Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and Innovation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and Innovation

Description:

Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and Innovation Tamara Norris, Instructor SOWO 804 Organizational and Community Behavior School of Social Work – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: unc166
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and Innovation


1
Organizational Effectiveness, Change, and
Innovation
  • Tamara Norris, Instructor
  • SOWO 804 Organizational and Community Behavior
  • School of Social Work
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599

2
Building Evaluation CapacityinHuman Service
OrganizationsA Case Study Stevenson, J. F.,
Florin, P., Mills, D. S., Andrade, M. (2002).
Building evaluation capacity in human service
organizations A case study. Evaluation and
Program Planning, 25(3), 233-243.
3
Building Evaluation Capacity.
The Problem The government and other entities
that fund nonprofit human service organizations
are pressuring these agencies to better evaluate
outcomes, but many nonprofits simply dont have
the capacity to do so. The ResponseThe authors
undertook a three-year project to work with 13
local agencies in the state of Rhode Island to
enhance their ability to evaluate 14 substance
abuse prevention programs.
Stevenson, Florin, Mills, Andrade
4
Building Evaluation Capacity.
  • The intervention had four components
  • Conducting a needs assessment
  • Identifying and enhancing three exemplary
    evaluations to serve as models for the other
    programs.
  • On-site and telephone technical support upon
    request
  • Providing three training sessions later in the
    project
  • Planning
  • Implementation
  • Analysis and reporting

Low participant confidence was determined to be a
problem. Confidence in a different evaluation
skill was measured following each workshop.
Confidence levels rose after each workshop, but
they were short-lived.
Stevenson, Florin, Mills, Andrade
5
Five Business Trends.
  1. Quality and outcomes management
  2. Business and process re-engineering
  3. Knowledge management
  4. Capabilities-based competition
  5. Collaborate, consolidate, or die

http//socialent.aztech-cs.com/resources/articles/
five_business/
6
Five Business Trends.
  • Collaborate, Consolidate, or Die
  • People are reluctant to merge or collaborate
    because they fear a loss of independence
  • As long as leaders maintain a focus on the
    community, everyone will win
  • Why will such a focus ensure a positive outcome
    for all participants?

http//socialent.aztech-cs.com/resources/articles/
five_business/
7
Five Business Trends.
How will these business trends, if implemented,
affect community behavior?
http//socialent.aztech-cs.com/resources/articles/
five_business/
8
Building a Sustainable Innovation Organization
  • Teams of Empowered Employees
  • attract and retain good employees with
    applicable talents, skills and expertise
  • organize in small groups
  • delegate responsibility
  • http//www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/innovat
    ion_aweorg.html

9
Building a Sustainable Innovation Organization
  • Analyzing and Improving Organizations
  • The 7 Ss
  • Strategy?
  • Structure?
  • Systems?
  • Style?
  • Skills?
  • Staff?
  • Shared values?
  • http//www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/innovat
    ion_aweorg.html

10
Managing Innovation
  • Seven Areas of Innovation
  • Strategy
  • Business
  • Organizational
  • Product
  • Process
  • Technology
  • Marketing
  • http//www.1000ventures.com/business_guide/innovat
    ion_mgmt_main.html

11
Evaluation
  • Evaluation- Determines the Worth of a Thing
    Obtains Information for Use in Judging Worth of a
    Program, Product, Procedure, Objective

12
Evaluation (Contd)
  • Evaluation Systematic Process Designed to
    Reduce Uncertainty About the Effectiveness of a
    Particular Project
  • Evaluation Determines Whether Targets Have Been
    Met
  • Evaluation If Not Required Should Be Included
    for the Good of the Project

13
Evaluation (Contd)
  • Context Or Antecedent Evaluation
  • Answers the Question of What Factors/Risks Exist
    in the Projects Environment or History That May
    Influence Project Conduct and Outcomes. (Useful
    to Project Staff and Others, but Rarely
    Requested). Will Apprise Organization Staff of
    Environmental Variables That Could Contaminate
    Findings, or Inhibit Project Implementation
  • Formative Evaluation
  • Information Used to Improve Project During Its
    Operation. Primary Audience Is Organization
    Staff. Allows Modifications to Be Made.
    COUNTERPART TO THE PROCESS OBJECTIVE, Sometimes
    Called PROCESS EVALUATION. It Is ESSENTIALLY A
    GOOD MANAGEMENT TOOL. (Rarely Requested by
    Funding Sources in a Direct Way.)

14
Evaluation (Contd)
  • Summative/Product Evaluation
  • Involves Collecting Data to Determine the
    Ultimate Success of the Completed Project. Major
    Purpose Is to Document the Extent to Which the
    Projects Proposed Outcomes Were Achieved.
    Funding Source Is Key Recipient.
  • Pay-Off/Impact Evaluation
  • Can Occur at Formative and Summative Stages.
    Concerned With Finding Out Whether Projects
    Achievement Are of VALUE. Value of Its Effects.
    (Useful to Wide Range of Audiences.)

15
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com