Research Methods - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Methods

Description:

Psychology 117 Research Questions Does playing violent videogames produce aggression in children? What are the long-term effects of early malnutrition? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Lycoming
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Methods


1
Research Methods
  • Psychology 117

2
Research Questions
  • Does playing violent videogames produce
    aggression in children?
  • What are the long-term effects of early
    malnutrition?
  • How do children of different ages react to a
    divorce of their parents?

3
Origins of Assumptions and Beliefs?
  • Word-of-Mouth Folklore
  • Friends and relatives
  • Portrayals of children/families on TV/books
  • Religious teachings
  • Talk shows
  • Personal Experiences
  • Expert Opinions
  • Research Evidence

4
Research evidence is valuable because results are
  • Observations of many children
  • Unbiased observers
  • Reliable, valid methods of measurement
  • Careful control

5
Theories
  • An orderly, integrated set of statements that
    describes, explains, and predicts behavior
  • Vital tools
  • Guide and give meaning
  • Practical action

6
  • Theories ? hypotheses
  • Predictions about behavior
  • Research Question vs. Hypothesis
  • Need plan (research design) for conducting
    specific activities (research method)

7
  • Examine whether a relationship exists between
    variables
  • Independent Variable
  • Dependent Variable
  • Does eating candy produce hyperactivity?
  • Does playing violent videogames produce
    aggression in children?
  • Does drinking wine lower your risk for heart
    disease?
  • Does exposure to smoke increase the risk of SIDS?

8
  • Statistical Significance
  • Reliability consistency
  • Validity
  • External/ecological validity
  • Internal validity

9
Correlational Research
  • The Correlational Design
  • 2 or more variables meaningfully related
  • Correlation coefficient (r)
  • 1.00 to -1.00
  • Sign indicates direction
  • Positive ()
  • Negative (-)

10
  • Figure 1.2 Plot of a hypothetical positive
    correlation between the amount of violence that
    children see on television and the number of
    aggressive responses they display. Each dot
    represents a specific child who views a
    particular level of televised violence (shown on
    the horizontal axis) and commits a particular
    number of aggressive acts (shown on the vertical
    axis). Although the correlation is less than
    perfect, we see that the more acts of violence a
    child watches on TV, the more inclined he or she
    is to behave aggressively toward peers.

11
Correlational Research
  • Correlational studies ? causation.
  • Causal direction unknown
  • Could be due to a third, unmeasured (confounding)
    variable

12
Experimental Design
  • Cause/effect
  • Systematically manipulate a variable
  • Random assignment
  • Control group
  • Experimental/treatment group(s)
  • Hold conditions constant
  • Eliminate threat of confounding variables

13
Field Experiment
  • Natural setting
  • Example in text Belgian delinquents living in
    minimum-security institution for adolescent boys

14
  • Figure 1.3 Mean physical aggression scores in the
    evening for highly aggressive (HA) and less
    aggressive (LA) boys under baseline conditions
    and after watching violent or neutral movies.
    ADAPTED FROM LEVENS ET AL., 1975.

15
Field Experiment
  • May not be aware that they are participating

16
  • Study the effects of malnutrition or sensory
    deprivation on infant motor development.
  • Volunteers?

17
Natural/Quasi-Experiment
  • Naturally occurring events
  • No manipulation of variables
  • No random assignment

18
  • Table 1.4 Strengths and Limitations of General
    Research Designs

19
Self-Report Methodologies
  • Interviews/Questionnaires
  • Unstructured to structured
  • Difficult with children
  • Clinical Method
  • Can ask follow-up questions specific to
    individual being interviewed (thus, less
    structured)

20
Self-Report Methodologies
  • Limitations
  • Honesty/accuracy
  • Interpretation of questions
  • Use with children
  • Strengths
  • Efficient (large amounts of data, short amount of
    time)
  • Confidentiality improves accuracy

21
Observational Methodologies
  • Naturalistic Observation
  • Observations in common, everyday (i.e., natural)
    settings
  • Strengths easy, behavior is natural
  • Thus _________ validity is high
  • Limitations frequency of behavior reactivity

22
Observational Methodologies
  • Structured Observations
  • Laboratory setting
  • Set up a scenario
  • Strengths same environment, attempt to elicit
    low frequency behaviors
  • Limitations external validity?

23
Case Study
  • a detailed portrait of a single individual can
    also describe groups
  • Strength depth
  • Limitations
  • Difficult to compare
  • Generalizability
  • Observer bias

24
Ethnography
  • Collect data by living within the cultural
    community for an extended period
  • Strengths understanding cultural conflicts and
    impacts on development
  • Limitations subjective, may not be generalizable

25
Psychophysiological Methods
  • Examine relationship between physiological
    responses and behavior
  • Heart Rate compared to baseline, decrease may
    indicate interest
  • EEG brain wave activity, showing arousal
    states stimulus detection
  • Strengths
  • Can examine behaviors in infants/young children
    before they can self-report

26
Psychophysiological Methods
  • Limitations?
  • High degree of inference
  • Change in physiology due to stimuli?

27
  • Table 1.3 Strengths and Limitations of Seven
    Common Research Methods

28
Designs for Studying Development
  • Longitudinal Design
  • Same participants over time
  • Can assess stability
  • Can identify trends
  • Can help understand individual differences

29
Designs for Studying Development
  • Longitudinal Design (cont)
  • Limitations
  • Costly and time-consuming
  • Selective attrition
  • Practice effects
  • Cohort effects

30
Designs for Studying Development
  • Cross-sectional Design
  • Groups of people of differing ages (although
    sometimes the same age) studied at one point in
    time
  • Strengths?
  • Efficient (time money), no practice effects or
    attrition
  • Limitations?
  • Information on individual change is not available
  • Confound age and cohort effects

31
  • Figure 1.5 Example of a sequential design. Two
    samples of children, one born in 1998, and one
    born in 2000 are observed longitudinally between
    the ages of 6 and 12. The design permits the
    investigator to assess cohort effects by
    comparing children of the same age who were born
    in different years. In the absence of cohort
    effects, the longitudinal and cross-sectional
    comparisons in this design also permit the
    researcher to make strong statements about the
    strength and the direction of any developmental
    changes.

32
Designs for Studying Development
  • Microgenetic Design
  • Illuminate processes that promote developmental
    change
  • Repeatedly expose children ready for a
    developmental change to experiences thought to
    produce that change
  • Monitor behavior as it changes

33
Designs for Studying Development
  • Microgenetic Design (cont)
  • Strengths
  • Able to see the process of change
  • Limitations
  • Time consuming
  • Repeated observations

34
Table 1.5 Strengths and Limitations of Four
Developmental Designs
35
  • A researcher is interested in whether there is a
    relationship between the sporting events in which
    siblings choose to engage. This researcher sent
    a survey to 500 different families and asked
    parents to write down the age of each child and
    to list in which sports each child participated.
    The researcher collected all of the surveys and
    examined whether there was a relationship between
    siblings choice of sports.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

36
  • A researcher is interested in whether drinking
    water right before bed increases the likelihood
    that children will wet the bed at night. The
    researcher recruits 50 5-year-old children to
    participate in her study. Twenty-five children
    are given two glasses of water two hours before
    their bedtime (one glass per hour) and
    twenty-five children are prohibited from
    receiving liquids within two hours of their
    bedtime. The researcher collects information
    from the parents of the children participating
    for one week parents are telephoned and asked
    to report whether the child wet the bed each
    night.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

37
  • A researcher was interested in how children learn
    how to settle disagreements with peers. The
    researcher talked to his 5-year-old daughter and
    asked her to describe how she interacted with her
    peers. The researcher then read a few stories to
    his daughter about children her age who got into
    disagreements and asked her what she would do in
    that situation. The researcher continued to
    interview his daughter like this for five years.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

38
  • A researcher was interested in whether the
    construct of helplessness (e.g., low persistence,
    negative affect, negative self-evaluations) is
    similar in toddlers, preschoolers, and older
    children. The researcher recruited a group of
    2-year-olds and a group of 4-year-olds and
    brought them into a playroom setting. The
    children were videotaped playing with impossible
    puzzles and helpless behaviors were measured.
    The children were brought back two years later
    (the first group of children was then 4 and the
    second group was 6) and were given another set of
    impossible puzzles. Helpless behaviors were
    again measured.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

39
  • A researcher is interested in whether boys or
    girls are more aggressive when playing with
    peers. The researcher goes to a playground every
    day for 5 weeks and watches children playing with
    one another. The researcher records every
    instance of aggression that he witnesses.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

40
  • A researcher is interested in whether a mothers
    diet during pregnancy influences her babys
    cognitive ability. The researcher finds a group
    of women who were malnourished during pregnancy
    and tests their infants cognitive skills and
    finds another group of women who were not
    malnourished during pregnancy and gives the same
    test to their infants. The researcher then gives
    all of the children an IQ test when they reach
    the age of 6.
  • Correlational or Experimental?
  • Method?
  • Observation, interview/questionnaire, clinical
    method, case study, ethnography,
    psychophysiological
  • Cross-sectional, longitudinal, or sequential?
  • IV and DV?

41
Ethical Considerations
  • Research Ethics standards of conduct to protect
    participants from harm
  • Protection from harm
  • Benefits to risks ratio
  • Informed consent
  • Confidentiality
  • Deception/Debriefing/Knowledge of Results
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com