The Value of the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 81
About This Presentation
Title:

The Value of the

Description:

The Value of the Permit Process Robert Rice, Josephine County Building Safety Director Introduction/Welcome Personal Background: 10 years in Construction ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:221
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 82
Provided by: Rober299
Category:
Tags: rescue | urban | value

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Value of the


1
The Value of the Permit Process Robert Rice,
Josephine County Building Safety Director
2
Introduction/Welcome
  • Personal Background
  • 10 years in Construction/Destruction
  • Returned to College AAS Manufacturing CAD/CAM -
    RCC
  • 7 Years in Engineering Firm as a Drafter doing
    structural, mechanical, electrical plumbing
    plans using AutoCAD
  • 3 Years w/ Engineering Firms as a Structural
    Designer
  • 4 Years as Plans Examiner for Jo Co Building
    Safety
  • Josephine County Building Safety Director since
    2007

3
Certifications
  • State of Oregon A-level Plans Examiner
  • State of Oregon Residential Plans Examiner
  • State of Oregon Residential Inspector
  • State of Oregon Post-Earthquake Evaluation
  • State of Oregon Manuf. Dwelling Inspector
  • State of Oregon Inspector Certification
  • ICC Residential Inspector
  • ICC Building Plans Examiner
  • ICC Residential Plans Examiner
  • ICC Building Official Legal / Administrative
  • ICC Fire Plans Examiner

4
Other Related Interests/Involvement
  • RCC Part Time Instructor
  • AutoCAD, CADkey, DataCAD
  • Blueprint Reading I II (10 years)
  • President of the Southern Oregon Chapter of the
    International Code Council (ICC) representing 15
    jurisdictions in our region
  • Actively Involved in code changes at the State
    and National level to help make better codes

5
Topics
  • History of Building Codes
  • Model Code Development
  • Oregons Code Adoption Process
  • Permitting Process
  • Inspections
  • Certificate of Occupancy

6
  • The History of Building Codes

7
Babylonian Empire of Hammurabi
  • Oldest know written code pertaining to building
    construction.
  • Around 2000 B.C.
  • However, it was more about prescribing punishment
    than how to build.

8
Building Code of Hammurabi
  • Translations
  • 228 If a builder has built a house for a man and
    his work is not strong, and if the house he has
    built falls in and kills the householder, that
    builder shall be slain.

9
Building Code of Hammurabi
  • Translations
  • 230 If the child of the householder be killed,
    the child of that builder shall be slain.
  • 231 If the slave of the householder be killed,
    he shall give slave for slave to the householder

10
Building Code of Hammurabi
  • Translations
  • 232 If goods have been destroyed, he shall
    replace all that has been destroyed
  • 233 If a builder has built a house for a man,
    and his work is not done properly and a wall
    shifts, then that builder shall make that wall
    good with his own silver

11
The earliest Modern Building codes were a
result of tragic catastrophes. Burning of Rome
64 A.D. The rebuilding of the city, public
and private, was closely monitored and
controlled.
12
London Fire 1866 5 days/nights 15,000
buildings destroyed Parliament enacted a
building code called London Building Act
13
  • Chicago Fire - 1871
  • 2 days/nights
  • 17,000 buildings destroyed
  • 250 lives lost
  • 100,000 homeless due to fire
  • 60 insurance companies went bankrupt

14
  • Early controls in the United States
  • Wooden chimneys were forbidden in New York as
    early as of 1648 and inspectors were appointed.
  • Fire district created in 1766 where ..all
    buildings shall be made of stone or brick and
    roofed with tile or slate.

15
  • Pre-1994 Legacy Code Groups
  • BOCA (Northern and Eastern States)
  • Building Officials and Code Administrators
    International, Inc.
  • Established 1915
  • ICBO (Western States)
  • International Conference of Building Officials
  • Established 1922
  • SBCCI (Southern States)
  • Southern Building Code Congress International,
    Inc. (SBCCI).
  • Established 1940


16
  • Since the early part of the last century, these
    nonprofit organizations developed the three
    separate sets of model codes used throughout the
    United States.


17
  • Although regional code development has been
    effective and responsive to our countrys needs,
    the time came for a single set of codes.
  • The nations three model code groups responded by
    merging into the International Code Council (ICC)
    and by developing codes without regional
    limitations known as the International Codes.


18
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL
www.iccsafe.org
  • The International Code Council (ICC) was
    established in 1994 as a nonprofit organization
    dedicated to developing a single set of
    comprehensive and coordinated national model
    construction codes.


19
  • ICC Vision
  • Protecting the health, safety, and welfare of
    people by creating better buildings and safer
    communities.

20
  • ICC Mission
  • Providing the highest quality codes,
  • standards, products, and services for all
  • concerned with the safety and performance
  • of the built environment.

21
So, who are these people that actually writes the
codes?

22
  • Lawmakers in
  • Washington DC ?

23
  • Lawmakers in
  • Washington DC

24
INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL
  • Code Development Process


25
  • 13 ICC I-Codes
  • Building
  • International Building Code (IBC)
  • International Residential Code (IRC)
  • Fire
  • International Fire Code (IFC)
  • International Wildland Urban Interface Code
    (IWUIC)
  • Plumbing and Mechanical
  • International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
  • International Mechanical Code (IMC)
  • International Plumbing (IPC)
  • International Private Sewage Disposal Code
    (IPSDC)

26
  • 13 ICC I-Codes (cont)
  • Existing Buildings
  • International Existing Building Code (IEBC)
  • International Property Maintenance Code (IPMC)
  • Specialty
  • International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
  • ICC Performance Code for Buildings and Facilities
  • International Zoning Code (IZC)

27
  • Characteristics of International Codes
  • Each code is comprehensive
  • All codes are coordinated and compatible with
    each other
  • All codes are developed according to the same
    process in the same forum
  • All codes reference consensus national standards

28
(No Transcript)
29
  • Coordination of I-codes
  • Defined scope of each code
  • Interdependence and reliance on the entire family
    of codes - cross referencing and duplication of
    provisions within code scopes
  • Issues resolved in a single and central public
    forum
  • Single interpretation applies to all codes

30
Development Process Goal Utilize a process
open to all parties with safeguards to avoid
domination by proprietary interests. ICC
Governmental Consensus Process achieves this with
the final vote resting with those enforcing the
codes.
31
  • The players
  • Code officials
  • Design professionals/consultants
  • Trade associations
  • Builders/contractors
  • Manufacturers/suppliers
  • Government agencies
  • Property owner/maintenance groups
  • Insurance companies
  • Anyone with an interest

32
Gary Ehrlich National Home Builders Association
33
Kelly Cobeen, P.E. Cobeen and Associates, Inc
34
Professor Dan Dolan, P.E. S.E. University of
Washington
35
Ed Keith, P.E. American Plywood Association
36
Randy Shackleford, P.E. Simpson Strong-Tie
37
Robert Rice Building Official
38
  • The Process
  • Hearings are according to Roberts Rules of
    Order where motions are made, discussed and
    voted on.
  • Open
  • Transparent
  • Balance of Interest
  • Due Process
  • Appeals Process
  • Consensus

39
Code Changes Submitted
Code Changes Printed Distributed
Supplement Or New Edition Published
Code Development Hearing
I-CODE DEVELOPMENT CYCLE
Final Action Hearing
Public Hearing Results Printed Distributed
Public Comments Printed Distributed
Public Comments Sought on Public Hearing Results
40
(No Transcript)
41
Code Development Hearing
  • 13 Code Committees. One for each code, except
  • IBC 4 Subcommittees
  • IFC IWUIC combined
  • IPC IPSDC combined
  • IPMC IZC combined
  • IRC 2 Subcommittees
  • Anyone can attend and testify. No cost to attend
    the hearings

42
Code Committees
  • Materially affected interests represented
  • Not less than 33 of each committee is to be
    regulators
  • All meetings in public forum
  • All actions and reasons for action published

43
Code Development Hearing(Speaking to the
Committee)
  • Committee action
  • Approval as Submitted (AS)
  • Approval as Modified (AM)
  • Disapproval (D)

44
Code Development Hearing(Speaking to the
Committee)
  • Committee action
  • Approval as Submitted (AS)
  • Approval as Modified (AM)
  • Disapproval (D)
  • Assembly action
  • All members of ICC can vote in response to
    committee action (e.g. Overturn committee action)
  • Successful assembly action results in an
    automatic public comment

45
(No Transcript)
46
Public Comment Submittal
  • Allows anyone to submit a comment (Public
    Comment) in response to the results of the Code
    Development Hearing

47
Public Comment Submittal
  • Disagree with the committee action
  • Disagree with the assembly action
  • Propose revisions (modifications) to the code
    change. Further revisions proposed in legislative
    format.
  • Public Comments are then published in the Final
    Action Agenda

48
(No Transcript)
49
Final Action Hearing(Speaking to the Assembly)
  • Anyone can attend and testify. No cost to attend
    the hearings.
  • Agenda
  • Consent agenda Block vote on all code changes
    which did not receive a public comment or
    successful assembly action
  • Individual Consideration Agenda Vote
    individually on each code change which received a
    public comment or successful assembly action

50
Final Action Hearing
  • Final vote on whether or not to change the code
    rests with the Governmental Member
    Representatives those who enforce the code and
    are charged with the publics safety
  • Open, fair and objective with no proprietary
    interest

51
Bill Bryant Moderator - ICC Staff
52
Final Action Hearing Assembly casts final votes
53
Final vote after support and opposition speakers
54
Results of Code Development
  • First edition of full family of I-Codes in 2000
  • Editions follow every 3 years after 2000
  • Intervening Supplement between Editions

55
Conclusions
  • The ICC remains dedicated to a single family of
    comprehensive and coordinated model codes. The
    ICC process allows all interests to participate
    in the code development process.

56
State of Oregon
  • Prior to 1973 the State of Oregon had codes in
    place for
  • Electrical
  • Boilers
  • Elevators
  • Mobile Homes
  • Plumbing (But, permits/insps not required)

57
State of Oregon
  • Prior to 1973 some communities/cities had adopted
    other codes such as building and mechanical
  • Unfortunately, this lead to the lack of
    uniformity across the state

58
State of Oregon
  • In 1973 the state legislature passed a law
    requiring state-wide specialty codes for
    structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing,
    etc.
  • A key concept of the legislation was state-wide
    uniformity

59
State of Oregon
  • Building Codes Division is charged through
    Statute to adopt and implement codes to ensure
    safe buildings.

60
State Adoption Process
  • Process starts with the appropriate model code
    (Typically an ICC code)
  • Any interested person can submit a code change
    proposal that meets certain criteria defined in
    statute.
  • The proposals are reviewed by committee.
  • Any person can attend and testify.

61
State Adoption Process (Cont.)The Committee
  • The committee is made up of industry
    representatives, Building Officials, Engineers
    and others.
  • It serves the purpose of reviewing the proposed
    changes and adoption of each specialty code

62
State Adoption Process (Cont.)
  • Committee makes recommendation to the appropriate
    board.
  • Board reviews the proposal and sends
    recommendation to the Director of BCD for
    approval or denial.

63
State Adoption Process (Cont.)The Board
  • The committee is made up of industry
    representatives, Building Officials, Engineers
    and others.
  • The Board is permanent and serves the purpose of
    dealing with all the issues regarding each
    specialty code.

64

State Adoption Process (Cont.)The end result

State Code Changes
In the case of the residential code, the 2003 IRC
model code became our 2005 Oregon Residential
Specialty Code
65
Josephine County
  • Through statute, local jurisdictions can
    establish a building safety department and assume
    the duties of administering the states codes
    locally.

66
Scope of the Residential Code
  • R101.2 Scope. The provisions of the Oregon
    Residential Specialty Code shall apply to the
    construction, alteration, movement, enlargement,
    replacement, repair, equipment, use and
    occupancy, location, removal and demolition of
    detached one- and two-family dwellings .

67
Purpose of the Residential Code
  • R101.3 Purpose. The purpose of this code is to
    provide minimum requirements to safeguard the
    public safety, health and general welfare through
    affordability, structural strength, means of
    egress facilities, stability, sanitation, light
    and ventilation, energy conservation and safety
    to life and property from fire and other hazards
    attributed to the built environment.

68

The Permitting Process Application for
permit Plan review when required Permit
issuance Inspections Certificate of Occupancy
(for new construction)

69
The Permit Process
  • Permit Application
  • Plan Review
  • Inspections
  • Certificate of
  • Occupancy

70
Value-added service
  • Upon completion of permit / inspection process
    there is assurance that the building meets the
    States minimum code

71
Permits and Inspections Required
  • R108.4 Work commencing before permit issuance.
    Any person who commences any work on a building
    or structure before obtaining the necessary
    permits shall be subject to an investigation fee
    equal to the permit fee that shall be in addition
    to the required permit fees.

72
Permits and Inspections Required
  • R109.1 Inspections. Construction or work for
    which a permit is required shall be subject to
    inspection by the building official and such
    construction or work shall remain accessible and
    exposed for inspection purposes until
    approved..It shall be the duty of the permit
    applicant to cause the work to remain accessible
    and exposed for inspection purposes. Neither the
    building official nor the jurisdiction shall be
    liable for expense entailed in the removal or
    replacement of any material required to allow
    inspection.

73
Work done without permits
  • R109.4 Approval required. Work shall not be done
    beyond the point indicated in each successive
    inspection without first obtaining the approval
    of the building official.
  • Any portions that do not comply shall be
    corrected and such portion shall not be covered
    or concealed until authorized by the building
    official.

74
  • Procedures for work done without permits
  • Provide a scaled floor plan drawing(s) to the
    Building Department for plan review the same as
    for new construction showing
  • Walls, doors, windows, with dimensions and room
    name/use.
  • Fire Life safety information such as smoke
    detectors, emergency escapes and rescue openings,
    stair riser heights tread depths, handrails,
    etc.
  • After plan review, obtain the necessary permits.
  • Correct/repair any items resulting from the plan
    review.
  • Request inspections once the work is complete.

75
  • Obtain a permit for the work and hire an Oregon
    licensed Plumber to inspect the plumbing system
    and correct any deficiencies. Once complete, the
    Plumber is to provide a letter to the Building
    Department stating that the work done complies
    with the applicable plumbing code.
  • Obtain a permit and hire an Oregon licensed
    Electrician to inspect the electrical system and
    correct any deficiencies. Once complete, the
    Electrician is to provide a letter to the
    Building Department stating that the work done
    complies with the applicable electrical code.
  • Note The steps outlined above are an attempt to
    primarily verify, to the extent possible, that
    fire and life-safety concerns comply with the
    states minimum code. Items not seen cannot be
    verified such as footing reinforcement, wall
    insulation/vapor barrier, framing, etc.
    Therefore, a certificate of occupancy will NOT
    be issued.

76
The project lacks Value when done without
permits / inspections
77
  • Our challenge is to use the building code as a
    tool and not an impediment to the construction
    industry, to adopt appropriate codes and to
    facilitate the construction of buildings that are
    safe., Mark Long, Director Building Codes
    Division

78
(No Transcript)
79
(No Transcript)
80
(No Transcript)
81
  • For additional information
  • Oregon Building Codes Division
  • www.cbs.state.or.us/external/bcd/
  • International Code Council
  • www.iccsafe.org
  • Josephine County Building Safety
  • www.co.josephine.or.us (Select Building Safety)
  • Oregons Current Codes
  • www.ecodes.biz
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com