Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Evidence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Evidence

Description:

Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Evidence & Practice Professor John G.F. Cleland Department of Cardiology, Hull York Medical School University of Hull – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:359
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: JohnGFC
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Telemonitoring for Heart Failure Evidence


1
Telemonitoring for Heart FailureEvidence
Practice
  • Professor John G.F. Cleland
  • Department of Cardiology,
  • Hull York Medical SchoolUniversity of Hull
  • Kingston-upon-Hull
  • UK

Conflict of Interest I have received honoraria
and/or research support from Philips, Bosch, GE,
Alere and St Jude
2
Survival of Patients with a Primary Discharge
Diagnosis of Heart Failure England Wales
2009-2010
  • Audit

About 1 million people affected in the
UK 450,000 admissions per year (65,000 in first
diagnostic position) N 19,240 (about 30 of
all expected cases) Median age 79 years lt65 years
3,000 65-75 years 4,000 75-85 years
7,000 gt85 years 5,000
Cleland et al HEART 2011
3
TeleHealthWhy is it Likely to Become Essential?
  • More patients with long-term conditions
  • More older people
  • Longer survival with illness
  • Better primary secondary prevention
  • Fewer professionals to provide health-care
  • Smaller proportion of population of working age
  • Loss of migrant workforce as economies rival UK
  • Better paid or more attractive / less stressful
    jobs
  • More monitoring required
  • Higher expected standards of care
  • More treatments that need to be monitored
  • More things that can be monitored

4
TeleHealthWhy is it Likely to Become Essential?
  • Patient preference Convenience
  • Patients, Carers, Staff
  • Reduced Costs
  • Buildings, Staff, Transport
  • Environmental impact
  • Transport
  • Parking
  • Buildings
  • Better record keeping !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5
The Opportunity of Chronic Illness
  • Most patients soon learn routines
  • Or have relatives / friends that do
  • Most patients are interested in maintaining or
    improving their health
  • Patients are an inexpensive but neglected
    health-care provider opportunity
  • Invest in patients
  • Education
  • Active Partnership
  • Empowerment

6
TeleHealth - What Might it Achieve?
Ultimate Intermediate
7
TEN-HMSThe Trans-European NetworkHome-Care
Management SystemPatients about to be discharged
from hospital after an exacerbation of chronic
heart failure
54 of Patients Aged gt70 years
(Published JACC 2005)
8
TEN-HMS
Reduction in Mortality NTS or HTM v UC Absolute
16.4 Relative 36
Mortality
No reduction in hospitalisation Shortening of
hospital stay with HTM
p lt 0,05
Cleland et al JACC 2005
9
TEN-HMS
How do you feel about your health since
receiving Telemonitoring?
much safer
no change
much more anxious
safer
more anxious
Undef.
10
TEN-HMS
Achieving Therapeutic Target
Patient Clinical Status




240 Days
120 Days
240 Days
differences between HTM and other groups. No
difference between UC and NTS
11
TEN-HMS Total Patient Contacts
Contacts Per 1,000 Days Alive and Out of Hospital

Plt0.01 HTM v NTS
under-reporting of events likely in this group
12
Structured Telephone Supportn 5,563(Cochrane
Review)
Mortality
  • New Trials
  • Tele-HF
  • TEHAF

HR 0.88 (0.76-1.01) p0.08
Inglis et al 2010
13
Home Telemonitoringn 2,710 (Cochrane Review)
  • New Trials
  • TIM-HF
  • COMPASS
  • CHAMPION
  • SENSE-HF

Mortality
HR 0.66 (0.54-0.87) plt0.0001
Inglis et al 2010
14
Major Problems with RCTs of Service Delivery
  • Technology differs
  • Telephone Support including Voice Activated
    Systems
  • Physiological telemonitoring
  • Implanted or Not
  • Care usually improves if it is the focus of
    attention
  • Effect in control group
  • Beware before v after comparisons
  • Lack of integration into existing services
  • Puts innovative interventions at a disadvantage
  • Selection of patients at low risk with modern
    treatment

15
Percent of Days Lost To Hospitalisation or Death
TEHAF (12 months)
TEN-HMS (15 months)
TIM-HF (26 months)
8.9 8.4
37.0 21.3 22.6
4.5 6.1
16
What Have We Done for TeleHealth in Hull?
  • Established
  • International reference site (LifeLab) for HF
    epidemiology research
  • International reputation for research excellence
    in telehealth
  • A model telehealth service
  • Grants
  • TEN-HMS
  • Four FP7 grants relating to telehealth heart
    failure
  • EDRF
  • Industry Partnerships
  • Philips, GE, Bosch, Cardiomems, St Jude others
  • Publications
  • gt500 PubMed citations in related fields
  • TEN-HMS, Concept Papers, Editorials
  • Systematic Reviews (EJHF, BMJ Cochrane)
  • Inventions
  • Dynamic risk analysis
  • Complex management algorithms

17
The Hull Model for TeleHealth
  • HeartCycle
  • Heart Failure
  • Post-MI Rehab

Device Implant
Non-Invasive Home Monitoring
Community TeleKiosks Screening Long-Term
Conditions
18
Services for Patients with Heart FailureThe
Kingston-upon-Hull Model
Heart Failure Discharge Nurse
Heart Failure Telemonitoring Nurse
Voluntary Patient-Support Organisations
Community Heart Failure Specialist Nurses
Patients in Hospital
Patients at Home
Family Doctor (NT-proBNP)
Specialist Clinics
19
(No Transcript)
20
Where Next?
  • Interactive TV
  • New monitoring technologies
  • Implanted devices
  • More intelligent use of the patient data
  • Investing in patients as health-care providers

Centre for Telehealth
21
The Hull Heart Failure Life-Lab30,000
patient-years of follow-upLargest, Longest
Follow-up, Epidemiologically-Representative
Cohort of Heart Failure in the WorldRich in
phenotyping, serial biomarker and outcome data
22
HeartCycle Programme
  • Shift from crisis detection to health maintenance
  • Health Maintenance Envelope
  • More optimistic
  • Better way to engage/motivate patients
  • More active management
  • More activity likely to hold actors attention
  • Clinical calibration
  • Addresses the issue of false alerts
  • Personalised Careplan
  • Treatments
  • Ideal monitoring envelope

23
Motivation feedback on measures and trends, what
they mean and what to do about them Education
on healthy lifestyle, reasons for treatments,
self management
Health-Care Provider
Secondary Loop
Patient / Carer
Analysis
Primary Loop 70 of Care Decisions
Monitor
Intelligent, integrated, multi-measure (time
type) personalised analysis
Communication System
24
Opportunities for TeleHealth
  • Change in Philosophy
  • Investment in patients (rather than experts)
  • Patients as first and possibly main tier of
    healthcare
  • Communication
  • Patient, community health social services,
    specialists
  • Common health record
  • Checked (at least in part) by the patient
    themselves
  • Decision support analysis
  • Patient professional support
  • Research potential
  • Healthcare innovation
  • Pharmaceutical industry especially
  • Route to faster (ethical) adoption
  • Convenience Preference
  • Patient, Carer, Health Professional
  • Environmental impact

25
Conclusion
  • The first era of telemonitoring is over
  • Time to move from
  • Crisis Detection
  • to
  • Health Maintenance

26
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com