Getting funded - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Getting funded

Description:

Getting funded Scientific focus Writing a grant: do s and don ts Where and when to apply The review process Budgeting Scientific focus State a specific over ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: medicineM8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Getting funded


1
Getting funded
  • Scientific focus
  • Writing a grant dos and donts
  • Where and when to apply
  • The review process
  • Budgeting

2
Scientific focus
  • State a specific over-arching hypothesis and
    Specific Aims that are testable and important
  • Stay away from the trivial
  • Balance between the do-able and the overly
    ambitious
  • Pick an important problem advice for your
    scientific life
  • Focus on the problem, not the method
  • Not we will use a newly-developed mouse to test
    this idea but we will test this idea. One
    approach is to use a newly-developed mouse

3
  • He chose poorly

4
What goes into a grant?
  • The science
  • Specific aims
  • Background and significance
  • Preliminary data
  • Methods
  • Other stuff that might influence a score
  • The investigator
  • The environment
  • Stuff that doesnt usually influence a score
  • The budget

5
Some grant writing dos and donts
  • Reviewers are not infinitely patient.
  • Make your case on page 1 abstract, Specific Aims
    Page
  • Make it clearly
  • Make it legibly
  • Spell-check
  • Learn to like to write
  • Finish the first draft weeks ahead of time
  • Time for you to re-review (pretend you didnt
    write it)
  • Time for your mentor and other colleagues to
    review
  • Daily (at least!) backups use dropbox or
    something like it

6
Grant writing dos and donts
  • By the time a reviewer gets to a description of
    what you propose to do, they should already be
    convinced that
  • the problem is important.
  • Dont characterize, describe, etc. Rather,
    test hypothesis, identify, determine the
    role of
  • Avoid elevator science A and C go up B and D go
    down
  • the experiments are do-able
  • you can do them

7
Some specifics
  • Writing the Specific Aims section
  • Background and significance
  • Dont review everything there is to know review
    what is important to your proposal, introduce new
    methods. Self-citation is OK in moderation here.
  • Preliminary data
  • They know what you want to do. Convince them you
    can do it.
  • As soon as you think you are going to write a
    grant, think about what preliminary data you will
    need. Dont leave this for later
  • Methods
  • My preference describe the experiments,
    pitfalls, interpretation that will address each
    Specific Aim put the details in a separate
    section at the end.

8
Form issues
  • The Figure 1 Strategy
  • Fonts and figures
  • Every paragraph should have a header

9
5 sentences describe the preliminary data and the
question to be addressed in Specific Aim 1
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
If you are the reviewer, what word might you use
to describe the likelihood this grant will get
funded?
14
  • Inconceivable!
  • I dont think that word means what you think it
    means

15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
A picture is worth more than a thousand words
its worth hundreds of thousands or millions of
dollars
18
A visual issue in graphics generation
19
A visual issue in graphics generation
20
The review process
  • Imperfect
  • Usually impersonal
  • Participate on grant review committees if the
    opportunity arises
  • Find out who will review your grant. Cite them
    (moderately) in the text.

21
A bad attitude to the review process
  • Leave the gun bring the cannoli

22
NIH Review Criteria
  • Significance
  • Approach
  • Innovation
  • Environment
  • Investigator
  • Importance of each component varies during career
    development
  • An unfunded grant is a re-submittable grant
  • Also, thanks to the miracles of modern
    word-processing, a written grant need not be
    submitted to only one funding agency.

23
  • It's not spaghetti, it's linguini
  • Now it's garbage.

Throw enough linguini against the wall, and some
of it will stick
24
Timetables
  • At the end of the Methods section
  • Reviewers will pillory you for not presenting
    them
  • They are near-meaningless, in my opinion.

25
Conclusions
  • Successful grant competition requires attention
    to form and to content. Both need to be
    excellent.
  • Variety of opportunities for support for young
    investigators.
  • While review process is similar for all agencies,
    application details and eligibility vary
  • I cant believe they pay me to do this.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com