Leapfrog Who, What, Why, Where,When - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Leapfrog Who, What, Why, Where,When

Description:

Leapfrog Who, What, Why, Where,When Gary L. Weinstein M.D. Director of Pulmonary and Critical Care Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas The Leapfrog Group: Who Founded by ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: Tria347
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leapfrog Who, What, Why, Where,When


1
LeapfrogWho, What, Why, Where,When
  • Gary L. Weinstein M.D.
  • Director of Pulmonary and Critical Care
  • Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas

2
The Leapfrog Group Who
  • Founded by The Business Roundtable in 2000
  • Consortium of over 120 Fortune 500 companies and
    other large public and private health care
    purchasers
  • Provide health benefits to over 34 million
    Americans in all 50 states
  • Members and and their employees spend billions on
    health care each year

3
The Leapfrog Group Who
  • Their mission is to trigger a giant LEAP
    forward in quality, customer service and
    affordability of health care by
  • Making the American public aware of a small
    number of highly compelling and easily understood
    advances in patient safety and
  • Specifying a simple set of purchasing principles
    designed to promote these safety advances, as
    well as overall customer value

4
The Leapfrog Group Who
  • Their effort is rooted in four ideas
  • American health care remains far below
    obtainable levels of basic safety and overall
    customer value
  • The health care industry would improve more
    rapidly if purchasers better recognized and
    rewarded superior safety and value

5
The Leapfrog Group Who
  • Voluntary adherence to purchasing principles by a
    critical mass of Americas largest employers
    would provide a large jump-start and encourage
    other purchasers to join
  • These principles should not only champion
    superior overall value but also focus on a
    handful of specific innovations offering great
    leaps in basic patient safety to maximize media
    and consumer support and adoption by other
    purchasers.

6
The Leapfrog Group What
  • Initial Leaps in Patient Safety
  • Computer Physician Order Entry (CPOE)
  • Shown to reduce errors in hospitals by more than
    50
  • Evidence-Based Hospital Referral (EHR)
  • Patients risk of dying could be reduced by more
    than 30
  • ICU Physician Staffing (IPS)
  • Shown to reduce the risk of patients dying in the
    ICU by more than 10

7
The Leapfrog Group What
  • Recommendations regarding Critical Care
  • ICUs should be staffed by Board-certified
    intensivists, to coordinate and manage care of
    patients
  • Intensivists should staff ICUs during daytime
    hours, a minimun of 8 hours, 7 days a week
  • Intensivists should respond to more than 95 of
    calls for assistance within 5 minutes
  • The intensivist, a FCCS certified physician or
    physician extender should arrive at the bedside
    within 5 minutes in 95 of cases

8
The Leapfrog Group Why
  • ICU Physician Staffing (IPS)
  • More than 4 million patients are admitted to ICUs
    each year in he US 1
  • Mortality rates average 10 - 20 in most
    hospitals 2
  • Approximately 500,000 patients die in US ICUs
    each year 1
  • Quality varies widely across hospitals 3
  • Birkmeyer VD et al. Leapfrog safety standards
    potential benefits of universal adoption. The
    Leapfrog Group. Washington, DC 2000
  • Zimmerman JE et al. Evaluation of APACHE III
    predictions of hospital mortality in an
    independent database. Crit Care Med.
    1998261317-26.
  • Knaus WA et al. Variations in mortality and
    length of stay in intensive care units. Ann Int
    Med. 1993118753-61

9
The Leapfrog Group Why
  • Evidence Based Medicine in the ICU
  • Drakulovic, et al. Supine body position as a risk
    factor for nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically
    ventilated patients a randomized trial. Lancet
    1999354 1851.
  • Cook, et al. A comparison of sucralfate and
    ranitidine for the prevention of upper
    gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring
    mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 1998 338
    791
  • Attia, et al. Deep vein thrombosis and its
    prevention in critically ill adults. Arch Intern
    Med 2001 1611268
  • Pronovost et al. Improving Communication in the
    ICU using Daily Goals. J Crit Care 200318 vol 2
    71-75

10
The Leapfrog Group Why
  • Evidence Based Medicine in the ICU(contd)
  • Kress, et al. Daily interruption of sedative
    infusions in critically ill patients undergoing
    mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000
    3421471.
  • E. Wesley Ely. Effects on the duration of
    mechanical ventilation of identifying patients
    capable of breathing spontaneouly. N Engl J Med
    1996 335 1864.
  • Herbert, et al. A multicenter, randomized,
    controlled trial of transfusion requirements in
    critical care. N Engl J Med 1999 340 409.
  • Wu, et al. Blood transfusion in elderly patients
    with acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med
    2001 3451230.
  • Van den Berghe, et al. Intensive insulin therapy
    in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2001
    345 1359

11
The Leapfrog Group Why
  • Evidence Based Medicine in the ICU(contd)
  • Brown, et al. Effect of ICU mortality of a
    full-time critical care specialist. Chest.
    198996127-129 (ICU mort from 27.8 to 13.4,
    hospital mortality from 35.5 to 24.5)
  • Manthous, et al. Effects of a medical intensivist
    on patient care in a community teaching hospital.
    Mayo Clin Proc. 199772391-399 (Hospital
    mortality from 34 to 25 , hospital stay reduced
    by 5 days, improved housestaff knowledge)
  • Hanson, et al. Effects of an organized critical
    care service on outcomes and resource
    utilization a cohort study. Crit Care Med.
    199927270-274 (No effect on mortality fewer
    complication (0.5 vs 1.7 per patient) shorter
    ICU ( 2 vs 2.8 days) and hospital ( 20.3 vs 23.6
    days) stay lower cost (34,500 vs 47,500)

12
The Leapfrog Group Why
  • Review of published data regarding IPS in the Feb
    2004, Am J Med
  • Many of the Leapfrog groups standards for
    critical care are not grounded sufficiently in
    evidence to mandate their implementation
  • Outcomes of critically ill patients are better
    when their care is managed directly or with the
    help of intensivists 1
  • Pronovost et al. Physician staffing patterns and
    clinical outcomes in critically ill patients. A
    systematic review. JAMA. 200262151-2162.

13
The Leapfrog Group Where
  • Wave 1 - 2001
  • Atlanta, GA
  • California
  • Knoxville TN
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • St. Louis, MO
  • Seattle, WA
  • Michigan

14
The Leapfrog Group Where
  • Wave 2 - 2002
  • Central Florida
  • Colorado
  • Dallas-Fort Worth, TX
  • Kansas City, MO
  • Wisconsin
  • Massachusetts
  • Memphis, TN
  • New Jersey
  • New York Metro
  • Rochester, NY
  • Savannah, GA
  • Wichita, KS

15
The Leapfrog Group Where
  • Wave 3 - 2003
  • Hampton Roads, VA
  • Illinois
  • Maine

16
The Leapfrog Group
  • As of October 2003
  • Over 1000 hospitals voluntarily participated in
    the online survey to report their progress
    towards implementing the recommended practices
  • 5 of hospitals in the regional roll-outs report
    they have implemented CPOE, and an additional 17
    committed to implement CPOE by 2005
  • 21 have implemented ICU Physician Staffing and
    an additional 5.4 have committed to by 2004
  • 80 of health care consumers in the US now have
    access to patient safety data for one or more
    hospitals in their area

17
The Leapfrog Group DFW
  • DFWBGH is the local representative
  • 3 workgroups made up of system administrators,
    system administrators and DFWBGH members
  • ICU outcomes
  • CPOE
  • Evidence based referral
  • Meeting for about 1 year and have accomplished
    ????????

18
The Leapfrog Group
  • QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com