Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad Vessel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad Vessel

Description:

Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad Vessel David Clift, P.Eng. Production Manager Ellett Industries September 14, 2005 Abstract Serviceability depends ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: DavidC217
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad Vessel


1
Manufacture and Testing of a Large Zirconium Clad
Vessel
David Clift, P.Eng. Production Manager Ellett
Industries September 14, 2005
2
Abstract
  • Serviceability depends upon the quality of the
    clad corrosion liner
  • Careful application of design details, skilled
    trades systematic application of manufacturing
    controls and non-destructive examination.

3
Zirconium Clad Steel Reactor
3.6m diameter x 6.5m length (11 10 x 21 2
Shells are 22mm (7/8) thick SA516-70 with 3mm
(0.12) nominal, 2.28mm (0.090) minimum,
thickness Zirconium 702 explosion clad liner. The
hot pressed heads are of 37mm (1.5) SA516-70
with a 4.7mm (3/16) nominal thickness of clad
liner
4
Design Details
Separation of Longitudinal Circumferential Welds
Advantages
  • Containment of possible breaches
  • Efficient gas purging
  • Simplified helium testing

5
Material Procurement
  • Base Metal N.D.E.
  • ASME SA 578 Level C
  • grid pattern or continuously scanned - grid
    pattern is standard
  • three inspection levels
  • A- least , B - moderate, C - most demanding
    allows a discontinuity smaller than can be
    contained within a 25mm circle
  • Cladding N.D.E.
  • full compliance with ASME Section VIII IX
  • production bend tests, PT examination and 100 RT
    before bonding
  • PT after bonding and, in the case of the heads,
    after forming. All clad surfaces were visually
    examined

6
Ultrasonic Examination of Bonding
ASTM B 898 Acceptance Criteria
  • Class C is the standard Inspection Class of B
    898
  • Class B was specified for this project

7
Explosive Cladding
  • Current Practice
  • an interlayer of titanium when zirconium cladding
    exceeds 6.4 mm (1/4) nominal thickness
  • Explosion detonation (booster) locations
  • corner, side or center of plates
  • an area of ultrasonic non-bond is typically
    located under the detonation point
  • non-bond related to the size of charge

8
Vessel Plate Manufacture
  • Central explosion detonation points for both
    shell and head plates on this unit
  • thin cladding, thick backing plates
  • ASTM B 898 Inspection Class B ultrasonic
    inspection (75mm maximum indication size)
  • Results
  • non-bond areas in shell plate were acceptable
  • head plate detonation points were removed as
    cut-outs for centrally located nozzles

9
Plate Surface Defects
  • Damaged areas of clustered gouges were noted on
    three of the six shell plates
  • Gouge depth ranged from 1.2mm (0.047) to 2.4mm (
    0.094) deep
  • Gouge size varied less than 13 cm2 (2 in2) in
    area
  • Root cause - rock fall that occurred during
    underground explosive blasting

10
Repair Plan
  • Weld repair
  • shallow gouges (lt1.2mm deep) were weld repaired
    in conformance with ASTM B 898.
  • Controls
  • customer approval
  • carbide burr removal
  • qualified weld overlay repair
  • PT inspect
  • fully documented

11
Repair Plan - contd
  • Deep gouges
  • Individually ported batten style covers

12
Vessel Seam Weld Test Sequence
  • Carbon steel welds are applied and specified NDE
    performed prior to batten strap attachment
  • UT the cladding bond adjacent to the end of the
    longitudinal seam filler strips to find potential
    leak paths
  • Fit weld longitudinal batten strips, silver
    braze to isolate and helium bubble test _at_ 1 bar
    pressure
  • Circumferential welds performed in a similar
    manner
  • Confirming PT of all ZR welds per ASME

13
Fabrication - Cleanliness
  • Tool surfaces to be of alloy, plated or hardened
    steel
  • Rolls brake forming surfaces - confirmed free
    of all surface defects contamination
  • Weld joint design should minimize carbon steel
    welding grinding on process surfaces
  • Zirconium weld zones are mechanically and
    chemically cleaned prior to welding

14
Final Cleaning
  • Contaminated areas abrasively ground
  • Acid wash with HF/HNO3
  • Ferroxyl test per ASTM A 380
  • spray application of the potassium ferricyanide
    test solution on suspect areas
  • reacts with free iron to form a blue indication

15
Helium and Hydro Testing
  • Helium Mass Spectrometer testing per ASME Section
    V, Article 10, Appendix IV was performed before
    and after hydro testing
  • Purging batten strip cavities
  • helium from bubble testing conducted up to a
    month earlier had to be purged with clean dry
    air to eliminate false indications
  • Test conditions
  • 25 of the vessels maximum allowable working
    pressure (50 psig)
  • approx 20 helium concentration

16
Test Results
  • Results
  • All purge vents located behind nozzle liners,
    seams and internal batten style patches were
    vacuum sniffed
  • All readings remained at a background or
    atmospheric helium concentration - equivalent to
    a leak of 5 x 10-6 atm cc/sec

17
Additional Research
  • Preparation and analysis of a zirconium weld
    overlaid coupon to assess built-up metal quality
  • CS - TI - ZR construction

After welding and step machining
Prepared block ready to weld overlay
18
Results
  • ZR overlay welding on both the titanium
    interlayer and the zirconium cladding, min
    thickness .76mm
  • Test results confirm a composition containing
    titanium and zirconium
  • No detectable iron was present in any of the test
    samples
  • 100 Zr when a 0.76mm thick layer was applied
    over a combined thickness of Ti and ZR of 3.05mm.
    The actual thickness of the ZR alone in this case
    was 1.3mm

19
Questions
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com