Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres

Description:

Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres Summary: Patrick Wilkinson Critique: James Silva Overview Introduction to Industrial Metabolism The Materials ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:67
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: pawi7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Industrial Metabolism: Theory and Policy Robert U. Ayres


1
Industrial MetabolismTheory and PolicyRobert
U. Ayres
  • Summary Patrick Wilkinson
  • Critique James Silva

2
Overview
  • Introduction to Industrial Metabolism
  • The Materials Cycle
  • Measures of Industrial Metabolism
  • Policy Implications of the Industrial Metabolism
    Perspective

3
Introduction to Industrial Metabolism
  • Definition the whole integrated collection of
    physical processes that convert raw materials and
    energy, plus labor, into finished products and
    wastes in a (more or less) steady-state
    condition.
  • Metabolism Analogous to the process of a living
    organism
  • Takes in food for self/storage and excretes
    wastes.
  • Differences
  • Organisms reproduce themselves, specialized,
    change over long period of time.
  • Firms produce products or services, not
    specialized, can change quickly

4
The Materials Cycle
  • Closed cycles are self-sustaining with no
    external sources or sinks and are in steady
    state.
  • Open cycles are unsustainable, using materials
    without replenishing sources.
  • Must stabilize or will ultimately fail
  • The Biological cycle is a closed cycle, while
    our industrial cycle is an open cycle.

5
The Material Cycle
  • Industrial system of today Unsustainable
  • Can this stabilization be obtained with a
    technological fix?
  • If so, how?
  • If not, how long will the current system last?
  • Biological system
  • Has not always been a closed system
  • Responded to inherently unstable situations
    (open cycles) by inventing new processes
    (organisms) to stabilize the system by closing
    the cycles.
  • Time scales
  • Biological system took billions of years
  • Industrial system does not have that much time

6
Measures of Industrial Metabolism
  • Recycling and dissipative loss are the fates of
    all waste materials
  • There are 3 classes of materials use
  • Those that are recyclable under present
    technology and cost
  • Those that are recyclable, but not under present
    tech. and cost
  • Those that are not recyclable
  • For the industrial system to function as a closed
    cycle, it must recycle or reuse nearly all
    materials

7
Measures of Industrial Metabolism
  • Examples of dissipative use Class 3 materials
  • Sulfur
  • CFCs
  • Ammonia
  • Phosphoric acid
  • Chlorine
  • Although can be classified as class 2 when used
    in plastics and solvents

8
Measures of Industrial Metabolism
  • Potentially recyclable materials
  • Are they being recycled and reused?
  • Recycle (reuse) vs. Dissipation of a material
    shows how far sustainability is from being reached

9
Policy Implications of the Industrial Metabolism
Perspective
  • Industrial metabolism is holistic in theory
  • All interactions are considered together
    resulting in the best for the system as a whole
  • Short term solutions and policies, however, are
    being enforced
  • Such policies are usually more harmful and costly
    in the long run
  • Ex.s Pollution and coal as a fuel
  • Air and water pollution reduced, but land
    disposal increased
  • Clean coal technology could extend coal as fuel,
    but effects of byproducts extended as well

10
Critique
  • Sulfur Example
  • Comparison human vs. natural
  • Material Source vs. Material Path
  • A more holistic view

11
Sulfur Example
  • Example of Dissipative use
  • Nearly all sulfur mined is dissipated or
    discarded
  • Mostly used for sulfuric acid used in
    non-recyclable chemicals
  • Thus sulfur mainly falls into the third category
  • But plaster-of Paris

12
Comparison human vs. natural
  • Where is the natural to compare with the
    anthropogenic?
  • What are the percentages referring to?
  • In all cases, with the possible exception of
    nitrogen, the anthropogenic contributions exceed
    the natural flows by a considerable margin.
  • Really?

13
Comparison human vs. natural (Can you interpret
this?)
14
Material Source vs. Material Path
  • Should be less concerned with how much of
    something is left than with what path used
    material takes
  • How much oil/steel/etc. is left to be extracted
    from natural sources is not a good measure of
    evaluation for industrial processes
  • A better way is to quantify how much recycling of
    material is going on What do we do with what we
    use?

15
A more holistic view
  • Defines it more by what it is not
  • Contrasts with narrowly conceived or short-run
    (myopic) quick fix policies
  • Longer pipelines for sewage
  • Air vs. water vs. land
  • Not an in-depth application paper
  • Less than 15 pages
  • The industrial system of tomorrow?

16
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com