ECO/HCM 504 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

ECO/HCM 504

Description:

Lecture Notes Physician Services Market Why do we have physician firms? (and what do they do?) dual role of physician firms the physician as an input into the ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: ReedO3
Category:
Tags: eco | hcm | physicians

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ECO/HCM 504


1
ECO/HCM 504 Health Care Economics
  • Lecture Notes Physician Services Market

2
Why do we have physician firms? (and what do
they do?)
  • dual role of physician firms
  • the physician as an input into the production of
    physician services
  • Demand for physician services is a derived
    demand.
  • Affected by Economic factors
  • Prices, Income, insurance coverage, prices of
    competing goods
  • Affected by Non-economic factors
  • Age, Illness events, education, marriage, etc.
  • the physician as owner and entrepreneur
  • Supply of Physician Services is derived from
    other end of market (input markets) such as
  • Physician Labor, nurses labor, technical
    assistants, etc.
  • Capital and equipment

3
  • the physician services firm vs. the market
  • vertical and horizontal integration (what's
    that?)
  • What is the alternative? Compare internal
    (integration) vs. external (market) systems.
  • Health care has moved away from the market toward
    internal system with government regulation.
  • possible goals of the physician firm
  • profit
  • leisure (of who?)
  • patient's health
  • What are the relationships?
  • important issues to be addressed
  • demand side or allocative efficiency
  • supply side or technological efficiency
  • public policy implications

4
Demand Side Performance
  • Overriding issue is allocative efficiency but
    difficult to measure either benefits or costs gt
    How to assess allocative efficiency?
  • variations in physicians' fees between
    areas/physicians
  • how should fees vary in a perfectly competitive
    market?
  • if patients have incomplete information and must
    search?
  • if quality differences exist between physicians?
  • empirical predictions
  • Consider 2 different goods standardized
    glaucoma test vs. surgery for, say, prostate
    cancer Which would have the largest variation
    in fees even when the market is competitive (but
    with asymmetric information)?
  • Glaucoma test why? Doesnt pay to search for
    the best deal for small budget item.

5
  • is the market for physicians' services
    competitive? empirical results
  • Conclusions ? Get large variation even for
    large budget items gt
  • Evidence that the market is not competitive.

6
  • increases in physicians' fees over time
  • what should happen to fees in both short and
    long-run if the market is competitive?
  • Short-run competitive firms can make profits gt
    prices and costs may vary independently.
  • Long-run competitive firms can not make profits
    gt prices can only vary as costs vary.
  • do fee increases over time reflect increased
    costs?
  • Examine handout to answer question especially
    look at differences over time in how fees change
    compared to costs as measured by overall CPI.
  • Conclusions
  • Evidence of lack of competition in market
  • More evidence of competition in recent past

7
Supply Side Performance
  • the production of physician services
  • how do you measure output
  • physician visits? - advantages and disadvantages
  • annual gross billings? - advantages and
    disadvantages
  • what are the inputs in the production process?
  • must be at least 1 physician (why?)
  • other inputs? Nurses, technicians, etc.
  • relationship between the inputs? Substitutes vs.
    complements?

8
  • technological efficiency
  • empirical studies of the use of aides by
    physicians
  • Increases in price increase the optimal of
    aides
  • Increases in wages decrease the optimal of
    aides
  • Confirmation of economic theory on optimal use of
    inputs
  • However, aides also found to be underutilized gt
    inefficient (see T 15.1 p. 239). What other
    inputs are underutilized?
  • MP/w should be equal if inputs are correctly
    utilized
  • If MP/w larger for a given input gt that input is
    underutilized and the reverse.
  • Why are too few aides and other inputs used?
  • Attempt by Dr. to give best possible care (Dr.s
    care) to patient?
  • How to use a monopolized input (Drs) to maximize
    profit?

9
  • group practice studies
  • Group practices produce more at lower costs gt
    efficient.
  • Recent increases in the use of group practice
    suggests efficiency as well
  • Economies of scale exist and explain increasing
    size of physician firms.
  • Incentive Problems in groups
  • Shared profit leads to incentives to shirk. Why?
  • As group size increase then incentives to shirk
    increases.
  • If paid flat wage the incentive then still have
    incentive to shirk. Why?
  • How does the firm monitor worker effort?
  • referrals among physicians (why is this a
    concern?)
  • fee splitting
  • multi-specialty firms
  • Conclusion increases in competition are forcing
    drs to take advantage of aides, economies of
    scale, etc. gt the market is non-competitive but
    the level of competition is increasing.

10
Models of Physician Pricing
  • monopoly pricing model (collusive joint profit
    maximization model)
  • the importance of entry barriers
  • cheating on the cartel
  • what happens, according to the model, when
    insurance coverage increases?
  • Demand increases and becomes less elastic.
  • Both cause price to increase. This prediction is
    supported by empirical evidence.
  • why limit advertising by physicians?

11
  • Supplier induced demand
  • Two conditions lead to SID
  • Assymetric Information
  • Dr. as agent
  • Based on empirical observation of correlation
    between things like
  • Hospital beds and hospital utilization
  • Drs and utilization of Drs services
  • Two possible interpreations using D/S analysis

12
P
QS increases
Drs income falls
P and Q rise
P and Q rise
13
  • Target income model
  • The first graph is this model
  • Notice that the second graph is simplier and
    evidence suggests it is more likely to explain
    the empirical observation.
  • Price rigidities
  • Difficult to change price quickly (why?)
  • As input prices rise gt prices rise slower
  • Leads to inducement but only enough to decrease
    the surplus
  • Disapears over time
  • Disutility of discretion model
  • Problem with SID why are drs satisfied with a
    given target why not higher?
  • Assume U U(Y, W, D)
  • YDrs income, impact W Drs hours of work, -
    impact
  • DDisutility caused by inducing demand, - impact
  • Inducement causes tradeoff between extra income
    and more work and disutility from inducement.
  • Therefore, a limit to inducement because of
    tradeoff

14
  • Profit maximization
  • SID has another potential tradeoff
  • Increasing D increase profit but also increases
    costs (diminishing returns).
  • Tradeoff between the two leads to some limit to
    SID
  • Problems ? identification
  • Causality See figures above
  • Graph 1 says increase in S causes increase in D
  • Graph 2 says increase in D causes increase in Qs
  • Causality asks which comes first
  • Empirical Evidence on SID
  • Some evidence in favor of SID from price rigidity
    studies
  • Is there evidence of SID caused by imperfect
    information and agency?
  • Compare initial visits to Drs (patient initiated)
    vs followup visits (Dr. Initiated) gt find
    evidence of SID from differential impact of D.
  • Some evidence exists of SID although not large
    impact

15
  • Small Area Variation
  • Figure 10.5 p. 216
  • Shows variation in utilization between geographic
    areas. Why?
  • Differences in level of competition
  • Differences in information/practice styles of
    Drs.
  • Figure 10.6 shows these differences which lead to
    different practice styles.
  • How to test the model? How do we measure
    practice style?
  • Studies show that education/feedback/surveillance
    of Drs changes practice style.
  • Comparison of relatively homogenous areas still
    finds SAV.
  • Multiple regression studies controlling for other
    factors still find SAV (although smaller).

16
  • Public Policy
  • conclusions about the level of competition in the
    physician services market
  • Market is not competitive.
  • The level of competition is increasing.
  • possible public policy proposals to increase
    competition
  • Regulation
  • The source of much of the inefficiency in the
    market is regulation (e.g., licensing laws lead
    to non-optimal use of labor in health care
    markets) gt reduce regulation?
  • Problems
  • Medicare payment reform
  • Others?

17
  • The Physician as Labor
  • why become a doctor? (what matters when making
    the decision?)
  • the cost of becoming a doctor
  • the benefits of becoming a doctor
  • graphical

Earnings MD
Earnings BA/BS
0
Graduate with BA/BS
Graduate with MD
18
C
B
A
  • Area A Direct costs of MD
  • Area B Indirect costs of MD
  • Area C Benefit of MD
  • Invest if C gt A B not quite, also add
    discount rates
  • Empirical Results see handout on rates of
    return for MD education
  • empirical rates of return

19
  • Why specialize?
  • the cost and benefits of specialization
  • empirical rates of return
  • Why have licensing of health care professionals
  • 3 theories
  • Each focuses on a different group benefiting from
    licensing.
  • Public Interest Theory
  • Licensing benefits the public - consumers
  • Capture Theory
  • Licensing benefits the professionals being
    licensed.
  • Political Economy Theory
  • Licensing benefits the regulators gt sell
    licensing to highest bidder, sometimes public and
    sometimes professionals.
  • Empirical Evidence tends to support political
    economy theory
  • See T 15.4 p. 344 licensing varies by state gt
    test the impact of licensing on professional fees
    gt conclude sometimes fees increases but
    sometimes not.
  • Quality if licensing increases quality gt
    supports public interest.
  • Again sometimes find quality increased, sometimes
    decreased gt support for political economy
    theory.

20
  • labor supply of physicians
  • why do physicians supply labor?
  • labor as a consumption good
  • Work because it gives us utility gt implications?
  • labor as an investment good
  • Work because it gives us money gt implications
  • the relationship between labor and leisure
  • Leisure is what you do when youre not working or
    sleeping/eating/etc.
  • Tradeoff between labor and leisure
  • what is the wage rate?
  • Wage rate equals the price paid for labor
  • Wage rate also equals the opportunity cost of
    leisure

21
  • what does an individual's supply of labor look
    like?
  • Two effects of a wage increase
  • Focus on the labor/leisure tradeoff gt when
    leisure ? or ? then labor ? or ?.
  • substitution effect w ? gt consumption of
    leisure ? because leisure is now more costly (?
    opportunity cost of leisure) gt substitute less
    time intensive types of leisure for more time
    intensive types gt ? quantity supplied of labor.
  • income effect w ? gt income rises (? price of
    labor) gt leisure is a normal good gt consumption
    of leisure ? gt ? quantity supplied of
    labor.
  • Both effects occur simultaneously gt which is
    largest?
  • Empirical question examine behavior as wages
    increase
  • Empirical studies of physician labor supply shows
    the following

22
SL
Income Effect outweighs Substitution Effect
W
Theoretical Maximum 16x7
Substitution Effect outweighs Income Effect
112
23
  • Do market labor supply curves also bend
    backwards?
  • Empirical questions and answer no. Why not?
  • New entry as w increases.
  • Fixed components of labor supply
  • One example is malpractice insurance, which
    induces drs not to reduce labor supply as wage
    increases.
  • Physician Location Decisions
  • Hotelling Model
  • Say have a concession stand on a beach
  • Where do you locate? Assume customers evenly
    distributed on beach.
  • Why? Because it reduces travel time and
    maximizes demand and profit.
  • Where does second, third, etc. firm locate?

24
  • Same principle for new entry.
  • Also same principle is true for Drs.
  • Locate where they can have the maximum number of
    customers.
  • Predictions from the model
  • As the number of drs increases gt should see more
    communities with drs.
  • Same is true of specialists.
  • Empirical evidence supports these predictions.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com