Title: CISM Radiation Belt Models
1CISM Radiation Belt Models
CMIT
Mary Hudson CISM Seminar Nov 06
2Van Allen Radiation Belts
Slot region
outer belt
inner belt
3Van Allen Belts-Plasmasphere Overlap
Ring current
4Solar Cycle Dependence of 2-6 MeV Electrons
Li et al., GRL, 2006
5Van Allen Radiation Belts Slot region variability
Slot region
outer belt
inner belt
SAMPEX electrons 2 - 6 MeV
Outer belt
slot region L 2 - 3
inner belt
6Effect on the Radiation Belts
Baker et al., 2004, Nature
slot region
new belt
7(No Transcript)
8March 91 Shock Acceleration
3.5 MeV at L6.6, t0 (M 11,150 MeV/G)
Elkington et al., JASTP, 02 04
9MHD-Guiding Center Simulation
Elkington et al., JASTP, 2002 2004
10SAMPEX gt10 MeV Electron Injections
11SAMPEX Mar 91 decayFeb 94 injection
12Halloween 03 gt10 MeV Electron Injections
13Global LFM-MHD Simulations of Magnetosphere
- Solar wind measurements made WIND, ACE or IMP8
(Feb 94, not Mar 91)
- Ideal MHD equations are solved on a computational
grid to simulate the response of the
magnetosphere
141994 Feb 21 Event density
151994 Feb 21 Event Ephi
16Halloween 03 Shock Injection initial E 5 MeV,
R 6 RE, final E 15 MeV, R 2.5 RE
Kress et al., 06
17Halloween 03 Shock Injection of gt10 MeV (W01-7
MeV) Electrons
18E_phi (left) and Solar Energetic Electron
Trajectory (right)
Halloween 03 solar energetic electron injection
event Kress et al., 2006
19- Low altitude SAMPEX observations of gt 10 MeV
electrons, injected 10/29/03 - E-1.5 electron energy spectrum from several MeV
to gt 15 MeV - Initially not observed at SAMPEX due to eq
injection
Simulated pitch angle distribution-gt
20Outer Belt Losses Due to Whistler Pitch Angle
Scattering
outer belt
Whistler Mode
Hiss
2-6 MeV Slot Variability Lyons et al., 1972
21Losses due to Pitch Angle Scattering
EMIC waves from ring current ions
VLF waves from psheet electrons
22MHD Fields Injection of RadBelt Electrons
Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004
23MHD Fields Injection of RadBelt Electrons
Elkington et al., JASTP, 2004
24Diffusion Rates vs. L
- Radial diffusion rates in model ULF wave fields
- D_LL LN
- Perry et al., JGR, 05, includes dEf, dBr, dB//,
freq and L-dependent power
Radial diffusion rates in model ULF wave
fields D_LL LN Perry et al., JGR, 2005,
Include dEf, dBr, dB//, freq and L-dependence
3D trajectories N 6 for no L-dep power, N 12
with L dependence M273 MeV/G
Selesnick Blake 2000
Tau(L,E) Summers 04
Elkington et al., 2003
Braughtigam Albert, 2000, N6, 10 Perry et
al., 2006, N6, 12
25Solutions to diffusion equation using DLL from
model ULF wave fields and PSD from CRRES
measurements in subsequent 10-hr orbits to update
inner and outer boundaries
Perry et al. 2005 DLL10-2(L/4)12 day-1
Dashed lines show CRRES measurements of PSD 61
days apart. Loss model based on Summers et al.
2004.
26MHD-Driven Phase Space Density
Radial Diffusion
MHD-Test Particle
AE8 Max-Initialized, Sept 98 Storm
Fei et al., 2006
27New belt example 24 Nov 2001
Clear trapping of solar particles 13 of 26 SEP
penetration events inside L4, 98-03
Mazur et al., AGU Monograph 165, 2006
28(No Transcript)
29(No Transcript)
30Conclusions
- Drift time scale injection of multi- MeV
electrons Strong compression of dayside
magnetopause due to high speed CME - Relativistic electron seed population at and
beyond geosynchronous required - Plasmasphere plays role intensifying E_phi
- Long-lived, energetic trapped population injected
into slot region - Well-described by CMIT without coupled RCM
- Intermediate storm timescale (hrs,days) changes
in PSD described by radial diffusion loss due
to whistler (and EMIC) scattering - Enhanced D_LL due to ULF waves needs further
study with RCM coupled to CMIT, plasmasphere, ion
outflow to populate msphere during IMF Bzlt0
31 Drift Time Scale Injection from SSCs
Blake et al., 2005
32Mar 91-Feb 91Comparison