A Musical Data Mining Primer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

A Musical Data Mining Primer

Description:

A Musical Data Mining Primer CS235 Spring 03 Dan Berger dberger_at_cs.ucr.edu Outline Motivation/Problem Overview Background Types of Music Digital ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: danbe6
Learn more at: http://www.cs.ucr.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Musical Data Mining Primer


1
A Musical Data Mining Primer
  • CS235 Spring 03
  • Dan Berger
  • dberger_at_cs.ucr.edu

2
Outline
  • Motivation/Problem Overview
  • Background
  • Types of Music
  • Digital Representations
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Query (Content vs. Meta-Data)
  • Categorization Clustering
  • Finding More
  • Conclusion

3
Motivation
  • More music is being stored digitally
  • PressPlay offers 300,000 tracks for download
  • As collections grow organizing and searching
    manually become hard
  • How to find the right music in a sea of
    possibilities?
  • How to find new artists given current
    preferences?
  • How to find a song you heard on the radio?

4
Problem Overview
  • Music is a highly dimension time series
  • 5 minutes _at_ CD quality gt 13M samples!
  • It seems logical to apply data mining and IR
    techniques to this form of information.
  • Query, Clustering, Prediction, etc.
  • Application isnt straightforward for reasons
    well discuss shortly.

5
Background Types of Music
  • Monophonic one note sounds at a time.
  • Homophonic multiple note sound all starting
    (and ending) at the same instant.
  • Polyphonic no constraints on concurrency. Most
    general and difficult to handle.

6
Background Digital Representations
  • Structured (Symbolic)
  • MIDI stores note duration intensity,
    instructions for a synthesizer
  • Unstructured (Sampled)
  • PCM stores quantized periodic samples
  • Leverages Nyquist/Shannons sampling thm. to
    faithfully capture the signal.
  • MP3/Vorbis/AAC discards useless information
    reduces storage and fidelity
  • Use psychoacoustics
  • Some work at rediscovering musical structure.

7
Background Psychoacoustics
  • Two main relevant results
  • Limited, freq. dependant resolution
  • Auditory masking
  • We hear different frequencies differently
  • sound spectrum broken into critical bands
  • We miss signals due to spectral /or temporal
    collision.
  • Loud sounds mask softer ones,
  • Two sounds of similar frequency get blended

8
Query Content is King
  • Current systems use textual meta-data to
    facilitate query
  • Song/Album Title, Artist, Genre
  • The goal is to query by the musical content
  • Similarity
  • find songs like the current one
  • find songs with this musical phrase

9
Result Query By Humming
  • A handful of research systems have been built
    that locate songs in a collection based on the
    user humming or singing a melodic portion of the
    song.
  • Typically search over a collection of monophonic
    MIDI files.

10
Content Based Query
  • Recall music is a time series with high
    dimensionality.
  • Need robust dimensionality reduction.
  • Not all parts of music are equally important.
  • Feature extraction remember the important
    features.
  • Which features are important?

11
Similarity/Feature Extraction
  • The current hard problem there are ad-hoc
    solutions, but little supporting theory.
  • Tempo (bpm), volume, spectral qualities,
    transitions, etc.
  • Sound source is it a piano? a trumpet?
  • Singer recognition whos the vocalist?
  • Collectively Machine Listening
  • These are hard problems with some positive
    results.

12
Compression Complexity
  • Different compression schemes (MP3/Vorbis/AAC)
    use psychoacoustics differently.
  • Different implementations of a scheme may also!
  • Feature extraction needs to be robust to these
    variations.
  • Seems to be an open problem.

13
Categorization/Clustering
  • Genre (rock/rB/pop/jazz/blues/etc.) is manually
    assigned and subjective.
  • Work is being done on automatic classification
    and clustering.
  • Relies on (and sometimes reinvents) the
    similarity metric work described previously.

14
Browsing Visualization
  • LOUD
  • physical
  • exploration
  • Islands of Music uses self organizing maps to
    visualize clusters of similar songs.

15
Current Efforts
  • Amazon/iTunes/etc. use collaborative filtering.
  • If the population is myopic and predictable, it
    works well, otherwise not.
  • Hit Song Science clusters a provided set of
    songs against a database of top 30 hits to
    predict success.
  • Claims to have predicted the success of Nora
    Jones.
  • Relatable musical fingerprint technology
    involved with Napster 2

16
Finding More
  • Conferences
  • Int. Symposium on Music IR (ISMIR)
  • Int. Conference on Music and AI (ICMAI)
  • Joint Conference on Digital Libraries
  • Journals
  • ACM/IEEE Multimedia
  • Groups
  • MIT Media Lab Machine Listening Group

17
Conclusion
  • Slow steady progress is being made.
  • Music Appreciation is fuzzy
  • we cant define it but we know it when we hear
    it.
  • References, and more detail, are in my survey
    paper, available shortly on the web.
  • http//www.cs.ucr.edu/dberger

18
Fini
  • Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com