Title: Net Neutrality: A must in a free society
1Net Neutrality A must in a free society
- Joseph Haynes
- Greg Belle
- Nick Dzierzeski
2Definition of the Internet
- A system connecting networks around the world
using TCP/IP, which stands for Transmission
Control Protocol/Internet Protocol, a set of
standards for transmitting and receiving digital
data. The Internet consists primarily of the
collection of billions of interconnected
computers (Economides 2008).
3How the Internet Works
As you can see, your ISP is what connects your
computer to the internet, which other computers
and servers connect to via their ISP. There are
several ways to connect to the ISP, which include
using a dial-up modem over a phone line, cable,
or satellite.
4Definition of Net Neutrality
- Net Neutrality is a network design paradigm that
argues for broadband network providers to be
completely detached from what information is sent
over their networks.
5This chart shows the worlds Internet
restrictions. Internet black holes mean that data
information is really sucked up in a void meaning
that it is there but it will just keep coming and
coming. A lot of smaller under developed
countries surveillance their Internet like Iran
that blocks twitter feeds because of the recent
Iran elections. Some countries as you can see
have minor or no restrictions on the Internet.
6Our Stance on Net Neutrality
- We, as a group, are for net neutrality, keeping
- the internet the same as it was since its
- inception.
7Table of Contents
- History of the Internet
- History of Net Neutrality
- Seven Reasons Why the Internet should be Neutral
- Politics and Net Neutrality
- Economy and Net Neutrality
- Religion and Net Neutrality
- Philosophy and Net Neutrality
- Culture and Net Neutrality
- Legality and Net Neutrality
- Arguments against Net Neutrality
8History of the Internet
- In 1934 the Communications Act became law. First
attempt to regulate phone lines by FCC. - Vannevar Bush first proposed the basics of
hypertext in 1945. - In 1958, Bell System announced its Data Phone
service using regular phones circuits (Anderberg
2007). - In 1962, DARPA lead the way in developing the
Internet.
9History of Internet Pt. 2
- In 1969, the network known as ARPANET was created
to connect 4 databases owned by universities in
the southwestern U.S. - In 1989, the Internet grew in popularity as its
host amount breaks 100,000. - Hypertext Markup Language (First Version of HTML)
was formally published on June 1993. - In 1994, the Internet grew by 341,634
10History of Internet Pt. 3
- In 2003, the phrase network neutrality was
coined when Law Professor Tim Wu presented a
paper at the Silicon Flatirons conference in
Boulder Colorado. - In 2004, the FCC gained control of the
telecommunication industry, introduced the Four
Freedoms - In 2006, Net Neutrality hit mainstream with the
musician Moby appearing at a Capitol Hill press
conference
11History of Internet Pt. 4
- In 2006, a bill was struck down when the House
voted 269-152 to reject Representative Ed
Markeys net neutrality amendment to the COPE
telecom reform bill, HB 5252. - In 2007, the Internet giant Google finally flexed
its muscles with its hiring of former MCI
lobbyist Rick Whitt. - In 2008, the FCC made a critical decision when it
found by a 3-2 vote Comcast guilty of violating
Internet principles. In September of the same
year, Comcast filed an appeal to the FCCs
actions.
12The Seven Reasons for N.N.
- Economic Recovery and Prosperity
- Free Speech
- Civic Participation
- Marketplace of Ideas
- Social Justice
- Rise of Telecom companies
- Political Opportunity
13Senator Ted Stevens
- Senator Ted Stevens (Chairmen of commerce) which
means he is in charge of commerce over the
internet. He has a limited understanding of the
Internet and Net Neutrality (Stevens 2009). John
Stewart explains the epic failure that is Ted
Stevens - http//www.youtube.com/watch?vgfga4bFIUoc
14Politics Net Neutrality
- Most democrats agree with net neutrality and
republicans disagree with it. Republicans are
telling Obama that net Neutrality laws are
harmful (Karr 2009). Let it be known the net was
neutral since its beginning. The way the internet
is now is the way it always has been. Our stance
is it should stay this way.
15Economic Contributions Against Net Neutrality
These are companies that have shown top
contributions of money to representative
republican Joe Barton of Texas for fighting
against net neutrality. These are the top
companies who help run the Internet.
16Economics
- Net Neutrality is the building block of the
abundance-based economy on the Internet.
Significantly effecting the dollars that we would
have back in our pockets, online publishers
would, under Net Neutrality be able to raise
its cost of publishing back to its former level.
When Net Neutrality ends, the monopoly begins
again. Sites like West Seattle Blog are
profitable because of this reason.
17Economics Continued..
- The nightmare situation of having to pay a
company like Comcast to keep the Blog would
effectively put the blog out of business. As of
now, publishing is essentially free. The only
thing that you need is a monthly internet
service. If the old economics come back to the
forefront, preferential treatment will come from
customers who pay. Only larger news organizations
would be able to afford the cost of ensuring
website in peoples homes (Preston 2009).
18Religion Net Neutrality
- Relating to the economics of Net Neutrality, the
religious aspects of Net Neutrality would be
extremely affected if legislation is not passed. - Under the Bush administration, the religious
right blog and evangelical social networking
lines were withering away. - Without Network Neutrality, leaders of all
religions would have harder times reaching out to
people outside their normal congregation
(Religious 2009).
19Religion Net Neutrality Continued..
- Huge controversy was unleashed when Comcast
blocked the King James Bible. Comcast was also
accused for suppressing Christians in China by
blocking online programs and other organizations
from reaching Chinas people (Jones 2008).
20Philosophy Net Neutrality
- The philosophy of Net Neutrality is broken up
into three course beliefs. - First, Digital technology, if unshackled is a
powerful means for creating an egalitarian
society. - Secondly, the end-to-end design of the Internet
is open to innovation.
Continued on Next Page
21Philosophy Net Neutrality Continued.
- Third, and lastly, market players should not
control the Internet (Cleland 2009). Those who
believe in Network Neutrality generally have a
strong stance on the freedom of speech. The
people on Network Neutrality also want to make it
clear that they do not want to force ISPs to
avoid differentiating themselves. What they
dont want is for them to do it in ways that is
determined out of bounds (Anderson 2009).
22Culture Net Neutrality
- Our culture is a very dynamic one. Throughout
the years it has seen many changes in fact our
culture has drastically changed even in the past
100 years. Although many cultural changes are
brought about by world events, even more changes
are brought by technological innovations, such as
the internet.
23Culture Net Neutrality Continued
- The way our culture communicates has been
changed by the internet. Never before has
instant communication from countries from all
over the world been possible in such a new way.
This opens the issue of Net Neutrality with
countries who wish to censor or silence their
populace.
24Culture Net Neutrality Continued
- One recent example that immediately comes to
mind was the debated Iranian election. Public
outrage ensued when Mahmoud Ahmadi Nejad was
re-elected in what seemed to be a rigged vote.
The public of Iran rushed to the Internet posting
pictures and videos from their phones from the
protests. This was regarded as one of the first
time a major protest was displayed in such a way.
Thousands of people in Iran posted up to the
minute updates on their Twitter pages,
detailing police brutalities among other things.
This is where net neutrality comes in, as the
government started shutting down access to the
Internet to quiet the public.
25Legal Issues
- Who has the right to hold the reigns to the
Internet? Do the telecommunication companies own
the Internet? - The answer is no. Telecommunication companies
are merely a means to an end. In other words,
they are merely the gateway to the Internet they
dont own the Internet themselves. - Telecommunication companies should be concerned
with providing the best product to their
customers rather than limiting their output. If
they decide to change the current system,
assuredly the people would not stand for it,
nobody wants a regulated Internet (Press 2006).
26Legal Issues Continued
- For fair market competition, internet service
providers should be able to facilitate a similar
experience for a similar price across the board,
otherwise connecting to the internet will become
a monopoly scheme directed towards the highest
bidding telecommunication company that provides
the best plan.
27Arguments Against Net Neutrality
- Argument
- Net Neutrality would keep broadband access
providers from offering more than one service - Rebuttal
- With Net Neutrality, you are offered a choice.
If the internet was not neutral you would be
forced to utilize certain products dictated by
the service provider, to illustrate this
metaphorically, this would be like being forced
to use Pepsi or Coke depending on the restaurants
(internet service provider) you are utilizing. - But the difference between Internet service
providers restaurants is that you have the
freedom to go to a different restaurant or store
to obtain your preferred soda. If where you live
determines what service provider you use, or if
the government of your country is running the
internet, there is no where for you to turn to
get the products or services you desire
(websites, etc.)
28Arguments Against Net Neutrality Continued
- ATT claims that 5 of its users use over 50 of
the bandwidth. Sandvine reports that over 44 of
its Internet traffic comes from file sharing.
While these numbers may sound drastic, they still
do not justify discrimination on the Internet.
Claiming the fears of people to be irrational,
those who oppose Network Neutrality do not look
at the possible scenarios of a broadband future
(Davis 2009).
29Concluding Statements
- In conclusion, the Internet should be a neutral
place for all of its users. Not all cars are
created are the same, but all should be allowed
on the highway. The same is true with Internet
traffic. File sharing and increased usage, as
well as profits are all issues to the Internet
corporations. What this is about, though, is the
consumer. Its the consumer that the corporations
should cater too, and its the consumer that
counts.
30This Presentation was brought to you by.
31Works Cited
- 1. Anderberg, Anthony (2007). History of the
Internet and Web. Retrieved 10/10/09
from http//www.anderbergfamily.net/ant/history/ -
- 2. Anderson, Nate (2009) Network Neutrality or
Network Neutering. Retrieved from
http//arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/09/ed
itorial-network-neutrality-or-network-neutering.ar
s -
- 3. Cicconi, Jim (2008) Net Neutrality A
Historical Timeline Sidecut Reports. Retrieved
10/10/09 from http//www.sidecutreports.com/2008/1
1/16/net neutrality-a-historical-timeline/ -
- Cleland, Scott (2009) Neutralism Identifying the
Commons Ideology behind Net Neutrality. Received
from http//docs.google.com/gview?avqcache3AAG
iK2dDJVsgJ3Awww.n tcompetition.org2FNeutralism_t
he_ideology_behind_net_neutrality.pdfm aningbehi
ndnetneutralityhlenglussigAFQjCNHiOFb4JPbU
Km2I VuRBAxWqgMncApli1 - 5. Davis, Christopher (2009) Net Neutrality
Good for a few, Bad for most. Retrieved from
http//wistechnology.com/articles/6649/ -
- 6. Economides, Nicholas (2008). "Net
Neutrality", Non-Discrimination and
Digita Distribution of Content Through the
Internet . Retrieved 10/10/09, from
aei brookings.org -
- 7. Howe, Walt (2009). A Brief History of the
Internet. Retrieved 10/10/09. From http//www.walt
howe.com/navnet/history.html -
32Works Cited
- 8. Jones, Lawrence (2008) Christian Coalition
Backs New Neutrality at FCC Hearing. Retrieved
from http//www.christianpost.com/article/20080420
/christian-coalition-backs net-neutrality-at-fcc-h
earing/index.html -
- 9. Karr, Tim (2009) Seven Reasons Why We Need
Net Neutrality Now. Retrieved 10/12/09 from
http//www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/seven-r
easons-why we-need_b_250175.html -
- 10. Kristula, Dave (2001) The History of the
Internet. Retrieved 10/10/09 from http//www.daves
ite.com/webstation/net-history.shtml -
- 11. Lakely, James (2009) The Strange Philosophy
Behind the Movement for Net Neutrality.
Retrieved from http//www.heartland.org/publicatio
ns/policy20studies/article/26061/ -
- 12. Preston, Jason (2009) Why the Future of New
Brands Hinges on Net Neutrality.Retrieved from
http//eatsleeppublish.com/why-thefuture of-
news-brands-hinges-on-net-neutrality/ -
- 13. Singel, Ryan, September 21, 2009 GOP
Senators Move to Stop Obama Net Neutrality Rules
http//www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/09/republican
net-neutratlity-amendment/ -
-
- 14. (2009) Religious Connections. Retrieved
From http//www.baptistplanet.com/2009/09/net
-neutrality-and-religion.html -
- 15. March 17, 2009, www.Youtube.com, Ted Stevens
Tubes http//www.youtube.com/watch?vgfga4bFIUoc -
- 16. United Press (2006) Experts speak out
against Network Neutrality. Retrieved from
http//www.physorg.com/news70725523.html
33Charts and Graphs
34- This graph explains the different bit rates
experienced by countries with different laws on
net neutrality. Japan, as you can see puts their
top priority on the speed of their internet.
35(No Transcript)
36- This graph shows the growing interest of those
seeking the topic choice of net neutrality. The
increased awareness caused by celebrities such as
Moby have brought it to the forefront. Now, it is
the subject of much debate.
37(No Transcript)
38- As stated previously, the video downloading
amount has largely increased with the increase in
bandwidth. This graph illustrates the growing
demands of the internet and the pressures of
companies such as Comcast and ATT to limit
bandwidth usage.
39(No Transcript)
40- Once again, the failure of the United States to
keep a competent, high speed internet is
realized. Net Neutrality along with a better
broadband infrastructure will help the US compete
in the global Internet race.
41(No Transcript)
42- Effectively showing why those who oppose Net
Neutrality are misinformed, daily internet
traffic by 95 of internet users falls in the
middle of the graph while the remaining few fall
below or above in the heavy users area in the top
right corner. This shows there is no reason to
limit bandwidth. Instead, the United States
should build a faster internet that keeps up with
the countries demands.
43(No Transcript)
44- This Verizon ad shows the works of those who seek
to limit the amount of internet usage. With the
less expensive plan, a small amount of
downloadable information is aloud while the more
expensive plan offers more but a still limited
download plan.
45(No Transcript)
46- To clear up rumors, this graph breaks down
internet usage with the use of a pie chart. The
information shows that while fire sharing carries
29 of the usage, this is not a reason to allow
companies to sabotage our internet rights.