Title: Changing Family Structure and Its Implications for Social Inequality in a "Strong" Family Country: Single Parents and Their Children in South Korea
1Changing Family Structure and Its Implications
for Social Inequality in a "Strong" Family
Country Single Parents and Their Children in
South Korea
- Hyunjoon Park
- Sociology, University of Pennsylvania
- Jaesung Choi
- Economics, University of Pennsylvania
2Family Contexts in Korea
- Changing family structure
- Increasing international marriage (between a
Korean man and a foreign woman) - Declining fertility
- Rising divorce
- Weak welfare state limited public support to
families - Implications of changing family structure for
social inequality given the weak welfare state
3Demography of Divorce
- Trends in divorce
- Socioeconomic and demographic determinants of
divorce - Living arrangements of divorced parents and their
children - Consequences of growing up with a divorced parent
for childrens education and well-being - Grandparents and children of divorced parents
4Rising Divorce
5Park Raymo (2010)
6Comparative Level of Divorce
Park Raymo (2010) cf. Andersson Philipov
(2001)
7Educational Differentials in the Risk of Divorce
Park Raymo (2010)
8Weak Welfare State Social Spending on Family in
Cash, Services and Tax Measures, in percentage of
GDP, in 2001
9Implications of Rising Divorce for Social
Inequality
- Growing divorce, especially among the low
educated - Weak welfare state that provides only very
limited public support to (single-parent)
families - Limited economic opportunity for Korean women
- Disparities in economic and social resources
available for children from two-parent and
single-parent families - Growing potential of family structure as a
mechanism of intergenerational transmission of
advantage
10But,,, We Have Strong Family Ties!!
- Family as an essential safety net for vulnerable
members - Reher (1988) priority of families over public
institutions to help vulnerable family members in
Southern European countries - Strong family ties in Asia
- strong families in Southern European societies as
lying between weak families in northern Europe
and North America and much stronger families in
Asia (Reher 1998) - A study of grandparent co-residence and its
impact on parent-child interaction in Japan
(Raymo, Park, and Iwasawa 2010) - But, is family still strong in contemporary Asia?
11Our Research Questions
- Consequences of growing up with a single parent
for childrens education in Korea - Distinguishing single-mother and single-father
families - Data do not allow distinguishing widowhood and
divorce - To what extent do children of single parents live
with their grandparents? - If coresidence can be considered as an indicator
of family ties - Does co-residence with grandparents moderate
negative relationship between single parenthood
and childrens education?
12Data and Variables
- Program for International Student Assessment
(PISA) 2009 - From the international dataset of more than 60
countries, data for Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the
US are extracted - Target population 15-year-old students
- Sample size about 5,000 for Korea, Japan,
Taiwan, and US - Educational outcomes standardized reading, math,
and science test scores - Five plausible values for each test
- Approximately mean 500 points, standard
deviation 100 points among all OECD countries
13Key Variables
- Current living arrangements of children 6 groups
- Two parents living with grandparents without
grandparents - Single mothers living with grandparents without
grandparents - Single fathers living with grandparents without
grandparents - Socioeconomic background of students
- Parental education
- Number of books at home
- Cultural possessions
- Home educational resources
14Methods
- Regression analysis of reading (math and science,
separately) scores predicted by - Model 1 (gross effect) living arrangements only
- Model 2 (net effect) Model 1 Family SES
15Living Arrangements of 15-Year-Old Students
16 Students living with grandparents
17Gross Differences from Two Parents_NO_GP in
Reading Scores
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
USA
KOREA
18Differences from Two Parents_NO_GP in Reading
Scores
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
KOREA
USA
19Gross Differences from Two Parents_NO_GP in
Reading Scores
Two-Parents GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
Taiwan
Japan
20Differences from Two Parents_NO_GP in Reading
Scores
Two-Parents GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
S-Mother NO_GP
S-Mother GP
S-Father NO_GP
S-Father GP
Two-Parents GP
Taiwan
Japan
21Major Findings
- Relatively smaller gaps in test scores by family
structure in Korea (Taiwan and Japan as well)
than in the US, once family SES is taken into
account - However, gross disadvantages associated with
single fatherhood are substantial in Korea
(Taiwan and Japan) - Not strong evidence of differences between
single-parent families with grandparents and
without grandparents in Korea (and US) - Some evidence of benefits of living with
grandparents particularly among single-father
families in Taiwan and Japan
22Issues
- The considerably low level of coresidence with
their parents among Korean single mothers (whose
child is 15-year old) - What do family ties mean to single mothers?
- Do they receive other kinds of support from their
parents even if not living together? - Do single mothers prefer less direct
relationships with their parents? - How do we analyze the effect of grandparents on
childrens education? - Selection
- Measurement of coresidence (duration)
- Longitudinal information on living arrangements
and childrens educational outcomes