PSY402 Theories of Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

PSY402 Theories of Learning

Description:

PSY402 Theories of Learning Wednesday January 15, 2003 Examples of Conditioning Popcorn at the movies. Fear of flying -- stronger with more turbulence (a stronger UCS). – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: NAlva6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PSY402 Theories of Learning


1
PSY402Theories of Learning
  • Wednesday
  • January 15, 2003

2
Examples of Conditioning
  • Popcorn at the movies.
  • Fear of flying -- stronger with more turbulence
    (a stronger UCS).
  • An antelope shying away from low tree branches.
  • Nausea at the smell of alcohol after a hangover.

3
Conditioning Situations
  • Sign-tracking (autoshaping) animals must
    recognize signs of food (UCS) and respond (UCR).
  • Pigeons pecking at key.
  • UCR, not an operant response, because behavior is
    specific to the stimulus.
  • Eyeblink conditioning
  • UCR is rapid, CR is slow.
  • Many trials are needed (100 pairings)

4
Fear Conditioning
  • Avoidance is not a good measure of fear.
  • Suppression of an operant behavior occurs with a
    feared stimulus.
  • First an operant behavior is learned.
  • Second a CS is paired with an aversive UCS.
  • Third the CS is presented in the operant
    chamber.

5
Suppression Ratio
  • During CS
  • SuppressionRatio During CS Without CS
  • The amount of time during and without the CS is
    equal.
  • The more fear, the lower the suppression ratio.
  • Ratios typically fall between 0 and .5

6
Flavor Aversion Learning
  • Garcia rats will not drink water with saccharin
    if they get ill after drinking.
  • Significant avoidance occurs after just one
    trial.
  • Human food aversions are related to illness
    (89).
  • Even if illness occurs hours later it is linked
    to the previous meal.
  • Not cognitive know food not to blame

7
Conditioning Paradigms
  • Delayed conditioning the CS onset precedes the
    UCS onset.
  • Trace conditioning the CS starts and ends
    before the UCS onset.
  • Simultaneous conditioning the CS and UCS occur
    together.
  • Backward conditioning the UCS starts and ends
    before the CS onset.

8
Temporal Conditioning
  • No CS is presented.
  • The UCS occurs at regular intervals.
  • A CR eventually occurs just before the UCS.
  • Mechanism a biological state typically provides
    the CS.
  • Waking up just before the alarm goes off.

9
Importance of Timing
  • A cue (CS) needs to be a good predictor of the
    UCS.
  • Optimal inter-stimulus-interval (ISI) varies with
    the kind of response.
  • The latency to respond is different for different
    reflexes (saliva, heart rate)
  • Too long or too short intervals result in weaker
    conditioning.
  • Intermediate CSs form a bridge.

10
Importance of CS Strength
  • CS intensity affects CR strength only when the CS
    intensity varies.
  • If the CS strength is always the same, then the
    CS strength doesnt affect the size of the CR.
  • Both dogs must bite in order for their size to
    matter.
  • In order for CS intensity to matter, it must
    signal something.

11
Importance of UCS Strength
  • Strength of the CR increases with strength of the
    UCS.
  • The more intense the air puff, the stronger the
    eyeblink CR.

12
Salience of the CS
  • Salience refers to how noticeable a stimulus is
    how likely an organism is to notice it in the
    environment.
  • Preparedness (evolutionary predisposition) makes
    some CS more salient than others.
  • The more salient the CS, the stronger the CR and
    faster learning.

13
Predictiveness of the CS
  • Predictiveness refers to how reliably the CS is
    associated with the UCS.
  • When two or more CSs are present, only the most
    reliable elicits a CR.
  • When the CS occurs with the UCS more often than
    the UCS occurs alone, conditioning occurs.
  • A CS alone weakens conditioning.

14
Blocking
  • Presence of a previously conditioned CS (existing
    predictive cue) prevents conditioning of a new
    CS.
  • Parent threats presence of fear of the parent
    prevents acquisition of fear to another stimulus.

15
Implications for Parenting
  • Threats (CS) should reliably be accompanied by
    punishment (UCS) or they will be ignored.
  • Timing of threat (CS) and punishment (UCS) should
    be close together not wait until Dad gets home.
  • Fear of parents (CER) may block conditioning of
    any other CS.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com