Red Lake Watershed District - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Red Lake Watershed District

Description:

Red Lake Watershed District Impoundments Within the Thief River Watershed RLWD Impoundments in the Thief River Watershed Moose River Impoundment North Pool South Pool ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:140
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 50
Provided by: CoreyH3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Red Lake Watershed District


1
Red Lake Watershed District
  • Impoundments Within the Thief River Watershed

2
RLWD Impoundments in the Thief River Watershed
  • Moose River Impoundment
  • North Pool
  • South Pool
  • Lost River
  • Elm Lake

3
Elm Lake (Farmes Pool)
4
Elm Lake Location
  • Marshall County, approximately 17 miles NE of
    Thief River Falls.
  • Drainage area of Ditch 200 above Elm Lake is 63
    sq. miles.

5
Elm Lake History
  • Elm Lake was drained around 1920 due to the
    construction of Branch 200 of JD 11.
  • Restoration project was a cooperative effort.
  • USFWS, MN DNR, RLWD, Ducks Unlimited
  • Majority of funding was from DU.
  • Largest DU project in the lower 48 states at the
    time
  • Cost
  • 2 Million
  • Operational 1991

6
Elm Lake Purpose
  • Multi-purpose
  • Flood Control
  • Increase Wildlife Values
  • Upstream drainage improvement

7
Elm Lake Flow Diagram
8
Elm Lake Outlet Structure
Outlet Structure
9
Elm Lake Operation and Maintenance
  • RLWD determines need for additional stop-logs to
    provide downstream flood control during
    significant flood events
  • Agassiz NWR responsible for operating outlet
  • Various other maintenance items are the
    responsibility of either the USFWS, State of
    Minnesota, or the RLWD.

10
Elm Lake Designed Storage
11
Elm Lake Actual Storage
12
Elm Lake Additional Comments
  • Investigative WQ monitoring on Ditch 200
  • 2004 Hydrograph

13
Lost River Pool
14
Lost River Location
  • Located in Marshall County, Grand Plain Township,
    approximately 20 miles NE of Thief River Falls.
  • The drainage area above the impoundment is 53
    square miles.

15
Lost River Flow Diagram
16
Lost River History and Purpose
  • Constructed in mid-1970s by the MN DNR to
    improve waterfowl habitat.
  • December 14, 1978 The RLWD MNDNR formally
    agreed to modify the impoundment by raising the
    elevation of the dike and emergency spillway.

17
Lost River - Description
  • Four 48 in. diameter gated pipes and a spillway
    from Ditch 200 of JD 11 supply water to the
    impoundment
  • Approximately 10 miles of earthen embankment, an
    outlet control structure, and an emergency
    spillway into Ditch 200
  • This impoundment is an off-channel reservoir.
  • Lost River Pool is now a multi-purpose
    impoundment
  • Wildlife and Flood Control

18
Lost River - Structure
  • Outlets to Marshall County Ditch 200

Stop-Logs
Screw Gate
19
Lost River Operation and Maintenance
  • Operation and maintenance is the responsibility
    of the state.
  • Cost - 109,000 to modify

20
Lost River Intended Storage
21
Lost River Actual Operation and Storage
22
Lost River 2004 Hydrograph
23
Moose River Impoundment
24
Moose River Impoundment - General
  • Cooperative effort between the RLWD and the MN
    DNR
  • 2 pool design
  • Flood Control and Wildlife Management
  • Built to reduce flood damages by impounding
    floodwaters in the upper reaches of the
    watershed.
  • Wildlife and rec. benefits enhanced by water
    retained in the two pools
  • Stream flow maintenance
  • Fire Control

25
Moose River Impoundment - Construction
  • Constructed on land managed by the MN DNR
  • 3.4 Million total construction cost
  • 1,690,000 State of Minnesota
  • 612,000 Red Lake Watershed District
  • 1,126,000 Red River Watershed Management Board
  • Operational in 1988

26
Moose River ImpoundmentWatershed Boundary
27
Moose River Dike Cross Section
28
Moose River Impoundment Water Control Structures
29
Moose RiverFlow Diagram
30
Moose River Impoundment Operation and Maintenance
  • RLWD responsible for operation of floodgates
  • Local person monitors and records elevations and
    stream gages, also operates the floodgates as
    directed by the RLWD
  • Outflows from pools coordinated with Agassiz NWR
    and Thief Lake WMA
  • Maintenance is the responsibility of the RLWD and
    the State

31
Moose RiverImpoundmentStream Gage Sites and
Drainage Areas
32
Moose River Impoundment Functional Design Data
33
Moose River Impoundment Water Storage
34
Moose River Impoundment Water Storage
35
Moose River Impoundment North Pool
36
Moose River North Pool Purpose and History
  • Outlets into the Moose River (JD 21)
  • Major Components
  • 5 miles of diversion ditch
  • 4 miles of earthen dike (top elevation 1218)
  • One gated outlet structure
  • One rock lined emergency spillway (elev. 1216)
  • Approx. 1/3 (41.7 sq. mi.) of the total Moose
    River Impoundment project drainage area drains to
    the Moose River

37
Moose River Impoundment North Pool
  • Actual Operation and Total Storage

38
Moose River Impoundment North Pool 2004
Hydrograph
39
Moose River Impoundment South Pool
40
Moose River Impoundment South Pool
  • Outlets into the Mud River (JD 11)
  • Major Components
  • 3 miles of diversion ditch
  • 9 miles of earthen dike (elevation 1220)
  • 4 miles of earthen dike between N S pools (1220)
  • Inter-pool structure which may be used to pass
    water between the pools
  • 2 rock-lined emergency spillways (at elevation
    1218)
  • Approximately 2/3 (83.3 sq. mi.) of the total
    project drainage area (125 sq. mi.) drains to the
    Mud River

41
Moose River South Pool -
  • Actual Operation and Total Storage

42
Moose River Impoundment South Pool 2004
Hydrograph
43
Moose River Impoundment Additional Comments
  • Maintenance Issues

44
Water Quality Monitoring
45
Water Quality Monitoring
46
Water Quality Monitoring
  • RLWD
  • At least 4 times per year
  • Field Measurements of turbidity, transparency,
    dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature,
    stage
  • Samples collected for total phosphorus,
    orthophosphorus, total suspended solids, total
    dissolved solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen,
    nitrates nitrites, ammonia nitrogen, fecal
    coliform, e-coli

47
Water Quality Monitoring
  • Grygla River Watch
  • Monthly during open water
  • Field Measurements of turbidity, transparency,
    dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature,
    stage

48
Water Quality Monitoring Results
  • No impairments for turbidity found on the Moose
    or Mud Rivers
  • DO is low on Moose Mud Rivers
  • Moose River.
  • P and N are high relative to ecoregion values
  • Mud River
  • P is high compared to ecoregion values.
  • Thief River will be impaired for turbidity from
    Thief Lake to Thief River Falls
  • Source ??? Complicated question, will need
    better understanding of the w-shed, further study
    research

49
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com