IAEA 52nd General Conference Senior Regulators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

IAEA 52nd General Conference Senior Regulators

Description:

IAEA 52nd General Conference Senior Regulators Meeting ... Primary TRANSSC role is the periodic review and revision of the international transport safety ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Andr301
Learn more at: http://www-ns.iaea.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IAEA 52nd General Conference Senior Regulators


1
  • IAEA 52nd General ConferenceSenior Regulators
    Meeting3 October 2008
  • EXPERIENCES IN THE USE
  • BY MEMBER STATES
  • OF THE IAEA SAFETY STANDARDS
  • A.-C. Lacoste
  • Chairman of the Commission on Safety Standards

2
Contents
  • The CSS mandate and composition
  • Regular reports at the CSS meetings
  • Reports from the Committees
  • Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
    the MS
  • Recent improvements
  • The use in relation to the safety-related
    Conventions
  • The improved quality and relevance of the Safety
    Standards
  • Strategies in place for the future
  • Conclusions

3
The CSS mandate and composition
  • The Commission on Safety Standards (CSS) is a
    standing body of senior government officials
    holding national responsibilities for
    establishing standards and other regulatory
    documents relevant to nuclear, radiation,
    transport and waste safety.
  • The CSS has a special overview role with regard
    to the Agencys safety standards and provides
    advice to the Director General on the overall
    programme on regulatory aspects of safety.

4
The CSS mandate and composition (Cont.)
  • The functions of the CSS are
  • To provide guidance on the approach and strategy
    for establishing the Agencys safety standards,
    particularly in order to ensure coherence and
    consistency between standards
  • To resolve outstanding issues referred to it by
    the Committees involved in the Agencys
    preparation and review process for safety
    standards
  • To endorse, in accordance with the Agencys
    preparation and review process for safety
    standards, the texts of the Safety Fundamentals
    and Safety Requirements to be submitted to the
    Board of Governors for approval and to determine
    the suitability of Safety Guides to be issued
    under the authority of the Director General
  • To provide general advice and guidance on safety
    standards issues, relevant regulatory issues and
    the Agencys safety standards activities and
    related programmes, including those for promoting
    the worldwide application of the standards.

5
The CSS mandate and composition (Cont.)
  • Composition
  • Senior regulators from Argentina, Australia,
    Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, Egypt, Finland,
    France, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, Republic
    of Korea, Lithuania, Pakistan, Russian
    Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine,
    United Kingdom, United States of America,
    Vietnam
  • Observers Chairmen of AdSec, ICRP and INSAG,
    representatives from the OECD/NEA and from the
    European Commission
  • Chairmen of the four Safety Standards Committees.

6
Regular Reports at the CSS meetings
  • Reports from the CSS members on the application
    of the IAEA Safety Standards is a standing agenda
    item since its 16th meeting in November 2004.
  • 53 Reports presented by Australia, Brazil,
    Canada, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, Rep. of
    Korea, Lithuania, Pakistan, Russian Federation,
    South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Ukraine, United
    Kingdom, United States of America and a regional
    presentation from WENRA.
  • Collection of presentations available on the CSS
    web site http//www-ns.iaea.org/committees/css/

7
Report from the CommitteesNUSSC
  • The use of the SS in the NUSSC area varies
    considerably across MS. Some countries more or
    less take the SS verbatim and make them part of
    their legal system, others use them as reference
    to a greater or lesser extent.
  • All MS take some account of the SS but there is
    no one model. Some use the standards to benchmark
    their national regulation or guidance, but do not
    use them directly except in a few cases.
  • MS with less developed, regulatory systems are
    more likely to use the SS more directly. An
    example is where the MS has only research
    reactors.
  • Another use of the SS was as the baseline for the
    WENRA work and as the basis for the NEA work
    under the MDEP heading.

8
Report from the CommitteesRASSC
  • The International Basic Safety Standards
  • Covers all exposure situations and covers
    occupational exposure, public exposure, medical
    exposure, safety of sources, protection of the
    environment
  • Applies to all facilities and activities
    involving exposure to ionizing radiation
  • Basis or reference point/benchmark for
    regulations in all Member States
  • Currently being revised with active collaboration
    of cosponsors and potential cosponsors. Draft 1.0
    to be reviewed by Safety Standards Committees in
    4th quarter

9
Report from the CommitteesTRANSSC
  • TRANSSC members include Member State
    representatives, typically from the radioactive
    material transport regulatory agency (Competent
    Authorities for Transportation)
  • Primary TRANSSC role is the periodic review and
    revision of the international transport safety
    standard, Regulations for the Safe Transport of
    Radioactive Material (TS-R-1)
  • The IAEA Safety Standard, Regulations for the
    Safe Transport of Radioactive Material (TS-R-1),
    is incorporated world-wide into Member States
    national regulations
  • IAEA and TRANSSC work closely with other UN
    organizations involved in transport of dangerous
    goods to ensure world-wide safety of radioactive
    material transport

10
Report from the CommitteesWASSC
  • The IAEA Safety Standards in the Waste area date
    back to 1961. Since that time the waste safety
    standards have been regularly updated in terms of
    areas covered and format.
  • The Standards in Waste Safety represent
    international consensus on the primary
    requirements and guidance on how to meet these
    requirements.
  • The Waste Safety Standards cover
  • Predisposal Management
  • Disposal
  • Environmental Discharges and Restoration
  • Decommissioning
  • The WASSC is comprised of members from 55 Member
    States and 6 International Organizations
  • The use of the SS in member states was also as
    the baseline for the WENRA work

11
Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
the MS
  • Notable use by MS
  • Formally adopted (i.e. Brazil, China,
    Netherlands, Pakistan).
  • Direct use of standards (i.e. Canada, Czech
    Republic, Germany, India, Korea Rep. of, Russian
    Federation)
  • Used as reference for review of national
    standards (by many other States also by Industry)
    and as benchmark for harmonization

12
Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
the MS
  • WENRA
  • The IAEA Safety Standards were the basis for the
    WENRAs
  • Safety reference levels 
  • WENRA a club of European nuclear regulators
  • A process on a voluntary basis
  • aiming at reaching high and harmonized levels of
    safety across Europe and further improving safety
  • An original approach
  • Not aiming at developing a stringent European
    technical regulation
  • Not establishing new technical standards
  • Rather, having common safety references, based on
    already existing documents such as IAEA SS

13
Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
the MS
  • Development of  safety reference levels 
  • For existing power reactors
  • For interim storage and decommissioning
  • The  safety reference levels  were largely
    based on IAEA safety standards
  • Safety requirements
  • Safety guides
  • In very few cases, completed by national
    regulations
  • Showing that the IAEA SS were well adapted

14
Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
the MS
  • A benchmark has been performed to check these 2
    issues
  • Are the  safety reference levels  covered by
    the national regulations ?
  • Are they implemented by the operators ?
  • WENRA members committed themselves to reach an
    harmonized situation for existing power reactors
    by 2010
  • Update of the national regulations
  • Through the WENRA  safety reference levels ,
    the substance of IAEA standards will be taken
    into account in the national regulations of
    European countries by 2010, and implemented in
    the nuclear facilities

15
Different uses of the IAEA Safety Standards by
the MS
  • Medical application is an important area where
    the CSS highlighted the need for significant
    improvement in the application of the safety
    standards in the Member States
  • Application of Safety Standards in countries
    embarking in Nuclear Power programme is another
    priority identified by the CSS. A specific guide
    is in preparation to assist the MS (presented
    this morning)

16
Recent improvementsThe use in relation to the
safety-related Conventions
  • Some feedback from the 4th CNS review meeting
  • More Contracting Parties reported using, or
    intending to use, IAEA Safety Standards as the
    basis for creation or revision of regulatory
    requirements for nuclear safety (e.g. GS-R-1
    Legal and Governmental Infrastructure and
    supporting safety guides).
  • European countries reported harmonization efforts
    through the voluntary incorporation of WENRA
    Reference Levels, which are based on the IAEA
    Safety Standards.

17
Recent improvementsThe use in relation to the
safety-related Conventions
  • Some feedback from the 4th CNS review meeting
    (Cont.)
  • Substantial progress was reported regarding
    safety management and safety culture, in
    operating organizations and Regulatory Bodies.
    IAEA Safety Requirements (e.g. GS-R-3 The
    Management System for Facilities and Activities
    and supporting safety guides ) were frequently
    referenced.
  • Most Contracting Parties reported the use of IAEA
    Safety Guide NS-G-2.10 Periodic Safety Review of
    Nuclear Power Plants.

18
Recent improvements The improved quality and
relevance of the Safety Standards
  • The quality and relevance of the safety standards
    has significantly increased over the past ten
    years.
  • This has resulted in an increase in
  • their actual use by MS and
  • the commitment of MS and their involvement in the
    review and approval process

19
Recent improvements Strategies in place for the
future
  • Complements the presentation from the Secretariat
    this afternoon
  • After 50 years of essentially bottom-up approach,
    the Safety Fundamentals SF-1 marks the beginning
    of a top-down approach leading to a complete and
    consistent Series
  • A CSS roadmap was approved at the May 2008
    meeting for the long-term objectives
  •  Safety measures and security measures must be
    designed and implemented in an integrated
    manner  as mentioned in the point 6 of the
    roadmap.

20
Recent improvements Strategies in place for the
future (cont.)
  • A paper on structure and format for the safety
    requirements was approved at the September 2008
    meeting, as well as criteria for the optimization
    of the collection of safety guides and a template
    for new DPPs (decision making tool for new
    guides)
  • User-friendliness was also addressed by the
    roadmap
  • A process is engaged for ensuring harmonized use
    of terms and a rigorous approval process of the
    safety glossary
  • Processes with stakeholder involvement are being
    established for the effectiveness of the feedback
    mechanisms

21
Conclusions
  • In 2006, the unified safety fundamentals SF-1 was
    published. It states the 10 fundamental
    principles to be applied in order to achieve the
    fundamental safety objective.
  • The CSS shares with the Safety Standards
    Committees and the Secretariat some objectives to
    be reached in order to achieve a worldwide use by
    the MS of the IAEA Safety Standards.

22
Conclusions some objectives for a worldwide use
of the IAEA Safety Standards
  • For the Safety Standards Series
  • Completeness,
  • Logical top-down relationship,
  • Consistency,
  • User friendliness,
  • Manageable number of publications
  • For the Safety Standards content
  • Consensus on high level of safety and best
    international practices
  • For the Safety Standards review and approval
    process
  • rigour,
  • transparency,
  • high level approval,
  • effectiveness of feedback mechanisms
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com