Animal Selection and Evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Animal Selection and Evaluation

Description:

Animal Selection and Evaluation Livestock Evaluation Why Evaluate Livestock? Success in the production of livestock depends on the ability to select animals efficient ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: BEC142
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Animal Selection and Evaluation


1
Animal Selection and Evaluation
  • Livestock Evaluation

2
Why Evaluate Livestock?
  • Success in the production of livestock depends on
    the ability to select animals efficient in their
    production and reproduction capabilities.
  • Develop ability to recognize carcass and breeding
    merit, as well as, understand the economic value
    differences when comparing livestock.

3
To Predict Production Performance...
  • Rate of gain is amount of weight gained on a per
    day basis.
  • Feed efficiency is the amount of feed consumed
    divided by the amount of weight gained.
    Approximate estimate for each specie (lbs. of
    feed/lbs. of gain) Cattle 71, Sheep 51, Swine
    31.

4
To Predict Production Performance...
  • Livestock with greater length, width, and depth
    of body tend to have a greater ability to grow
    and gain at a faster rate.
  • Performance capabilities are difficult to predict
    from visual evaluation. Production and
    performance records of relatives are good
    indicators.

5
To Predict Production Performance...
  • Performance records of relatives help to estimate
    growth potential of the individual. Terminology
    used is
  • Cattle birth weight, weaning weight, yearling
    weight, etc.
  • Swine 21 day litter weight, days to 230 lbs.,
    sow productivity index, etc.
  • Sheep type of birth (single, twins, triplets),
    90 day weight, ewe index, etc.

6
To Predict Production Performance...
  • There is no agreement as to the ideal size or
    weight of any species. This is influenced by
  • Economy feed prices, production costs, supply
    and demand for meat.
  • Consumer fat content and portion size of
    product.
  • Environment Amount and quality of feed
    resources, temp., rainfall, etc.

7
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Beef Cattle
  • Calving ease may be estimated to a certain extent
    by estimating
  • Width b/t pin bones. More width generally
    indicates greater width in the birth canal.
  • Slope of rump. Pin bone should be slightly below
    the hook bone when the animal is viewed from the
    side.
  • Shoulder should blend smoothly into the neck at
    both the top and bottom of the shoulder when
    viewed from the front.

8
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Beef Cattle
  • Milking ability may be estimated by
  • Udder development, teat placement, and teat
    quality.
  • Examine past production record of the dam and
    female offspring of the sire.
  • Production records from the parents are the best
    way to evaluate reproductive performance and
    capabilities.

9
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Beef Cattle
  • Skeletal soundness
  • If properly designed, an animal should have free,
    easy movement.
  • If an animal has mobility problems at an early
    age and light weight, it will only be magnified
    in later life.
  • The animals feet, legs and body should indicate a
    long, productive life.

10
Correct (Right) / Incorrect (Left) Structures
11
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Sheep
  • Production records from the dam are used
    extensively. They should provide the following
  • Multiple birth ability.
  • Number of lambs raised vs. number born.
  • Weaning weight, milking ability.

12
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Sheep
  • Skeletal correctness
  • Straight lined, level top, and legs are straight,
    and set wide apart, both front and rear.
  • Must have freedom of movement.
  • Growth potential
  • Select sheep that have the ability to grow
    rapidly
  • Capacity length, width, and depth of body

13
Correct Structure
14
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Swine
  • Production records are very useful in identifying
    superior individuals.
  • Litter size, number of pigs born vs. number
    raised.
  • Litter weight.
  • Slow productivity index.
  • Days to 230 lbs.

15
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Swine
  • Skeletal correctness
  • It is essential that hogs are structurally
    correct because many are raised in confinement
    systems (i.e., concrete slotted floor buildings)
  • More early level rump and top, sound feet and
    legs, width of body, and long and fluid stride.
  • Growth potential Hogs with more capacity have a
    tendency to grow more rapidly.

16
Correct (left)/Incorrect (right) Structure
17
To Predict Reproductive Performance in Swine
  • Milking ability
  • Select gilts that have a minimum of 6 functional,
    evenly spaced nipples on each side of the
    underline.
  • Nipples should be prominent.
  • Avoid an underline that has several abnormalities
    (i.e., pin nipples, inverted, etc.)

18
Correct Nipple Structure
19
What is an Ideal Market Animal?
20
Beef
  • Ideal market beef should
  • Quality grade few choice which means marbling in
    the meat and under 24 months of age.
  • Yield grade 1 or 2 which means a minimum of fat
    and more muscle.
  • Average back fat of .4 in. (measured at 12th rib.)

21
Location of 12th Rib
22
Beef
  • Ideal market beef should
  • Required ribeye area Base 600 lb. carcass needs
    11.0 square in.
  • Yield a carcass weighing between 500 and 750 lbs.
    to best fit market demand.

23
Beef
  • The consumers recent trend toward health
    awareness has influenced the meat industry
    tremendously. For example
  • USDA grading procedures have changed. Greater
    value for lean, heavy muscled cattle.
  • Poultry and fish consumption have increased
    greatly due to their lower fat and lower
    cholesterol content.

24
Beef
  • The fat content in 7 cuts of beef rank between
    the chicken breast and thigh. (Not as fat as
    consumers think.)
  • The beef market is now focusing its promotion on
    what consumers want - - convenience.

25
Beef
  • Packer concerns
  • Cattle are purchased by the pound - fat is worth
    about 1/10 of what lean meat is worth.
  • Consequently, the packer loses money on fat
    cattle.

26
Beef
  • Producer concerns
  • Fat is less efficient to produce than muscle so
    cattle gaining fat eat the same amount of feed
    but gain less efficiently.
  • Packers do not want to buy cattle that are
    excessively fat.

27
Swine
  • Ideal market hog should
  • Be lean and heavy muscled.
  • Have a width through a ham equal to or greater
    than the width through the shoulder and both
    should be wider than the back.
  • Have average back fat thickness of less than 1.0
    inches (measured at the 10th rib).
  • Have a minimum of 5.0 in. of loin eye.

28
Location of 10th Rib
29
Swine
  • Ideal market hog should
  • Should be yield grade U.S. No. 1, which depends
    on the amount of back fat and muscle.
  • Carcass merit is an indication of the amount of
    muscle/meat the carcass contains.

30
Sheep
  • The ideal market lamb should
  • Be heavily muscled with superior conformation and
    correctness.
  • Have a 2.5 square in. ribeye or larger.
  • At market weight have .1 to .2 in. of back fat
    (measured at 12th rib) and be uniform in its fat
    cover.
  • Have a leg score of low choice or better.
  • Be uniform in its thickness from head to dock.

31
Location of 12th Rib
32
Sheep
  • The reasons for the change in the market lamb
    desired today are very similar to the reasons for
    the change in the type of market steer.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com