WLAN QoS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

WLAN QoS

Description:

WLAN QoS Ronald Lucas Introduction With the emergence of Voice Over IP, requirements to support Voice Over IP over Wireless LAN s without degradation of it s ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: Lap5177
Learn more at: http://faculty.wiu.edu
Category:
Tags: qos | wlan | automatic | control

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WLAN QoS


1
WLAN QoS
  • Ronald Lucas

2
Introduction
  • With the emergence of Voice Over IP, requirements
    to support Voice Over IP over Wireless LANs
    without degradation of its quality of service
    has become very important.
  • A quality of service focused MAC Layer standard,
    IEEE 802.11e was developed to meet these
    requirements.

3
Introduction cont.
  • Voice over IP over Wireless LANs is more
    compelling since you can install these Wireless
    LANs in public spaces, which are backed up by
    the Internet.
  • This allows for users to have telephone service
    without wires anywhere that the Wireless LAN is
    located.

4
Introduction cont.
  • IEEE 802.11e enables frames from quality of
    service sensitive applications to be transmitted
    sooner than other frames, which minimizes
    latency.
  • IEEE 802.11e also has new power management
    features that will help with the life of the
    mobile device being used.
  • IEEE 802.11e has channel-use efficiency gains,
    which allow for privileged treatment to any
    type.
  • IEEE 802.11e also prioritizes time-critical data.
  • IEEE 802.11e will work with 802.11-compliant
    devices.

5
Channel Access
  • IEEE 802.11e provides contention-based and polled
    access mechanisms, these are both enhancements to
    the 802.11 mechanisms.
  • This leads to the reduction of access delay and
    jitter in delivering QoS-sensitive frames from
    the source to the destination.
  • WLAN served by an AP, allow stations to
    communicate directly with one another.
  • Transmit Opportunity (TXOP), allows a station to
    transmit a sequence of frames without having to
    contend for a channel, following a successful
    channel access attempt.

6
Legacy Contention-Based Channel Access
  • The legacy contention-based access mechanism,
    distributed coordination function, each station
    listens to the channel and if it is busy,
    postpones the transmission and enters the backoff
    procedure.
  • This is done by deferring transmissions by a
    random time, which avoids collision between
    multiple stations, which would otherwise attempt
    to transmit after the completion of the current
    transmission.

7
Contention-Based Channel Access
  • This extends the 802.11 standard to provide frame
    prioritization, frames of higher priority will
    access the channel sooner.
  • MAC protocol for 802.11e contention-based channel
    access is CSMA/CA, which use the parameters
    contention window min and contention window max,
    which the values assigned cause the window to be
    shorter or longer.
  • 802.11e will allow a station consecutive
    transmissions of frames from the same access
    category without the need for backoff by using
    spacing between consecutive frames.
  • 802.11e will drop frames once the expiration of
    the frames based on the time queued has been
    meet.

8
TCMA MAC Protocol
  • CSMA/CA protocol, a station engaged in backoff
    countdown must wait while the channel is idle for
    time equal to DIFS before decrementing its
    backoff immediately following a busy period, or
    before attempting transmission.
  • TCMA (Tiered-Contention Multiple Access)
    protocol, variable lengths of this time interval,
    which is called Arbitration-Time Inter-Frame
    Space (AIFS), lead to varying degree of
    accessibility to the channel.
  • A shorter AIFS will give a station an advantage
    in contending for channel access.

9
802.11e Polled Channel Access
  • The improved PCF polled channel access mechanism
    is the 802.11e HCF controlled channel access.
  • It resembles the PCF, but polling is not limited
    to the contention-free period, the polling
    schedule is tailored to the time profile of the
    individual traffic streams which reduce overhead,
    delay, and jitter, and uplink transmit
    opportunity (TXOPs) cause frames to be
    transmitted sooner.
  • 802.11e polled access mechanism results in a
    polling schedule that better matches the
    generation of frames in a periodic traffic
    stream, allowing for superior delay/jitter
    performance and better channel use efficiency.

10
Admission Control
  • Admission control provides bandwidth management
    to ensure that QoS-sensitive applications, such
    as voice and video, will have satisfactory QoS.
  • Overloading WLANs with excessive number of users
    with high-priority access would lower the QoS,
    therefore requests are submitted by stations for
    the admission to specific traffic streams to the
    AP, which accepts or declines.

11
Admission Control for Contention-Based Channel
Access
  • This is an optional feature for a station and AP,
    the AP decides to allow stations that employ
    contention-based access in the WLAN to transmit
    traffic using the parameters of an access
    category.
  • The AP then can track and manage bandwidth use
    and it is also not necessary to impose admission
    control on all access categories.
  • The AP advertises to the WLAN the access
    categories that are protected by the admission
    control.
  • A stations request, submitted by and add Traffic
    Specification (ADDTS) frame, describes the
    traffic stream to be admitted. The response to
    the ADDTS, if accepted, furnishes in the Medium
    Time field the channel time the station is
    allocated for uplink transmissions.

12
Admission Control for Polled Channel Access
  • Admission Control is automatic when using a
    polled channel access, the AP will reject an add
    Traffic Specification (ADDTS) request if it
    cannot meet the requirements for a service period
    schedule requested by a station for a traffic
    stream.
  • The priority of a traffic stream may be
    considered in admission control, an admission
    control request from traffic stream with a higher
    priority may cause an admitted stream to be
    dropped.

13
Power Management
  • 802.11e standard amendment offers new mechanisms
    to help battery-powered devices conserve power by
    enabling them to power down their receivers and
    transmitters intermittently without loosing
    connectivity or data.
  • A station will inform the AP of being in either
    power saving mode, or active.
  • This is done by changing the Power Management bit
    in the frame control field, when the frame is
    being sent by the station.

14
Legacy Power-Save Mechanism
  • Frames buffered at the AP for a power-saving
    station employing contention-based access are
    delivered when the station sends a special
    control frame, the power save poll.
  • The AP sends a single buffered frames to a
    station after receiving a power save poll,
    immediately or soon after.
  • More power save polls are required in order ro
    retrieve additional buffered frames.
  • Stations using legacy power-save mode rely on
    traffic indication map (TIM) to learn if the AP
    holds buffered data for it.
  • A power-saving station that supports legacy
    polled access need not send PS-polls in order to
    retrieve its buffered frames.

15
Automatic Power Save Delivery
  • This is the delivery of unicast frames from the
    SP to a power-saving station, this is done to
    reduce the signaling traffic caused by power save
    poll and their acknowledgements.
  • The AP may deliver buffered frames to their
    destination power-saving stations either on a
    previously negotiated time or in response to
    receiving transmissions from the station that
    trigger such delivery.

16
Scheduled Automatic Power Save Delivery
  • This mechanism is good for voice, and
    audio/video, because the downlink transmissions
    to power-saving devices will occur at a schedule
    that is known in advance, thus obtaining the need
    for special signaling between the station and AP.
  • The AP and the station negotiate a time in
    advance in which the station will be fully
    powered and will be able to receive any frames
    that are buffered for it at the AP.

17
Full Unscheduled Automatic Power Save Delivery
  • This was introduced for stations accessing the
    channel by contention, to enhance the efficiency
    of legacy power save.
  • A power-saving station may use a PS-Poll, any
    data, and Null frame (trigger frames) to notify
    the AP that it is fully powered and ready to
    receive transmissions.
  • The same as legacy power-save mechanism, a
    station can learn about its buffer status by
    listening to the beacons for its TIM.

18
Hybrid Unscheduled Automatic Power Save Delivery
  • This allows a station to choose between legacy
    power save delivery and automatic power save
    delivery based on access category.
  • Trigger frames are used to initiate the delivery
    of buffered frames associated with access
    categories that have been designated delivery
    enabled.
  • The station also designates in advance the access
    categories of the frames that may serve as
    trigger frames.

19
QoS in Wireless Mesh Networks
  • Wireless mesh takes on many forms, the most
    common is a collection of nodes that form an ad
    hoc network and are capable of serving as WLAN
    APs.
  • These nodes are called mesh points, can forward
    traffic received from 802.11 stations to other
    mesh points with ultimate destinations that
    include WLAN stations attached to other mesh
    points somewhere on the wired networks.
  • Protocols for forwarding, routing, and channel
    access must be specified for the mesh points,
    which requires an ad hoc networking standard with
    multi-hop capability.
  • A wireless mesh network can be used to enable
    WLAN service when wiring for APs is not readily
    available in an enterprise, or for a temporary
    network that can be easily set up and torn down.
  • There are challenges in routing and security,
    especially when mobility is contemplated.
  • It is not clear what choices will ultimately be
    made for the IEEE 802.11 mesh standard.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com