Dose-response Explorer: An Open-source-code Matlab-based tool for modeling treatment outcome as a function of predictive factors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

Dose-response Explorer: An Open-source-code Matlab-based tool for modeling treatment outcome as a function of predictive factors

Description:

Dose-response Explorer: An Open-source-code Matlab-based tool for modeling treatment outcome as a function of predictive factors Gita Suneja Issam El Naqa, Patricia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:316
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: IssamE9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dose-response Explorer: An Open-source-code Matlab-based tool for modeling treatment outcome as a function of predictive factors


1
Dose-response ExplorerAn Open-source-code
Matlab-based tool for modeling treatment outcome
as a function of predictive factors
Gita Suneja Issam El Naqa, Patricia
Lindsay, Andrew Hope, James Alaly, Jeffrey
Bradley, Joseph O. Deasy
Supported by NIH grant R01 CA 85181
2
What is DREX?
  • An open-source-code Matlab-based tool for
  • Modeling tumor control probability (TCP) and
    normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)
  • Evaluating robustness of models
  • Graphing the results for purposes of outcomes
    analysis for practitioners, training for
    residents, and hypothesis-testing for further
    research

3
Motivation Objectives
  • Motivation
  • Cornerstone of treatment planning is the need to
    balance tumor control probability (TCP) with
    normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)
  • Objective
  • Physicians and scientists need a tool that is
    straightforward and flexible in the study of
    treatment parameters and clinical factors

4
Features
  1. Analytical modeling of normal tissue complication
    probability (NTCP) and tumor control probability
    (TCP)
  2. Combination of multiple dose-volume variables and
    clinical variables using multi-term logistic
    regression modeling
  3. Manual selection or automated estimation of model
    parameters
  4. Estimation of uncertainty in model parameters
  5. Performance assessment of univariate and
    multivariate analysis
  6. Capacity to graphically visualize NTCP or TCP
    prediction vs. selected model variable(s)

5
Basic Modules
Data Input
1
Radiobiological model?
2
TCP
NTCP
Model type?
Model type?
3
Analytical
Analytical
Multi-metric
Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) or Critical volume
Poisson or Linear quadratic
Logistic regression
4
Univariate/multivariate performance assessment
Graphical representation
5
Export output
6
Modeling Method I Analytical
  • NTCP
  • Lyman-Kutcher-Burman (LKB) Model (Lyman 1985,
    Kutcher and Burman 1989)
  • Critical Volume Model (Niemierko and Goitein
    1993)
  • TCP
  • Poisson Statistics
  • Linear-quadratic (LQ) Prediction

7
Modeling Method II Multimetric
  • Logistic regression additive sigmoid model
  • Two types of data exploration
  • Manual
  • Automated
  • Determining Model Order by Leave-one-out-Cross-Va
    lidation (Ref. Multi-Variable Modeling of
    Radiotherapy Outcomes Determining Optimal Model
    Size, Deasy et al., poster SU-FF-T-376 )
  • Model parameters estimated by forward selection
    on multiple bootstrap samples

8
Performance Assessment
  • Spearmans Rank Correlation
  • Area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic
    (ROC) curve
  • Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier
    estimator

9
Univariate Graphical Representations
Graph/Plot Description/Function
Self-correlation Color-washed Spearmans cross-correlation image of selected variables and observed outcome
Scatter User selects abscissa and ordinate variables Provides user with visual cues about the discrimination ability of certain factors
Survival curves Use Kaplan-Meier estimates
10
Multivariate Graphical Representations
Graph/Plot Description/Function
Histogram Cumulative plot of observed response (bar graph) and model-predicted response (line graph)
Contour Demonstrates the effect of the model variables on shaping the predicted outcome
Octile Patients are uniformly binned into 8 groups Helps visualized goodness of fit of model
ROC Assess prediction power of model
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Conclusions
  • User-friendly software tool to analyze dose
    response effects of radiation
  • Incorporates treatment and clinical factors, as
    well as biophysical models
  • Various graphical representations
  • Available in the near future on the web at
  • radium.wustl.edu/DREX
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com