Criminal Justice Systems The Sentencing Process: From Fines to the Death Penalty Reichel / Albanese Questions: What does society hope to gain from ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:718
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: KeithW57
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparative Criminal Justice Systems


1
Comparative Criminal Justice Systems
  • The Sentencing Process
  • From Fines to the Death Penalty
  • Reichel / Albanese

2
Questions
  • What does society hope to gain
  • from punishing wrongdoers?
  • Explain the difference between
  • a sanction with a humanitarian motive and
  • a sanction with a utilitarian motive.
  • What would be advantages or disadvantages of
    both?
  • Do sanctions serve an economic function?
  • If so, should they?

3
The Sentencing Process
  • Philosophies of
  • Punishment
  • Retribution
  • Rehabilitation
  • Deterrence
  • Incapacitation
  • Restoration
  • Sentencing Practices
  • Noncustodial sanctions
  • Corporal punishment
  • Imprisonment
  • Death penalty

4
Question
  • Consider the following scenario
  • A 21-year-old man is found
  • guilty of burglary for the second time.
  • This time he has taken a television set.
  • Which of the following sentences
  • do you consider appropriate for such a case?
    Why?
  • Fine Prison Community Service Suspended
    Sentence
  • Any other sentence

5
Noncustodial Sentences
  • Legal sanctions handed out to offenders that
  • do not require time served in a correctional
    facility.
  • Alternatives to incarceration include
  • Monetary sanctions Fines, day fines, victim
    compensation, community service, and donation
    penalties.
  • Community supervision Probation, house arrest,
    and electric monitoring.

6
Fines
  • The fine is a penalty imposed on a convicted
    offender by a court, or in some countries, by
    another arm of the criminal justice system,
    requiring that he or she pay a specified sum of
    money.
  • Fixed-sum rate system specific offenses are
    allocated a certain value, and offenders are
    fined according to the offenses they commit..
  • Day fine a criminal penalty based on the amount
    of money an offender earns in a days work. The
    fine amount is also linked to the severity of the
    crime. The judge equates the crime to punishment
    units and punishment units equate to monetary
    terms, i.e., 10 punishment units equals 10 days
    pay (higher for high income offenders and lower
    for low income offenders).

7
Day Fines
  • Advantages (1) provides a balance between the
    crime committed (seriousness) and the offenders
    ability to pay for the crime (2) provides courts
    and alternative to incarceration.
  • Countries U.S., Europe, Scandinavia, Cuba,
    Costa Rica, Bolivia (Finland which pioneered this
    penal reform in 1921).
  • Sentence length The maximum number of days
    varies from country to country. In Denmark it is
    60 days, while in Germany it is 360 days.
  • Examples Sweden and Germany. In Sweden the day
    fine is meant to economically deprive offenders
    and are therefore used primarily for less serious
    offenses (about half of all property and violent
    crime convictions). In Germany day fines are a
    replacement for imprisonment and therefore use
    them even for serious offenses (approximately 75
    of all property offenses and 66 of all violent
    offenses).

8
Victim Compensation
  • Restitution is when an offender is required or
    volunteers to pay money to make reparation for
    harm resulting from a criminal offense. Payment
    is made by the offender and is received by the
    victim, his or her representative, or a public
    fund for victims of crime.
  • The idea of paying crime victims for losses,
    damage, or injuries predates formal criminal
    justice systems. In ancient times, Babylonian,
    Greek, Roman, and Jewish law all contained
    provisions for compensation to be paid by
    offenders.
  • Example Islamic countries consider diyya as a
    replacement to retaliation. Diyya is
    compensation rendered to a victim or victims
    family for the commission of a felony, i.e.,
    willful murder with a weapon. Payment may be
    made by the offenders family or the government.

9
Community Service
  • Community service is when an offender is asked to
    pay back the community by performing a set
    number of hours of unpaid work for a
    not-for-profit agency.
  • Countries Although community service can be
    traced back to ancient times, by the late 1990s,
    community service as an accepted correctional
    practice was accepted in the United Kingdom,
    Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Netherlands,
    Finland, Germany, France, and the United States.
  • Examples In France, community service codes
    were being used in addition to the prison option
    rather than instead of it (net widening). In the
    UK and the US, community service is used both as
    a alternative to incarceration and as a
    supplement to probation.

10
Donation Penalties
  • Germany
  • Misdemeanor offenses only
  • A misdemeanor offender can avoid a criminal trial
    and conviction (and thus a criminal record) by
    paying a sum of money to the victim, a charitable
    organization, or the state. The offender
    acknowledges his responsibility and acts in a
    socially commendable way.
  • The donation penalty is voluntary and not
    considered a fine sentence because it occurs
    prior to conviction.
  • Misdemeanors in Germany include aggravated
    assault, fraud, extortion, and most economic and
    environmental offenses.

11
Probation
  • A key characteristic of contemporary probation
  • practices around the world is
  • that it attempts to reintegrate the offender into
    society.
  • The offender is making a symbolic apology and
  • the community is making a symbolic forgiveness.
  • Of all the forms of supervising offenders in the
    community, probation is the most common. There
    are many variations worldwide.
  • Examples Japan uses professional probation
    officers and volunteer workers China uses the
    police or community units and in Indonesia,
    probation is implemented by the office of the
    prosecutor. Canada, England, and the U.S. have
    the highest rates of probation.

12
House Arrest and Electronic Monitoring
  • House arrest offenders are sentenced to terms of
    incarceration, but they serve those terms in
    their own homes i.e., curfews, part-time,
    full-time.
  • Countries Australia, Iraq, Thailand, Canada,
    England, Wales, and the U.S.
  • Electronic monitoring is a surveillance technique
    often used in conjunction with house arrest. It
    has also been used for intensive probation
    supervision, supervision of parolees, pretrial
    defendants, temporary detention of juveniles,
    gang supervision, and narcotic surveillance.
  • Countries England, Sweden, The Netherlands,
    Germany, France, Switzerland, and the U.S.

13
Corporal Punishment
  • Any sentence in which a persons body is
    subjected to physical pain such as flogging,
    mutilation, electric shock, or branding.
  • Five countries that have the use of corporal
    punishment as a sentencing option Qatar,
    Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Singapore.
    Zimbabwe has the highest rate of incidents of
    corporal punishment (flogging or caning is most
    common).
  • Islamic law also prescribes corporal punishment.
    Societies faithful to Islamic Law have little
    choice but to carry out these penalties.
  • Examples of Islamic Law Countries Saudi Arabia,
    United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Iran, Sudan,
    Singapore, Bahamas.
  • Islamic law methods include flogging, caning,
    whipping with cat-o-nine tails, amputation, and
    cross-amputations.
  • Cultural and traditional methods include Female
    genital mutilation (removal of part of or all of)
    which is common in 28 African nations, Egypt,
    Oman, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates
    (approximately 6,000 per day / over 135 million
    of worlds female population). Not used as a
    sanction but to control sexual behavior.

14
Islamic Law Rationale toCorporal Punishment
  • Bodily penalties
  • Punishment designed to avoid unreasonable
    limitation on individual freedom (in contrast to
    imprisonment).
  • Severe physical pain acts as a deterrent (as
    opposed to imprisonment).
  • Allows the criminal to resume work and he is not
    prevented from supporting his family.
  • Considered an act of penance so the offender can
    resume his life as a normal citizen.
  • Prison is only used for recidivists (third or
    fourth time). For example, for first time theft
    hand amputation second time other hand
    amputated third time, amputation of foot or
    imprisonment until repentance.

15
Death Penalty
  • The penalty of death has been a sentencing option
    since the beginning of civilization.
  • In 2004, 118 nations of the world had outlawed
    the death penalty by law or in practice (all of
    European Union) while 78 retained its use
    (Amnesty International).
  • In 2003, China (726 executions), Iran (108),
    Saudi Arabia, Viet Nam (64), and the U.S. (65)
    had the highest rates of executions. In
    contrast, Japan has executed less than fifteen
    people since 1993.

16
Death Penalty(contd)
  • Although the international trend is to abolish
    the death penalty (as a human rights issue),
    international courts have not specifically ruled
    that the death penalty is inhumane or degrading
    punishment.
  • Methods include Hanging, beheading, firing
    squad, lethal injection, electrocution, and
    stoning.
  • Primary justifications deterrence and
    retribution.
  • Types of crimes justified murder, drug
    offenses, violent crimes (rape, robbery), tax
    fraud, pimping, adultery, sodomy, apostasy,
    treason. (In other words, crimes that directly
    threaten people homicide, stealing, violations
    of community religious norms, and sexual
    offenses).

17
Death Penalty
  • Is it more cruel to know exactly when you will
    die
  • and be forced to sit idly by until the moment
    arrives
  • Or,
  • To know you are scheduled to die but not whether
    it will be this afternoon or 10 years from now
    (Japan)?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com