Title: Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray spectroscopy
1Studying AGN with high-resolution X-ray
spectroscopy
- Jelle Kaastra
- SRON
- Nahum Arav, Ehud Behar, Stefano Bianchi, Josh
Bloom, Alex Blustin, Graziella Branduardi-Raymont,
Massimo Cappi, Elisa Costantini, Mauro Dadina,
Rob Detmers, Jacobo Ebrero, Peter Jonker, Chris
Klein, Jerry Kriss, Piotr Lubinski, Julien
Malzac, Missagh Mehdipour, Stéphane Paltani,
Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, Ciro Pinto, Gabriele
Ponti, Eva Ratti, Katrien Steenbrugge, Cor de
Vries
2IntroductionThe influence of AGN outflows
- Dispersal heavy elements into IGM ICM
- Ionisation structure IGM
- ??evolution host galaxy
- How created? Structure? Mass energy?
Confinement? - Crucial to understanding central engine
- Accretion process
- Energy budget
3AGN outflows in a nutshell
- Photo-ionised gas
- v -100 to -1000 km/s
- Seen through line and continuum absorption
- Spectrum ? ionic column densities ? ionization
parameter ?L/nr²
4Photoionisation modelling
- Radiation impacts a volume (layer) of gas
- Different interactions of photons with atoms
cause ionisation, recombination, heating
cooling - In equilibrium, ionisation state of the plasma
determined by - spectral energy distribution incoming radiation
- chemical abundances
- ionisation parameter ?L/nr2 with L ionising
luminosity, n density and r distance from
ionising source ? essentially ratio photon
density / gas density
5Question 1Structure outflow
- Is it more like rather uniform density clouds in
pressure equilibrium? - Or is it more like coronal streamers, with
lateral density stratification?
6Absorption measure distribution
Discrete components
Emission measure Column density
Continuous distribution
Ionisation parameter ?
Temperature
7Separate components in pressure equilibrium?
- Not all components in press. eq. (same ?)
- Division into ? comps often poorly defined
- ? Continuous NH(?) distribution?
- Others fit discrete components
- What's going on?
Steenbrugge et al. 2005
8Question 2 Where is the gas?
- Photo-ionization modeling ? ?L/nr²
- L obtained from spectrum
- ? only the product nr² known, not r or n
- Is gas accelerating, decelerating?
9Density estimates line ratios
- C III has absorption lines near 1175 Ã… from
metastable level - Combined with absorption line from ground (977 Ã…)
this yields n - ? n 3x104 cm-3 in NGC 3783 (Gabel et al. 2004)
? r1 pc - Only applies for some sources, low ? gas
- X-rays have similar lines, but sensitive to
higher n (e.g. O V, Kaastra et al. 2004) no
convincing case yet
10Density estimates reverberation
- If L increases for gas at fixed n and r, then
?L/nr² increases - ? change in ionisation balance
- ? column density changes
- ? transmission changes
- Gas has finite ionisation/recombination time tr
(density dependent as 1/n) - ? measuring delayed response yields tr?n?r
11Reverberation NGC 3783
- RGS data (Behar et al. 2003) no change in
- Warm absorber ? nlt300 cm-3, rgt10 pc.
- EPIC data (Reeves et al. 2003) change in
- Warm absorber (larger columns) ? ngt108 cm-3,
rlt0.02 pc.
12Observation campaign Mrk 509
- Core 10 x 60 ks XMM, spaced 4 days (RGS, EPIC
OM all used!) - Simultaneous Integral 10 x 120 ks
- Followed by 180 ks Chandra LETGS, simultaneous
with 10 orbits COS (HST) - Preceded with Swift (UVOT, XRT) monitoring
- Supplemented with ground-based (WHT, Pairitel)
photometry grism - Period 4 Sept 13 Dec 2009 (100 days)
- 7 papers submitted/accepted, 8 in progress
13General data analysis issues
- Excellent quality ? many new steps developed
- RGS full usage multi-pointing mode, refinements
combining spectra with variable hot pixels,
?-scale, effective area, reducing response 2Gb?8
Mb, rebinning) See Kaastra et al. 2011 see
auxilary programs in SPEX distribution
www.sron.nl/spex - PN Triggered by our campaign improved gain cal
- OM extended wavelength range optical grism
- HST/COS extensive efforts to improve data
analysis for this high-quality spectrum - SPEX allows simultaneous fitting high-res UV
X-ray spectra
14Broad-band spectrum variability(Mehdipour et
al., Petrucci et al., talks this afternoon)
15Fe-K line variability(Ponti et al. talk
Petrucci et al.)
Line Intensity
- Broad and neutral Fe K emission well correlated
with continuum emission on few days time-scales. - No relativistic profile
- Origin outer disc or inner BLR
-
3-10 keV flux
.
16OM Grism spectrum
17UV-optical variability(OM, Swift)
- Source was in outburst (0.1 dex in UV) right in
the middle of ourt campaign!
18ISM absorption(talk Pinto et al. on Monday)
19Abundances(Steenbrugge et al., poster G45)
20COS FUSE UV Absorption lines in Mrk 509(Kriss
et al., talk this afternoon)
- O VI,Lyß, Ly? from FUSE (Kriss et al. 2000)
- 14 velocity components seen in COS UV spectrum
- C IV doublet split by only 500 km/s, so grey
regions cant be used for optical-depth - Red lines velocities X-ray absorbers
XMM-Newton/RGS - Blue lines velocities X-ray absorbers
Chandra/LETGS
21LETGS COS data(Ebrero et al., poster G14)
- X-rays outflow with 3 distinct ionization phases
in form of multi-velocity wind. UV spectra
absorption system with 13 kinematic components - Analysis kinematic properties column densities
absorbers ? UV-absorbing gas co-located with
embedded in lower density high-ionization X-ray
absorbing gas
22Stacked RGS spectrum
- Galactic O I edge
- Several narrow absorption lines
- Detection 31 individual ions
- Tight upper limits column densities 18 other ions
- Two main velocity components (40 and -300 km/s)
- Highly ionised ions in general higher velocity
23No O I from host galaxy
O I host galaxy (not detected, NHlt5x1018 cm-2)
24X-ray analysis in more detail
- Fit spectra using a power law modified
blackbody (or even a spline) continuum - Where needed, add emission lines BLR or NLR
X-ray lines (no relativistic lines needed) - Fit warm absorber using a model ? ionic or total
column densities - Using photo-ionisation model, derive absorption
measure distribution NH(?) - Spectral fits done with SPEX, global fits
25Sample high-resolution spectra
26Example of broad emission lines
O VIII Lya
O VII triplet
27Photoionisation modelling RGS spectrum(Detmers
et al. 2011)
Mehdipour et al. 2011
- Use time-averaged SED
- Test dependence on SED
- Proto-solar abundances
- Multiple ionisation, 3 velocity components
- Same ion may be present in more than one
velocity/ionisation component!
28Discrete versus continuous absorption measure
distribution?
- Column densities well approximated by sum of 5
components (see table) - Higher column for higher ionisation parameter
- But what about a continuous model?
E
D
C
A
B
29Continuous model
- Fitted columns with continuous (spline) model
- Surprise comps C D pop-up as discrete
components! - Upper limits FWHM 35 80
- Component B ( A) too poor statistics to prove if
continuous - Component E also poorer determined correlation ?
and NH.
D
E
C
B
30Where is the gas?
- Needs t-dependent model
- For each of the 5 components if L increases, ?
must increase (as ?L/nr2) - From 10 continuum model fits ? predicted ? change
for each of 10 observations, compared to average
spectrum - If gas responds immediately, transmission outflow
changes immediately
31Expected response absorbers for 0.1 dex
luminosity increase
32Time-dependent photo-ionisation
- Time evolution ion concentrations ni
- dni/dt Aij(t) nj
- Aij(t) contains t-dependent ionisation
recombination rates
33Location photoionised gas(work in progress)
- Component A Rotating, low ionisation disk high
velocity outflow, 3 kpc (direct imaging O III
5007, Philips 1986) - Component C gt10 pc (lack of response)
- Component E gt 1 pc? (lack of response?)
- See also Kriss (talk this afternoon) and poster
Ebrero
34Mass loss through the wind
v (km/s) -100 -1000
?1 0.001 0.0001
?1000 1.0 0.1
35Conclusions
- Deep, multi-wavelength monitoring campaigns (AGN)
are rewarding - High quality spectra, not limited by statistics
- Continuous light curves, allowing to monitor
the variations