How did we ever survive without the Blackboard Content System? PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: How did we ever survive without the Blackboard Content System?


1
How did we ever survive without the Blackboard
Content System?
Buckinghamshire Chilterns
UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
  • Dr Helen Fletcher
  • Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College
  • Narayan Prasad
  • Blackboard Global Services

2
Outline of this presentation
  • Examples of issues concerning BCUC
  • Working with the Blackboard Global Services Team
    on the planning for, and implementation of, the
    Blackboard Content System
  • Examples of how we are addressing issues at BCUC
    using the Blackboard Content System

3
Issues concerning BCUC
  • Students need to hold a record of their Personal
    Development Plans
  • Paper, MS Word
  • Faculty staff need to publish their research
    profiles
  • HTML, Faculty webmaster,
  • A module may be taught by several lecturers
  • Difficult with Bb LS 5.5
  • A module might be used by students at BCUC and
    at our Strategic Partner FE Colleges
  • Difficult with Bb LS 5.5

4
More issues concerning BCUC
  • Keeping track of digital copies is becoming
    difficult
  • Multiple unconnected records?
  • Searching for anything is difficult
  • Re-inventing cataloguing?
  • Difficult to ensure everyone is working to the
    same version of a document during the course
    validation process
  • Multiple paper and MS Word versions?
  • Need to ensure the approved course documents are
    available on the Web
  • MS Word to HTML then Webmaster?

5
Rapid Planning Implementation of Content System
  • Objective
  • Satisfy BCUCs vision to manage enterprise
    content using the Blackboard Content System
  • Blackboard Activities
  • Through systematic and structured discussions,
    the
  • fundamental concepts of unified content strategy
    were examined
  • Getting a better understanding of BCUCs content
    lifecycle various phases of content development
    such as creation, review, management and delivery
  • Analysing the content lifecycle to identify the
    players (content producers, reviewers and
    consumers) and issues


6
Rapid Planning Implementation of Content System
(Cont.)
  • Performing a substantive audit of BCUCs content
    and determining the business requirements to
    understand the organisations goals and needs
  • Comprehensively reviewing BCUCs use-cases to
    perform an in-depth analysis
  • Deriving directory structures and content
    authorization to identify access rights for all
    the content based on identified roles for all
    players
  • Designing appropriate metadata to enable proper
    processing and searching of content elements.
  • Outcomes
  • A full implementation of the content system
    complete with directory structures and
    permissions model appropriate for the BCUC
    environment


7
Deliverable Project Implementation Plan
  • Project Implementation Plan
  • BCUC Background
  • Content management vision
  • Tasks Milestones
  • Resources and hardware capacity planning
  • Operations policies and procedures

8
Deliverable Content Planning Implementation
  • Methodology Approach
  • Review of all use-cases
  • Modeling and analysis
  • Producers, reviewers and consumers
  • Products
  • Permissions
  • Directory Structures
  • Metadata analysis and design
  • Mapping to Blackboard Learning, Portal and
    Content System functionalities

9
Personal Development Planning (PDP)
  • Students need a record of their personal
    development plans for
  • job hunt
  • lifelong learning
  • E-portfolio in PDP
  • Simple to write to, with Academic Tutors
  • Passes used as references for employers or
    universities
  • Alumni take it away as a web page

10
Staff Profiles
  • Faculty staff need to publish their research
    interests on the web
  • This is too hard with our normal web
  • E-portfolio can be used and easily publish direct
    to the web

11
Sharing Content
  • A module might be taught jointly by several
    lecturers
  • A module might be taught across our Strategic
    Alliance
  • This collaboration was hard work with Bb LS 5.5
  • The Content System allows easy sharing from a
    tray of files

12
Management of the e-library
  • The library is responsible for the legitimate
    copying of digital materials
  • This is easily managed with e-Reserves
  • Use of Dublin Core metadata ensures easy access
    to learning objects later

13
Course Validation Process
  • Ownership of course development documents by the
    faculty during development
  • Ownership of the formal documents by the
    institution (Academic Registry) once validated
  • Simple publication of necessary documents (eg
    programme specifications) on the web for FOIA and
    TQI

14
Organisations
  • One for each faculty and department to share
    local documents
  • Design, Technology, Health, etc
  • Learning and Information Services, Academic
    Registry, etc
  • One for each committee or working party to share
    formal documents across BCUC
  • Senate, Academic Audit Committee, etc
  • Information Strategy Steering Group, Technical
    Working Party, etc

15
Plans
  • Two faculty champions initially using CS with LS
  • LIS to use the Content System for departmental
    procedures, etc
  • Information Strategy Steering Group and Technical
    Working Party to use for papers for meetings
  • E-portfolio to be used with academic tutors
    through SCPE for PDP

16
Issues
  • Network files versus Bb CS files
  • Traditional website versus Bb CS
  • Training requires careful planning
  • Learning system is easy to use for all
  • Content System is more difficult
  • Policies and procedures to be agreed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com