ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY STRATEGIES AND THE ROLE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY STRATEGIES AND THE ROLE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS

Description:

... SMALL CUSTOMERS German Gas Heating Invest in gas furnace Commuter Railroads Invest in suburban residences Airline Frequent Flyer Volume discount at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: JoseAGom4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY STRATEGIES AND THE ROLE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS


1
ALTERNATIVE REGULATORY STRATEGIES AND THE ROLE OF
PRIVATE CONTRACTS
  • José A. Gómez-Ibáñez
  • ACCC, July 2010
  • OUTLINE
  • SOURCES OF MONOPOLY POWER
  • ANALOGY TO PROCUREMENT
  • RANGE OF REGULATORY STRATEGIES
  • ROLE OF PRIVATE CONTRACTS

2
SOURCES OF MONOPOLY POWER
  • Usual explanation Economies of scale
  • Cost/customer
  • Number of customers
  • But also requires durable, immobile and costly
    investments by
  • Infrastructure users, and
  • Infrastructure suppliers

3
  • Classic example Municipal piped water
  • Street with 2 small pipes
  • Street with 1 large pipe

4
  • Durable, immobile, and costly investments
  • Make investors vulnerable to opportunistic
    behavior by others
  • Are common throughout economynot just
    infrastructure
  • Usually solved by long-term private contracts

5
TRANSACTION COSTS(Ronald Coase, Oliver
Williamson, Douglas North)
  • TRANSACTION COSTS
  • Costs of negotiating and enforcing agreements
  • Arise because
  • Not omniscient Hard to know every fact,
    anticipate every development
  • Not saints Parties will behave opportunistically
    by withholding information
  • Influence organization of economic activity

6
ANALOGY TO PROCUREMENTMAKE OR BUY
  • WHO MANAGES PRODUCTION?
  • Independent suppliers
  • Purchasing firm
  • Buy on spot market
  • Make internally (vertical integration)

7
THE EXTREME OPTIONS
  • BUY ON SPOT MARKET
  • Pro Competition
  • Reliability
  • Con No relationship-specific
  • investments
  • MAKE INTERNALLY
  • Pro Relationship-specific
  • investments easy
  • Con Must manage internally

8
INTERMEDIATE OPTIONS
  • WHO MANAGES PRODUCTION?
  • Independent suppliers
  • Purchasing firm
  • Buy on spot market
  • Classical contract
  • Relational contract
  • Make internally (vertical integration)

9
INTERMEDIATE OPTIONS
  • CLASSICAL CONTRACT
  • Pro Contract limits opportunism
  • Con Risk of incomplete
  • contract
  • RELATIONAL CONTRACT
  • Pro Flexibility
  • Con Requires extra-contractual
  • limit on opportunism
  • Corruption in procurement
  • (principal-agent problem)

10
PROCUREMENT OPTIONS
  • If relationship specific investments important
  • If hard to write complete contract
  • If few extra-contractual limits on opportunism
  • Spot market
  • Classical contract
  • Relational contract
  • Make internally

11
REGULATORY OPTIONS
  • WHO DECIDES?
  • (PRICE QUALITY)
  • Markets
  • Politics
  • Spot markets
  • Public enterprise

12
REGULATORY OPTIONS
  • WHO DECIDES?
  • (PRICE QUALITY)
  • Markets
  • Politics
  • Spot market
  • Private long-term contracts
  • Concession contract
  • Discretionary regulation
  • Public enterprise

13
INTERMEDIATE OPTIONS
  • PRIVATE CONTRACTS
  • Customers contract directly with infrastructure
    supplier
  • CONCESSION CONTRACTS
  • Government contracts with infrastructure supplier
    on customers behalf
  • DISCRETIONARY REGULATION
  • Government regulators set price and service
    standards for infrastructure suppliers
  • (Examples US cost-of-service regulation, UK
    price cap regulation)

14
CONCESSION CONTRACTS
  • PRO
  • Contract prevents opportunism
  • Fair if competitively tendered
  • CON
  • Risk of incomplete contract
  • Consumers may not trust government to negotiate
    on their behalf

15
DISCRETIONARY REGULATION
  • PRO
  • Flexibility to cope with unforeseen
  • CON
  • Technically difficult (information asymmetry)
  • Risk of regulatory capture

16
PRIVATE vs. CONCESSION CONTRACTS
  • PRO
  • Easier to write complete contract
  • Easier to tailor services to customer
  • Easier to renegotiate if incomplete
  • CON
  • Transactions costs may be high relative to value
    of contract
  • Multiple sunk investments of different duration

17
PRIVATE CONTRACTS LARGE CUSTOMERS
  • U.S. Freight Railroads
  • 19th Century Private contracts
  • 1887 Interstate Commerce Act bans discrimination
  • 1950s Railroad decline
  • 1980 Railroad deregulation restores contracts
  • Traffic up 67, tariffs down 51, profitability
    restored
  • Contracts play major role 94 of captive
    traffic, 70 of all traffic
  • Small shippers a problem

18
PRIVATE CONTRACTS SMALL CUSTOMERS
  • German Gas Heating
  • Invest in gas furnace
  • Commuter Railroads
  • Invest in suburban residences
  • Airline Frequent Flyer
  • Volume discount at dominated hubs

19
REGULATORY OPTIONS
  • If durable, immobile investments
  • If hard to negotiate individual contracts
  • If hard to write complete contract
  • If few institutional limits on opportunism
  • Spot market
  • Private long-term contracts
  • Concession contract
  • Discretionary regulation
  • Public enterprise

20
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com