Occult Bacteremia in Infants - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Occult Bacteremia in Infants

Description:

Occult Bacteremia in Infants Current controversies and future developments Denise Watt Dec. 6, 2001 Outline background and epidemiology management algorithms evidence ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:108
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: libu180
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Occult Bacteremia in Infants


1
Occult Bacteremia in Infants
  • Current controversies and future developments
  • Denise Watt
  • Dec. 6, 2001

2
Outline
  • background and epidemiology
  • management algorithms
  • evidence for Abx
  • oral vs. parenteral
  • antibiotic resistance
  • pneumococcal conjugate vaccine

3
Case
  • 10 month old girl, previously well
  • URI symptoms x 10 days
  • drinking well, wetting diapers, no N/V/D
  • 2hr hx fever, lethargy, irritability
  • O/E 180, 42, T39.2, 95
  • looks unwell, moaning/crying, HEENT normal, clear
    BS, some indrawing, CVS normal, abd benign, no
    rash

4
Occult Bacteremia definitions
  • FWS
  • rectal temp ? 38?C, no focus, no obvious
  • virus, non-toxic, no significant underlying
  • illness/immunocompromise
  • OB
  • FWS and ve BC
  • 10-20 PED visits for febrile illness
  • 20 febrile children lt3yr no source

5
Epidemiology pre-HIB
  • prior to early 1990s
  • OB incidence 3-12 of FWS
  • 60-85 S.pneumo
  • 5-20 HIB
  • 40 complication rate

6
Epidemiology post-HIB
  • incidence of OB (FWS, 3-36 mos, T?39C)
  • 1.6-2.8, highest age 1-2 yr (Kupperman 1998, Lee
    1998)
  • 90-95 S.pneumo
  • 96 ? invasive HIB lt5 yr (Alpern 2000)
  • 5 non-typhoid Salmonella
  • others Neisseria, GAS, GBS, Moraxella, E.coli,
    S. aureus

7
Implications of OB
  • 10 SBI if untreated, 17 persistent bacteremia
    (Harper, Baraff)
  • meningitis 1 (Baraff), 2.7 (Rothrock)
  • 7.7 mort, 25-30 neuro sequelae
  • overall risk of meningitis in untreated FWS
    0.02-0.05
  • natural course of OPB?
  • 96 resolve without Abx (Alpern 2000)

8
Occult BacteremiaSubsequent development of focus
Dashefsky, J Pediatr 1983., Shapiro, J Pediatr
1986., Woods, AJDC 1990., Baraff, Pediatr Infect
Dis J 1992.
9
Local Microbiology
  • S. pneumo bacteremia rates vary widely across
    Canada
  • related to rates of BC drawn
  • rate in Calgary unknown
  • 30 OPB/yr, 10 SBI/yr, 4-5 meningitis/yr
  • 20 cases invasive HIB/yr (most adults)
  • 139 BC last year age 1-15 (all comers)
  • 27 contaminants

10
Predicting OB
  • Hx and PE unreliable
  • may appear well
  • subjective vs. objective toxicity
  • YOS gt10 sensitivity 77, specificity 88
  • age
  • fever
  • OPB rare if temp lt39.0 (lt1) 3.7 if gt40
  • similar response to defervescence OB (Baker
    1989, Bonadio 1993)

11
Predicting OB
  • lab tests insensitive
  • U/A most common occult bacterial infection (2
    febrile lt5yr)
  • WBC gt15x109 sens 67-80, spec 69
  • ANC best predictor (Kuppermann 1998)
  • gt10x109 sens 76, spec 78
  • band count unhelpful
  • one poke most practical (CBC hold BC)

12
Blood Cultures
  • 12 ves return for F/U before BC result, 50
    called back (Joffe 1992)
  • time to ve 36hr, time to F/U 43hr
  • most pathogens ve lt 18hr
  • F/U more important than BC
  • 76 SBI or PB called back (Bachur 2000)
  • BC allow earlier F/U and Rx
  • faster lab techniques coming?

13
Approach to FWS
  • lt2-3 mos, 3-36mos, gt3 yr treated differently
  • lt1980s, all pt lt3mos admitted for septic W/U and
    empiric Abx
  • low risk criteria developed to avoid hospital
    admission

14
Low-risk criteria
  • Rochester criteria 1985 (lt2 mos)
  • NPV 98.9, PPV 12
  • Boston criteria 1992 (lt3 mos)
  • NPV 95
  • Philadelphia criteria 1993 (1-2 mos)
  • NPV 99.7, PPV 14

15
Baraff
  • expert consensus (Pediatrics 1993)
  • 1-3 mos, low risk
  • option 1 septic W/U and Abx
  • option 2 urine CS and observe
  • 3-36 mos, non-toxic septic W/U if Tgt39.0
  • update (Annals Emerg Med 2000)
  • 3-36 mos
  • T?39.0 U/A T?39.5 WBC ? BC (send if gt15)
  • if empiric Abx, do LP!

16
Bachur 2001
  • Recursive partitioning model
  • U/A first step
  • WBC lt4 or gt20
  • T gt 39.6
  • age lt 13d
  • 82 sensitive
  • admit 28 (vs. 53 with Rochester)

17
Cost-Effectiveness of FWS strategies
  • 1990s BC and empiric Abx for all
  • Lee (Pediatrics 2001)
  • FWS, age 3-36 mos, OPB (1.5)
  • meningitis 1 outcome
  • incl. health care and societal costs
  • CE CBC selective BC Rx if WBC ?15
  • 30,800 / life-year saved
  • if rate OPB?, less aggressive aproach

18
Why guidelines need re-evaluation
  • controversy among experts
  • lower incidence of OB
  • elimination of HIB
  • cost and complications of tests and Rx
  • pen-resistant S. pneumo
  • not followed anyway (Finklestein 2000)
  • vaccine..

19
Antibiotics and FWS
  • Only 2 prospective RCTs with placebo
  • both small, pre-HIB
  • Jaffe 1987
  • no change in SBI
  • Abx ? fever, improved appearance
  • large, retrospective study (Harpur 1995)
  • more focal infection, admissions w/o Abx
  • Abx and meningitis (meta-analysis Baraff)
  • no Abx 5.8 oral or parenteral Abx 0.4

20
Rothrock 1997 Meta-analysis
  • not all RCTs, underpowered
  • no significant ? meningitis
  • significant ? SBI (OR 0.35 p0.003)
  • NNT to prevent 1 meningitis 651
  • NNT to prevent 1 SBI 2190
  • NNH with Abx for every meningitis prevented 567
  • no prospective studies post-HIB

21
Oral vs. Parenteral Antibiotics
  • Fleisher (1994)
  • no sign difference in focal infections
  • ? persistent fever with Ctx
  • not blinded, not intention-to-treat, pre-HIB
  • Rothrock (1997) meta-analysis
  • meningitis OR0.67 (oral vs. parenteral)
  • SBI OR1.48
  • closer F/U with parenteral

22
Risks of Empiric Antibiotics
  • cost (tests, Rx, F/U, hospitalization)
  • side effects
  • discomfort of tests, treatment
  • altered presentation (Rothrock 1992)
  • development of resistant strains
  • missed/partially Rx focal infections
  • parental preference?
  • will accept small risk of SBI vs. discomfort of
    tests Rx (Kramer, Oppenheim)

23
Penicillin-resistant Pneumococcus
  • Castillo
  • San Diego 1991-8 18 pen resistance
  • 14 int. resistance 1991, 42 in 1998
  • no difference in mortality
  • NS increased resistance with prior Abx use

24
Pen and Cephalosporin resistance
  • Silverstein
  • 11 year review 8 resistance
  • no diff in outcome, LOS in pen-resistant
  • Ceftriaxone-resistant more focal infection, more
    LPs, more febrile at F/U, more admitted (NS), ?
    HR and temp at presentation

25
Antibiotic resistant Pneumococcus in Calgary
  • 15 pen resistance
  • lt2 amoxicillin resistance
  • 10 Cefuroxime resistance
  • 3-4 Ceftriaxone resistance
  • need higher MIC for CNS
  • clinically, has not been an issue

26
Conjugate Pneumococcal Vaccine
  • heptavalent, 4 doses 2,4,6,12-15 mos
  • FDA approval Feb 2000 (Prevnar)
  • 3 RCTs of safety and immunogenicity
  • Rennels (1998)
  • Shinefield (1999)
  • Black (2000)
  • efficacy 97, intention-to-treat 94
  • including ALL S.pneumo serotypes 89
  • similar SE as DPTP/HIB, none severe

27
Pneumococcal Vaccine
  • significantly ? OM
  • Black ongoing trial on herd immunity
  • long-term efficacy?
  • strain selection?
  • Bottom line
  • will significantly decrease burden of S.pneumo
    disease
  • likely lag time to change practices

28
Impact Of Prevnar in N. California33,000 with
1 dose Feb 2000-Mar 2001
Shinefield et al. 3rd Intl PID Conference
Monterey, 2001
29
Pneumococcal VaccineCost Effectiveness
  • Lieu (JAMA 2000)
  • cost lt savings if each dose lt46 (US)
  • present 56 (US) 278,000/life-yr saved
  • gt2x savings for society vs. health payer
  • ? 760 million/3.8M infants/yr in US
  • most from parental work loss, ? productivity
  • Calgary 110/dose (84 at ACH)
  • current immunization budget 17M/yr
  • cost of SP vaccine 13M/yr

30
Occult Bacteremia Summary
  • age, temp, appearance important
  • dont forget U/A
  • save labs for unwell
  • faster BC techniques in distant future
  • F/U most important tool
  • empiric Abx have very limited role
  • no clear evidence favouring parenteral

31
Occult Bacteremia Summary II
  • antibiotic-resistance is rising impact small in
    Calgary
  • vaccine WILL change the face of FWS
  • Its viral!
  • until then, the controversy continues!
  • Are you a risk-minimizer or test-minimizer?
  • (Green, Rothrock. Annals Emerg Med. 1999)

32
Case revisited
  • WBC 14.9
  • ANC 8.3
  • BC ve S.pneumo in 24hr (pen I)
  • R/A looks well, T 38.5
  • Mgt?

33
Case cont.
  • Ceftriaxone IV
  • F/U ID clinic
  • well-looking
  • Ctx IV x 3 days, then Amoxil x 7 days

34
QUESTIONS?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com