Rad Tech 265 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Rad Tech 265

Description:

Rad Tech 265 More Digital Imaging Digital Fluoroscopy Radiation dose Patient dose for DF is significantly less than conventional fluoro At 7.5 pulses/second DF has a ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:190
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: occonline2
Category:
Tags: film | rad | tech | thin

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Rad Tech 265


1
Rad Tech 265
  • More Digital Imaging

2
Digital Fluoroscopy
  • Radiation dose
  • Patient dose for DF is significantly less than
    conventional fluoro
  • At 7.5 pulses/second DF has a 75 drop in
    exposure
  • At 3 pulses/sec a 90 reduction in dose
  • The lower dose is obviously advantageous for
    pediatric work.

3
Types of DF
  • The most common methodology is to add a CCD to
    the video chain.
  • A truly digital system can be either indirect or
    direct.
  • Pulse progressive fluoroscopy
  • Uses a high frequency generator with regular mA
    values

4
Digital Fluoroscopy Room
5
Flat panel vs. Image Intensifier
Flat panel
II
Field coverage / size advantage to flat panel
Image distortion advantage to flat panel
6
Flat vs. Fat
7
Direct DF
  • In direct capture or direct to digital systems,
    x-ray energy is not converted to light. Instead,
    it is captured by a thin film transistor matrix
    of a material such as amorphous selenium that
    changes it into electronic signals. No
    intensifying screen is required, and none of the
    energy is lost through scatter, as happens when
    x-ray energy is converted to light on its way to
    display of an image.

8
Indirect DF
  • The indirect capture systems, including some flat
    panel displays that can be integrated into analog
    systems, are similar conceptually to the
    traditional film-screen technology. In one
    version, a cesium iodide scintillator captures
    the x-rays as they exit the patient and converts
    them to light. This light is turned into
    electronic signals by a matrix of amorphous
    silicon sensors. Each sensor corresponds to a
    single pixel of the image and is connected to a
    readout line. The signals from each cell in the
    matrix are read out in sequence row by row to
    obtain the image. High information transfer rates
    permit the display of moving images.

9
Indirect v. Direct
  • Notice, that the comparison of direct v. indirect
    digital fluoroscopy is the same as direct v.
    indirect digital radiography.
  • In the indirect systems, the photons are
    converted to a light image first before being
    digitized.

10
Direct v. Indirect
11
Direct v. Indirect Resolution
12
Digital v Conventional Film
13
Digital v. Analog
14
Acquisition steps
15
Image Manipulation with DF
  • Pan/zoom, background noise reduction, adjustable
    contrast and brightness, edge enhancement,
    quantitative analysis of vessel diameter and
    stenosis severity, subtraction capabilities,
    roadmapping, and bolus chase are common.

16
Pixels (matrix)
17
Matrix size
32 x 32
128 x 128
18
Matrix size
128 x 128
512 x 512
19
Edge enhancement
20
Bits (gray scale)
21
Bits
4 bits
8 bits
22
Temporal averaging
23
Last image hold (lih)
24
DSA
25
DSA
26
DSA
27
Digital Tomosynthesis reduce structured noise
  • 3 cm above detector
  • 9 views, to - 30
  • 1.4 x dose

Tomographic ramp
Niklason, L.T. et.al. Radiology 205399-406
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com