Role of Patient-Facing Technologies in the Era of Health Reform - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

Role of Patient-Facing Technologies in the Era of Health Reform

Description:

Role of Patient-Facing Technologies in the Era of Health Reform David K. Ahern, PhD Director, Health Information Technology Resource Center (HITRC) for Aligning ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:128
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: DAH8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Role of Patient-Facing Technologies in the Era of Health Reform


1
Role of Patient-Facing Technologies in the Era of
Health Reform
  • David K. Ahern, PhD
  • Director, Health Information Technology Resource
    Center (HITRC) for Aligning Forces for Quality of
    RWJF
  • Director, Program in Behavioral Informatics
    eHealth
  • Department of Psychiatry, Brigham Womens
    Hospital/Harvard Medical School
  • Senior Scientist, Abacus Management Technologies
  • Meaningful Use Conference
  • March 16, 2012

2
Disclosure
  • Co-founder and Principal of Abacus Management
    Technologies LLC
  • The Good Health Gateway is a proprietary web
    portal platform of Abacus Management Technologies
    LLC

3
Overview
  • Patients are using HIT in a variety of ways
  • Meaningful Use (MU) rule provides some initial
    guidance for patient-facing technologies
  • Requires a greater understanding of patients
    wants and needs to determine how these
    technologies can be utilized effectively

4
Patient-Facing Technology?
5
Patient-Facing Technologies in Clinical Care
Theoretical Framework
  • Patient Centered Care Model

Self-Management Support
Decision Support
Patient Navigator
Productive Interactions
6
Am Journal of Prev Med 2011 40(5S2)S162-S172
7
Current Patient Uses of HIT
  • Seek health information for themselves, friends
    and family
  • Access health services appointment scheduling,
    medication refills
  • Communicate with provider via secure messaging
    regarding non-urgent health issues
  • Use Computerized Tailored Interventions (CTIs)

8
Current Patient Uses of HIT (cont.)
  • Use a Personal Health Record (PHR) or patient web
    portal
  • Use remote monitoring devices, wearable and
    passive sensors
  • Seek social support and community engagement via
    social networks and social media

9
Value of Web Portals
10
Web Portals
11
(No Transcript)
12
Value of PHRs
13
(No Transcript)
14
What is Social Media?
  • Tools which harness and capitalize on the robust
    aggregate of information and people online
  • Shifts away from 3rd party media to user
    generated content
  • Individually created and
  • controlled flow of content
  • (e.g., text, video, photos)
  • to others

15
(No Transcript)
16
Mobility andConstant Access as Drivers
  • People who use Facebook on their mobile devices
    are almost 50 more active on Facebook than
    non-mobile users
  • Worldwide mobile traffic from each region has
    increased at least 4x in the last two years, with
    6x increase in North America
  • Having a smart phone increases sharing of all
    kinds.
  • Susannah Fox (2010)

Facebook (2009) Admob.com (2010) Pew Internet
American Life (2010)
17
Patient-FacingInformation and Services
18
Patient-Facing Technologies for Meaningful Use
19
Patient-facing TechnologyeBP Control Program
Principal Investigator Charles Eaton, MD,
MS Co-Principal Investigator David K. Ahern, PhD
20
Problem of Uncontrolled BP
  • 35 of Americans with hypertension optimally
    managed
  • 25 are unaware of their diagnosis
  • These risk identification and treatment gaps are
    greater for non-Hispanic blacks and
    Mexican-Americans

21
(No Transcript)
22
Home BPM Lower than Office
  • On average, home BPs are lower than office BPs by
    5 mm Hg
  • SBP home - 135 office - 140
  • DBP home - 85 office - 90

23
Home BPM Treatment Goals
  • BP goals for average risk
  • SBP lt135 mm Hg or DBP lt85 mm Hg
  • BP goal for high risk (Cardiovascular Disease,
    Chronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes Mellitus)
  • SBP lt125 mm Hg or DBP lt75 mm Hg
  • BP goal for Left Ventricular Dysfunction
  • SBP lt115 mm Hg or DBP lt75 mm Hg

24
Home BPM Device
  • Omron BP monitor,
  • HEM-790IT

25
Patient Navigators
26
Good Health Gateway Entry Screen
27
Good Health Gateway Education
28
Good Health Gateway My Monitoring Page
29
Good Health Gateway Results
30
Good Health Gateway Patient Navigator View
31
Patient Navigator Summary View
32
Centricity eBP Control Form
33
Centricity eBP Follow-Up Form
34
Overcoming Clinical InertiaRed Light
  • HBP gt140/90 for AR
  • HBP gt130/80 for HR
  • HBP gt120/80 for LVD
  • The PN will send a flag to team nurse and PCP,
    schedule an appointment as necessary
  • PCP to escalate treatment - document in chart

35
Overcoming Clinical InertiaAll Lights Flashing
  • HBP gt180/120
  • PN to contact team nurse or
  • PCP for same day visit or ED visit
  • PCP to evaluate for Hypertensive Urgency vs.
    Emergency, and make appropriate triage decision
  • Document in chart

36
Table 1. Demographics of Participants in eBP
Control Program (n28) Mean Age, yrs
(SD) 58.5 (12.0) Sex () Female 16
(57.1) Male 12 (42.9) Ethnicity
() Non-Hispanic White 25 (89.3) Non-Hispa
nic Black 2 (7.1) Non-Hispanic Am. Indian 1
(3.6) Education () Less than HS 2
(7.1) HS graduate 9 (32.1) More than
HS 17 (60.7) Marital Status
() Partnered 18 Not Partnered 9
eBP e-Health Blood Pressure
37
Chronology of systolic BP from research visits
(RV), home monitoring (HM), and visits to primary
care physician (PCP) relative to home goal BP
(135/85) for an average risk patient. Enrollment
began on 9/15/2010 (1). Patient randomized to
gain access to patient navigator (PN), in
addition to web portal, on 1/6/2011 (2). Between
time point (1) and (2), patient had access to
only home monitoring. New medication was
prescribed on 2/14/2011 (3).
38
Chronology of systolic BP from RV, HM, and visits
to PCP related to home goal BP (135/85) for an
average risk patient. Enrollment began on
9/13/2010 (1). Patient randomized to gain access
to only the web portal on 1/5/2011 (2). Between
time point (1) and (2), patient had access to
only home monitoring. Patient introduced to PN
on 4/4/2011 (3). New medications were prescribed
on 4/7/2011 (4). Participant met with hospital
social worker to assist with health insurance
4/25/2011 (5).
39
Conclusions
  • Success of health reform is predicated on
    improved health outcomes and reduced costs,
    achievable only with engaged and activated
    patients
  • Patient-facing technologies are likely to play a
    critical role in supporting informed and
    activated patients
  • Research is needed on comparative effectiveness,
    ways to increase adoption and minimize unintended
    consequences

40
Thank You
  • dahern_at_partners.org
  • (617)525-6167
  • Twitter dahern1
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com