The - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The

Description:

... also in 1SM 24) The Issue Did Ellen White s call to prophetic ministry and her reception of prophetic revelations through visions mean that every word ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Stand217
Learn more at: https://www.andrews.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The


1
The Sacred andthe Common
  • Denis Fortin
  • Writings of Ellen G. White

2
The Issue
  • In 1906, Dr. David Paulson wrote to Ellen White
    that I was led to conclude and most firmly
    believe from my early training that every word
    that you ever spoke in public or private, that
    every letter you wrote under any and all
    circumstances, was as inspired as the ten
    commandments. (Quoted by Ellen White in RH,
    August 30, 1906 also in 1SM 24)

3
The Issue
  • Did Ellen Whites call to prophetic ministry and
    her reception of prophetic revelations through
    visions mean that every word subsequently spoken
    or written by her was inspired?
  • Obviously the answer is No.
  • But this answer raises many new questions.

4
Biblical prophets were not infallible
  • "Abraham deceived, Moses lost his patience and
    spoke hasty words, David instructed Joab how to
    have Uriah killed, Nathan agreed with David's
    plans to build a house for the Lord, and then had
    to reverse his statement. All of these men were
    prophets, but the possession of the prophetic
    gift did not mean moment-by-moment direction of
    all their words and acts." (T. H. Jemison,
    "Inspiration and the Ellen G. White Writings," in
    The Spirit of Prophecy Treasure Chest
    Washington, D.C. Review and Herald, 1960, 63.)

5
How can we distinguish?
  • Then, if all they said was not inspired, how much
    was given by divine direction?
  • How do we know what was inspired and what was
    not?
  • Nowhere in the Bible is there a clear statement
    on this subject.

6
Ellen Whites writings
  • "Mother never made the claim, as some have said,
    that everything she ever wrote at any time was
    inspired. I told them that Mother, like every
    other prophet of God, had her own private life,
    and she spoke and wrote about matters of finance,
    about her household, her farm, her chickens, her
    horses, and her dairy, and that there was no
    claim that she was speaking regarding these
    matters with the voice of inspiration." (W. C.
    White to J. W. Watt, March 7, 1915, quoted in
    Jerry Moon, W. C. White and Ellen G. White, 414.)

7
Ellen Whites writings
  • In response to God's call, "I gave myself, my
    whole being, to God, to obey His call in
    everything, and since that time my life has been
    spent in giving the message, with my pen and in
    speaking before large congregations. It is not I
    who controls my words and actions at such times.
    But there are times when common things must be
    stated, common thoughts must occupy the mind,
    common letters must be written and information
    given that has passed from one to another of the
    workers. Such words, such information, are not
    given under the special inspiration of the Spirit
    of God." (1SM 39 the context of this statement
    is the exact number of rooms in the Paradise
    Valley Sanitarium.)

8
Ellen Whites writings
  • In this statement Ellen White made a distinction
    between the sacred and the common, between that
    which is directly inspired by the Holy Spirit and
    that which is of common origin. Evidently not
    every word written or spoken by her on every
    occasion, was received by revelation.

9
Yet, there are dangers
  • 1. How are we to safely and certainly
    distinguish between sacred and common
    writings?
  • 2. If we should erroneously categorize some
    inspired material as uninspired, would we not
    thus reject Gods counsel for us, fail to profit
    by it, and fail to fulfill His purpose in giving
    it?

10
Yet, there are dangers
  • 3. Even to suggest that some part of her
    writings might be uninspired or non-authoritative
    opens the possibility that one might apply the
    same judgment to any of the writings.

11
Yet, there are dangers
  • 4. Who is to decide what is inspired and what is
    not? There is the real danger that each
    individual would become the self-arbiter of what
    is inspired.
  • 5. If this were to happen then Gods purpose
    through the Spirit of prophecy to rebuke,
    correct, and instruct persons precisely in areas
    where they are not aware of any need, in areas
    that go contrary to their personal views,
    beliefs, understanding of Scripture, and personal
    preferences, would lose its power.

12
Yet, there are dangers
  • "What reserve power has the Lord with which to
    reach those who have cast aside His warnings and
    reproofs, and have accredited the testimonies of
    the Spirit of God to no higher source than human
    wisdom? In the judgment, what can you who have
    done this, offer to God as an excuse for turning
    from the evidences He has given you that God was
    in the work?" (3SM 70 TM466)

13
Basic principle
  • The question of sacred versus common is to be
    settled, not by external criteria or analysis,
    but by the internal testimony of the writings
    themselves.

14
Biblical parallels
  • 1 Cor 114-16 -- "I am thankful that I did not
    baptize any of you except Crispus and Gaius, so
    no one can say that you were baptized into my
    name. (Yes, I also baptized the household of
    Stephanas beyond that, I don't remember if I
    baptized anyone else.)"

15
Biblical parallels
  • 2 Tim 49-13, 19-21 -- "Do your best to come to
    me quickly, for Demas, because he loved this
    world, has deserted me and has gone to
    Thessalonica. Crescens has gone to Galatia, and
    Titus to Dalmatia. Only Luke is with me. Get Mark
    and bring him with you, because he is helpful to
    me in my ministry. I sent Tychicus to
    Ephesus. When you come, bring the cloak that I
    left with Carpus at Troas, and my scrolls,
    especially the parchments. . . . Greet Priscilla
    and Aquila and the household of
    Onesiphorus. Erastus stayed in Corinth, and I
    left Trophimus sick in Miletus. Do your best to
    get here before winter. Eubulus greets you, and
    so do Pudens, Linus, Claudia and all the
    brothers."

16
Ellen White's understanding of her writings
  • Testimonies
  • "Those who carefully read the testimonies as
    they have appeared from the early days, need not
    be perplexed as to their origin. The many books,
    written by the help of the Spirit of God, bear a
    living witness to the character of the
    testimonies." (Letter 225, 1906 in 1SM 49)

17
Ellen White's understanding of her writings
  • Conflict of the Ages Books
  • "Sister White is not the originator of these
    books. They contain the instruction that during
    her lifework God has been giving her. They
    contain the precious, comforting light that God
    has graciously given His servant to be given to
    the world." (CM 125)

18
Ellen White's understanding of her writings
  • Articles
  • "I do not write one article in the paper
    expressing merely my own ideas. They are what God
    has opened before me in vision--the precious rays
    of light shining from the throne." (5T 67)

19
Ellen White's understanding of her writings
  • Letters (testimonies)
  • Weak and trembling, I arose at three o'clock in
    the morning to write to you. God was speaking
    through clay. You may say that this communication
    was only a letter. Yes, it was a letter, but
    prompted by the Spirit of God, to bring before
    your minds things that had been shown me. In
    these letters which I write, in the testimonies I
    bear, I am presenting to you that which the Lord
    has presented to me. (5T 67)

20
Distinguishing the sacred and the common
  • Ellen White wrote documents that were intended to
    be personal communications to family members and
    friends, in which she spoke of common matters in
    ways similar to what Paul wrote in his letters.
    (See Appendix A)
  • How are we to relate to the different categories
    of content in the writings of Ellen White?

21
God vs. Sister White
  • "You have talked over matters as you viewed them,
    that the communications from Sister White are not
    all from the Lord, but a portion is her own mind,
    her own judgment, which is no better than anybody
    else's judgment and ideas. This is one of Satan's
    hooks to hang your doubts upon to deceive your
    soul and the souls of others who will dare to
    draw the line in this matter and say, this
    portion which pleases me is from God, but that
    portion which points out and condemns my course
    of conduct is from Sister White alone, and bears
    not the holy signet. You have in this way
    virtually rejected the whole of the messages,
    which God in His tender, pitying love has sent to
    you to save you from moral ruin. . . ." (To J. D.
    Rice, Letter 16, 1888 in 3SM 68-69)

22
Revelation vs. Opinion
  • "In the testimonies sent to Battle Creek, I have
    given you the light God has given to me. In no
    case have I given my own judgment or opinion. I
    have enough to write of what has been shown me,
    without falling back on my own opinions. You are
    doing as the children of Israel did again and
    again. Instead of repenting before God, you
    reject His words, and attribute all the warnings
    and reproof to the messenger whom the Lord
    sends." (3SM 70)

23
Divine vs. Human
  • "I have my work to do, to meet the misconceptions
    of those who suppose themselves able to say what
    is testimony from God and what is human
    production. If those who have done this work
    continue in this course, satanic agencies will
    choose for them. . . ." (3SM 70)

24
Inspired vs. Uninspired
  • "Those who have helped souls to feel at liberty
    to specify what is of God in the Testimonies and
    what are the uninspired words of Sister White,
    will find that they were helping the devil in his
    work of deception. Please read Testimony No. 33,
    page 211 Testimonies, vol. 5, p. 682, 'How to
    Receive Reproof.' " (Letter 28, 1906 in 3SM 70)

25
Distinguishing the sacred and the common
  • The only safe basis for understanding the
    distinction is The function and purpose of the
    writings themselves.
  • We should not ask whether a statement is inspired
    or not, whether it is of divine origin or of
    common source, whether it comes from God or from
    the writer.

26
Distinguishing the sacred and the common
  • Instead we should understand what are the purpose
    and function of the statement.
  • The difference between 'sacred' and 'common' is
    not a matter of truth vs. error, but a difference
    in function.

27
Only Safe Course
  • Accept the writings in their entirety as the
    prophet's total testimony, but use the various
    parts according to the purposes for which they
    were given.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com