EPA MS4 AUDIT Minnesota Experience - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

EPA MS4 AUDIT Minnesota Experience

Description:

EPA MS4 AUDIT Minnesota Experience Frank Pafko Director, Office of Environmental Stewardship MN Department of Transportation * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * One ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: Paula187
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EPA MS4 AUDIT Minnesota Experience


1
EPA MS4 AUDITMinnesota Experience
  • Frank Pafko
  • Director, Office of Environmental Stewardship
  • MN Department of Transportation

2
  • MINNESOTA
  • One General MS4 Permit applies to entire state
  • MnDOT SWPPPs Greater MN and Metro District
  • Metro MS4 was audited 1st DOT in EPA Region V
  • Urbanized portions of 8 Counties
  • Population of 2 Million
  • 40,000 acres of R/W
  • 3950 lane miles of state trunk highway
  • 1200 bridges

3
EPA Audit of Metros MS4 Program
  • Three Fun Filled Days

4
  • 90-Day Notice of Audit

5
  • Questions that EPA Will Ask
  • What are you doing?
  • What guidelines, policy training do you follow?
  • How do you plan/ prepare for what you do?
  • How do you track what you do?

6
Audit Itself
  • 3 from EPA, 4 MPCA and 2 EPA consultants.
  • Spent ½ day going over material in office, ½ day
    in field for 3 days. Lots of extra time after
    they left pulling more materials and prep for
    next day.
  • 2 teams for field review one focused on
    construction the other on maintenance.
  • Full access to our facilities, projects and
    people.

7
  • AUDIT FINDINGS Potential Violations
  1. Outreach strategy lacked specific targets goals
  2. Illicit Discharge procedures incomplete
  3. Storm sewer mapping incomplete
  4. No written procedures site inspection/enforcement
  5. Structural control inspections less than 20 /
    year
  6. Facility Storm Water Plans not up-to-date
  7. Training needed for maintenance personnel

8
  • 1. The Metro district did not include specific
    target audiences and goals as part of its written
    outreach strategy
  • Disagreed with the finding
  • Target audiences, goals outreach strategies
    clearly listed in MS4 SWPPP
  • Pointed out errors in report

9
  • 2. Metro Districts procedures for observing
    outfalls to screen for improper discharges do not
    include a method to rule out suspect flows
  • Disagreed with the finding
  • Developed procedures to fit the needs of the
    permittee, rather than prescriptive, one size
    fits all approach.
  • Pointed out errors in report

10
  • 3. Storm Sewer Mapping Incomplete
  • Disagreed with finding
  • Permit does not define the map, only the data
    points that must be represented
  • Five datasets contain more than required info
  • Moving to comprehensive GIS map (GeoCortex)
  • Pointed out errors in report
  • Ditches flow direction
  • Ultimate receiving water

11
  • 4. Metro District had not developed written
    procedures for site inspection and enforcement of
    control measures
  • Formalized our procedures for construction
    erosion control oversight inspections
  • Pilot project started in August 2011, using
    incentives rather than just penalties
  • Focused training use of withholdings
  • Pointed out errors in report

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
  • 5.Metro District needs to ensure that 20 of all
    structural controls are inspected each year
  • Disagreed with finding
  • Inspection season April November
  • 3 months remain to inspect 87 ponds
  • Added truck station ponds to inventory
  • Tree and brush removal around ponds
  • EPA wanted all removed
  • Undertook selective removal

15
(No Transcript)
16
  • 6. Metro District Facility Storm Water Plans
    (FSWP) are not reflective of current site
    conditions and have not been fully implemented
  • Created Metro Maintenance Stormwater Committee
  • Revised FSWPs
  • Established main contact for each facility
  • Water Resource Engineering involvement in all
    facility upgrades

17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
  • 7. Need for training on pollution prevention and
    FSWP Plans for truck station and fleet
    maintenance staff
  • Corrected deficiency
  • 526 maintenance personnel trained
  • Completed by February 9, 2011

21
  • EPA Acknowledged Positive Attributes
  • MS4 SWPPP covers entire Metro District
  • Dedicated MS4 Metro Construction Engineer
  • Monetary penalty for unresponsive contractors
  • Minnesota Snow Ice Control Field handbook for
    Snow Plow Operators
  • Research into treatment capabilities

22
Conclusions
  • DOCUMENTATION, DOCUMENTATION, DOCUMENTATION
  • How to get people on board?
  • Build relationships.
  • Never enough resources.

23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com