Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock

Description:

Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock Need for Testing New Stock Safety of new design Get natural frequency in various modes Level of comfort Performance of locos ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:286
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: pranjeevT
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock


1
Testing and Stability of Rolling Stock
2
Need for Testing New Stock
  • Safety of new design
  • Get natural frequency in various modes
  • Level of comfort
  • Performance of locos
  • Statutory requirements as per Policy Circular No
    6 of Rly. Bd.

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
Policy Circular No 6
  • No.92/CEDO/SR/4/0 dated 23/12/1999 issued by
    Member(Engg), Rly.Bd.
  • Contains rules for certification of maximum
    permissible speeds for rolling stock
  • Rly.Bd. is safety controlling authority for
    Indian Railways under Indian Railways Act
  • Responsibility delegated to RDSO
  • Determine recommend max permissible speed for
    new design rolling stock

6
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Zonal Rlys to apply for sanction through CRS to
    Rly Bd. for running new design stock on specific
    track taking into account
  • RDSO's recommendations of provisional/final speed
  • Condition and maintenance of
  • Track structure
  • Fixed structures , incl bridges OHE
  • Rolling stock
  • Maximum Moving Dimensions

7
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Definition of new rolling stock
  • Different principal dimensions
  • Different bogie design
  • New braking system
  • Change in axle load, track loading density,
    unsprung mass
  • Minor changes in design,internal layout(with
    sanction of CRS) only if leading to significant
    change in
  • C.G.,Weight distribution, ride behaviour

8
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Movement of newly designed rolling stock
  • From manufacturer/dock to destination/testing
    point
  • Not more than provisional speed
  • Determined by
  • RDSO's EDs(MP, Bridges Structures, Track)
  • Approved by CE,CME and CEE( for elect stock
    OHE)
  • CRS approval required for
  • Attachment to passenger carrying vehicle
  • Condonation for exceeding axle load
  • Condonation by Rly Bd for exceeding max moving
    dimensions

9
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Provisional Speed by EDs (MP),(Bridge
    Structures),(Track) of RDSO before deciding
    final speed
  • lt 80 for BG lt 60kmph for MG passenger stock ,
    lt65 for BG lt 45kmph for MG goods
  • With CRS sanction
  • lt 105 for BG lt 75 kmph for MG passenger stock
  • lt 75 for BG lt 50kmph for MG goods
  • Determined from design features and data or
    similar stock already in service
  • Valid for 5 years max

10
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Final speed of new stock decided by EDs (MP),
    (Track),(BridgeStructures)of RDSO
  • Based on experience with similar stock detailed
    oscillation trials
  • Detailed oscillation trials to be carried out by
    ED(Testing) after consulting EDs (MP), (Track),
    (Bridge Structure) Design directorate RDSO
  • After Jt safety certificate of zonal PHODs CRS
    approval
  • Evaluation based on Standing Criteria Committee
  • Speed certificate includes max no of locos in
    multiple Unit

11
Policy Circular No 6(contd.)
  • Types of trials -new stock
  • Detailed oscillation trials
  • Rating performance trials of locos
  • EBD(speed gt110 for passenger 75 for goods)
    Coupler force trials of trains
  • Signal Interference trials for Elect locos
  • Confirmatory oscillgraph car run on tracks above
    110Kmph
  • Route Proving run between 105-110 Kmph by zonal
    rly using portable accelerometers
  • Accel lt.3 g or lt.25 peaks/km for .3g lt accel lt
    .35g

12
Track and Related Issues
13
Indian Railway Track
  • Classified into two categories
  • Main Line (speed lt110)
  • High Speed
  • For speed upto 140 Kmph
  • Based on Vol-I of Civil and Mechanical Engg
    Report No-I (CM-I) dated May 1969 for Increase
    of Speed on DLI-HWH Route Feasibility Study
  • Track parameters
  • Unevenness of left right rail
  • Twist over 3.6m
  • Gauge Alignment

14
Indian Railway Track (Contd.)
  • Categorisation of track based on TRC data
  • Peak based
  • Recorded every
  • 3 months for Rajdhani routes
  • 4 months for A B routes (1660 sleeper/km)
  • 6 months for C D routes (1440 sleeper/km)
  • Separate category (i.e A,B,C,D) for each
    parameter
  • Twist A lt 1.39 lt B lt 2.08 lt C lt 2.78,Dgt2.78mm/m
  • Alignment A lt 3 lt Blt 5,C gt5mm versine /7.2m
  • Unevenness - A lt 6 lt B lt10 lt C lt15, Dgt15mm /3.6m
  • Gauge -A lt 3 lt B lt 6, Cgt 6mm loose/tight

15
Indian Railway Track (Contd.)
  • Categorisation of track based on TRC data(contd)
  • 10 peaks/km gt limits set for each category
    allowed
  • No of peaks gt B category limits is subscript
    e.g.
  • Ten peaks of 3mm/m of twist gt A10
  • Eleven peaks of 3mm/m of twist gt D11
  • Track maintenance standards
  • NOT SAFETY standards
  • Peak based
  • Standard deviation based

16
Indian Railway Track (Contd.)
  • Separate standards for
  • New track/relaying
  • Planned maintenance
  • Urgent maintenance
  • Max speed above and below 105 kmph

17
Derailment
  • Wheel climbing rail
  • Tight gauge
  • Due to excessive angle of attack
  • Sharp flange
  • Excessive wheel gauge(loose disc)
  • Sharp curve -too much versine
  • Excessive lateral force- Nadal's formula
  • Hy/Q (tanA-mu)/(1mu tanA) .997,
    where Aflange angle wrt to horizontal60degree
    s mu.27
  • Inadequate clearance between rail and check rail
    or space between them filled with grit
  • Usually on level crossings

18
Derailment
  • Wheel offloaded
  • Inadequate transition
  • Cant excessive
  • Uneven loading/empty between loaded wagons
  • Bumping on sudden acceleration / retardation
  • Excessive Twist -cause of derailments at
  • Low speed
  • Straight track

19
Derailment
  • Wheel offloaded due to resonance /excessive
    spring deflection
  • Due to inadequate ballast
  • Unevenness of track
  • Poor quality ballast -caked up
  • Poor damping
  • On multi-span bridges (more likely on steel
    girder type)

20
Resonance
21
Derailment
  • Wheel dropping between rails if track expands
  • Due to defective or inadequate fittings
  • Excessive track gauge
  • Track buckling due to
  • Inadequate stress relieving
  • Inadequate ballast
  • Wrong shape of ballast packing
  • Usually in hot summer during high temperatures

22
Derailment
  • Rail fractures due to
  • Inadequate stress relieving
  • Improper UFD
  • Inadequate ballast
  • Wheel flats?
  • Shifting of sleepers
  • Prude Homme's Limit (wooden sleeper)
  • Wrong shape of ballast packing

23
Track Measurements After Derailment
  • Type of Soil Ballast
  • Drainage
  • Sleeper Rails
  • Fastenings Joints
  • Location of Point of mount
  • Measurements from -90m 45m from zero station if
    cause of derailment is disputed else from zero
    station

24
Track Measurements After Derailment
  • Under load without load
  • Gauge
  • Cross Level
  • Versine on 20m cord
  • Transition
  • Length
  • Rate of change of superelevation
  • Unevenness in case of sags

25
Effect of Vibration on Human Body
26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Sperling's Ride Index
  • Human sensation of comfort proportional to
  • Displacement (sinusoidal)
  • Acceleration
  • Rate of change of acceleration
  • RI.896(g(f)b3/f)0.1, b acceleration amp
  • Ride comfort correction factor g(f) kf2
  • k.325 for vertical RI (0.5-5.4Hz)
  • k .8 for lateral RI (0.5-5.4 Hz)
  • k1 for goods stock

30
Oscillation trials of Rolling Stock
31
(No Transcript)
32
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • To evolve criteria for assessment of stability of
    rolling stock on IR,
  • Composition
  • Ed Testing, Convener
  • EDs (MP), (Carriage),(Wagon),(Research)
  • EDs (Track Design), (Track Machines)
  • ED Electric loco
  • Formulates oscillation trial procedure and
    Evaluation criteria

33
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Need for Oscillation trials
  • Establish vehicle is safe at desired speed
  • Stability of vehicle at that speed
  • Check vehicle oscillation behaviour
  • Check vehicle ride comfort
  • Test track should include
  • Straight 1 Km X 2
  • Station yard
  • 700-800 m Curve of about 2 degree

34
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Test track
  • Rundown track worse than 90 of IR track
  • On main line track
  • Include high speed (CM I vol I) for speed
    gt110kmph
  • Track geometry peak based track category
  • Main line B or C Unevenness Gauge, C or D
    Twist, C Alignment
  • CM Vol-I A or B Unevenness Gauge, B or C
    Twist, C Alignment
  • Long confirmatory run for 10-50kms with resonance
    check hard spots like L-Xing, Culverts, Bridges

35
(No Transcript)
36
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Test Speed (Loaded Empty)
  • Start with low speed (60kmph/80kmph)
  • Increase speed in increments of 5/10Kmph
  • Stop if any limit is exceeded
  • Max speed 10 higher than the proposed speed
  • Test vehicle to be last vehicle (except loco)
  • Free end bogie (leading bogie for loco) usually
    instrumented
  • Data acquisition system usually in oscillograph
    car

37
(No Transcript)
38
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Recording in both empty and loaded conditions
  • Transducer
  • Accelerometers kept at floor level above bogie
    pivot
  • Linear Variable Differential Transformer for
  • Spring deflections
  • Bogie rotation
  • Bolster Swing
  • Load cell for lateral force measurement at axle
    box level
  • (Pressure transducers for braking tests)

39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Data Acquisition System
  • Transducers
  • Signal Conditioners
  • Excitation to transducer (2.5 Khz, 5V AC)
  • Amplification
  • Frequency filtration (.5 to 15 Hz)
  • 5 Hz for coaches
  • 10 Hz for Wagons
  • Data recording
  • Chart Recorders
  • Computerised -using PCI/PXI DAQ card

45
(No Transcript)
46
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Criteria for locos
  • Hy2m lt.85(1P/3), P axle load (Prud Homme's
    limit)
  • Hy/Q (for gt1/20 sec) lt1
  • lt.3g accelerations in vertical lateral
    directions (isolated peak upto .35g if no
    resonance)
  • Ride index lt 4, preferred 3.75
  • Criteria for carriage
  • Ride index lt3.5,preferred 3.25 (upto 4 for
    EMU/DMU)
  • lt.3g accelerations in vertical lateral
    directions (isolated peak upto .35g if no
    resonance)

47
3rd Report of Standing Criteria Committee dated
January 2000
  • Criteria for Wagons
  • Hy2mlt.85(1P/3),P axle load (Prude Homme's
    limit)
  • Hy/Q (for gt1/20 sec) lt1
  • In case Hy cannot be measured,
  • Ride index lt 4.5, preferred 4.25
  • General stable running characteristics based on
  • Accelerations
  • Spring deflections

48
Thank You!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com