An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures

Description:

An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures P-value =0.000 An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures Total in ... Total hip replacement NA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: noo72
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures


1
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
  • Presented by
  • Dr Wasim Anwar
  • Orthopedic B Unit
  • HMC Peshawar

2
Hip Fractures
  • In USA
  • 250.000 hip fractures/year
  • 90 in patients gt50ys old
  • Mortality related to hip fracture 25 at one
    year
  • 80 of patients recover their walking ability,
  • Only 70 recover their ability to perform ADLs
    (activities of daily living)

3
Hip Fractures
  • In the UK
  • 70,000 hip fractures annually
  • 120,000 cases per year by 2015
  • 75 of patients are over 75 years of age
  • 80 are female
  • Hip fractures account for 20 all orthopedic bed
    occupancy

4
Risk Factors
  • Age incidence doubles for each decade after
    50ys
  • Sex 2-3 times higher in women
  • Race 2-3 times higher in white women than in
    nonwhite women
  • Habits Excessive alcohol or caffeine
  • Physical inactivity
  • Low body weight
  • Previous hip fracture
  • Dementia
  • Psychotropic meds
  • Visual impairments
  • Osteoporosis

5
Clinical Assessment
  • History
  • Hx
  • fall in a small percentage it occurs
    spontaneously
  • C/o
  • pain and inability to move the hip or put
    weight
  • Hx other osteoporotic fractures Colle,s
    or vertebral fractures

6
Clinical Assessment Physical Exam
  • Leg externally rotated
  • Shortening
  • May show trochanteric ecchymosis
  • Inability to lift the extended leg
  • ROM is limited and painful
  • Distal neurovascular exam
  • Check the pelvis
  • Move posterior to anterior at the level of iliac
    crests
  • Lateral to medial through the iliac crests

7
CLINICAL PICTURE
  • SYMPTOMS
  • History of trauma,
  • Pain,
  • Swelling,
  • Limited movements.

SIGNS
LOCAL Swelling, Ecchymosis,
Tenderness, Limited movements
Deformity, Length discrepancy,
Abnormal movements, Crepitus
EXTERNAL ROTATION INABILITY TO LIFT EXTENDED LEG
8
Diagnostic Imaging
  • X rays
  • AP and lateral.
  • Check the neck shaft angle 120-130.
  • No results but fracture still suspected AP
    rotated 10-12 - best visualization of femoral
    neck
  • CT scan
  • MRI
  • most sensitive
  • if X rays negative but fracture still suspected
  • Bone scan

9
Hip Fractures
  • Femoral neck 45
  • Intertrochanteric 45
  • Subtrochanteric 10

10
Trabecular Pattern
11
Arterial supply
12
Femoral Neck fracture
  • Intracapsular,
  • disruption of blood supply to femoral head,
  • high incidence of healing complications
    (nonunion, osteonecrosis)
  • Extracapsular

13
Intertrochanteric fracture
  • Intertrochanteric 45
  • extracapsular,
  • no interference with the blood supply of the
    femoral head,
  • less complications
  • Malunion

14
Subtrochanteric Fracture
  • Extacapular
  • Higher rate of complications

15
Treatment Principles
  • Early surgery / 24-48h in patients who are
    medically stable
  • May wait up to 72h to stabilize the pt.
  • Assess cardiac risk
  • Delay in surgery/prolonged bed rest means
  • increased risk of DVT, UTI, pulmonary
    complications, skin breakdown,
  • delayed functional recovery

16
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN)
  • Assessment, within 1 hour of arrival in the
    Emergency Department (ED)
  • Early diagnosis
  • Adequate analgesia before transfer of the patient
    from the ED
  • Rapid transfer to the ward - fast tracking
  • Minimise the delay to definitive surgery
  • A multidisciplinary team approach
  • Postoperative care and rehabilitation

17
Principles for fixation of NOF Fracture
Physiological Age (yr) Functional Status Treatment
lt65 Community ambulator CRIF
ORIF if necessary
65-75 Community ambulator CRIF
Cemented bipolar arthroplasty (if closed reduction unsuccessful)
gt75 Community ambulator Cemented bipolar arthroplasty
gt75 Minimal household ambulator Cemented unipolar arthroplasty
gt75 Household ambulator extremely ill Percutaneous CRIF ( local anesthesia with sedation)
NA Preexistent arthritis Total hip replacement
NA Nonambulator CRIF or nonoperative if extremely ill
18
Treatment Recommendations Based on Russell-Taylor
Classification of Subtrochanteric Fractures
  • IA - Standard ILN
  • IB- Recon Nail
  • IIA- DHS or Recon Nail
  • IIB - DHS e BG or Recon Nail

19
AO Screws Fixation
  • Minimally displaced femoral neck fracture
  • Internal fixation with multiple screws

20
Cephalomedullary Nail
21
Prosthetic replacement
TOTAL ARTHROPLASTY
Femoral neck fracture
HEMIARTHROPLASTY
22
Dynamic Hip Screw
23
Different types of fixations of Subtrochanteric
fracture
24
Rehabilitation
  • Goal independent living
  • Rehabilitation should begin first day after
    surgery with transfer from bed to chair
  • Progress as soon as possible to standing and
    walking (2nd day post op)
  • Promote weight bearing with assistance
    walker

25
SYSTEMIC COMPLICATIONS
  • LONG RECOMBANCY IN BED
  • DVT, PE,,,
  • MORTALITY

26
LOCAL COMPLICATIONS
  • Loss of fixation
  • Malunion COXA VARA
  • Nonunion
  • Avascular necrosis of femoral head
  • Dislocation of the prosthesis
  • Loosening of prosthesis years after surgery

27
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip
Fractures
  • Objective
  • To Minimize the waiting time of definitive Hip
    surgery and cost

28
Materials and Methods
  • Prospective audit, Jan 2011 to April 2011
  • All Patients admitted to orthopedic B unit HMC
    with hip fracture who underwent surgery
  • Patients of Total hip replacement were excluded
    from study

29
Data collection procedure
  • Data collected from clinical notes
  • Admission and operation times
  • Pre-op hospital stay, total hospital stay,
    postoperative hospital stay and total cost of
    surgery were calculated
  • Date of discharge

30
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
Results
31
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
32
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
  • 51 patients
  • Male 23 (45.1) Female 28 (54.9)
  • Mean age 60.56 yrs (range 7 90yrs)
  • In hospital mortality 5.88
  • Type of surgical intervention

1
3
2
DHS (48.5)
Hemiarthroplasty (21.5)
AO screws fixation (17.4)
Recon Nail 12.6
33
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
P-Value 0.0000
34
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
P-value 0.000
35
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
  • Total in hospital mortality 5.88
  • Patients who had surgery within 2-5 days had
    lower in-hospital mortality of 4.1 compared to
    those who waited for surgery gt6 days had in
    hospital mortality 7.4 (p value .001)

36
An audit of pre-operative delay in Hip Fractures
  • Medical conditions delaying surgery increase
    Morbidity and mortality
  • Non-medical delay causes
  • Distress to the patient
  • Increased morbidity and mortality
  • Reduced chance of successful fixation and
    rehabilitation
  • Reduced functional recovery
  • Increased risk of DVT and PE
  • Prolonged hospital stay
  • Increased surgical cost

37
Does delay in surgery after hip fracture lead to
worse outcomes? A multicenter surveyVictor
Novack,Alan Jotkowitz,Ohad Etzion and Avi Porath
  • Objective To estimate the impact of delays in
    surgery for hip fracture on short- and long-term
    outcomes.
  • Setting Seven major tertiary hospitals.
  • Study population- 4633 patients, older than 65
    years admitted with hip fracture during the years
    20012005.
  • Patients who had surgery within 2 days had lower
    mortality (in-hospital, 1-month and 1-year)
    compared to those who waited for surgery gt4 days
    (2.9, 4.0, 17.4 vs. 4.6, 6.1, 26.2,
    respectively).

38
Early Mortality After Hip Fracture Is Delay
Before Surgery Important? Department of Trauma
and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Nottingham,
  • A prospective, observational study of 2660
    patients
  • The mortality was 9 at 30 days, 19 at 90 days,
    and 30 at 1 year.
  • Those operated on without delay had a 30-day
    mortality of 8.7 whom the surgery had been
    delayed b/w 1 4 days had a 30-day mortality of
    7.3. (p 0.51).
  • The 30-day mortality for patients for whom the
    surgery had been delayed for more than four days
    was 10.7, and this small group had significantly
    increased mortality at 90 days (hazard ratio
    2.25 p 0.001) and one year (hazard ratio
    2.4 p 0.001).

39
Conclusions
  • A significant proportion (approx 52) of
    patients wait longer than 6 days before surgery
  • In hospital mortality was 5.88
  • Commonest reason for delay was lack of theatre
    time
  • In our study, evidence suggests that delaying
    surgery increases length of hospital stay and
    cost of surgery
  • Delay in surgery causes distress to the patient
    and impact on functional outcome

40
Limitations Of Study
  • Small sample size
  • Fitter patients
  • Lack of data on morbidity mortality
  • No long term followup

41
Suggestions and Recommendations
  • Operate within 24 hours of admission
  • Increase theater time days
  • Provision of dedicated trauma list in the evening
  • Increase technical and clinical resources
  • Close attention to pre-op medical care to avoid
    delay in surgery
  • More research needed to determine optimum
    management e.g. National Hip Fracture database

42
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com