US Risk in a Global Setting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

US Risk in a Global Setting

Description:

WHU Campus for Finance Rationality of Stock Markets and Empirical Finance January 2003 Rational International Investment Campbell R. Harvey, Ph.D., – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:125
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 76
Provided by: FuquaScho88
Learn more at: https://people.duke.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: US Risk in a Global Setting


1
WHU Campus for Finance Rationality of Stock
Markets and Empirical Finance January 2003
Rational International Investment
Campbell R. Harvey, Ph.D., Professor, Duke
University http//www.duke.edu/charvey
2
The Plan
  • Returns, diversification and predictability
  • Long horizon vs. short horizon
  • Expected performance
  • Prospect theory or skewness preference?
  • Importance of GPRs
  • The stock markets play a role in the world
    economy

3
The International Track Record
International Performance
Wilshire Mid Cap
Thirty Year Treasury STRIP
Twenty Year Treasury STRIP
Wilshire Large Cap
Wilshire 5000
Ten Year Treasury STRIP
Wilshire Small Cap
EAFE X-Japan
Seven Year Treasury STRIP
Credit
MBS
Five Year Treasury STRIP
Aggregate
Government
EAFE
Germany
Three Year Treasury STRIP
Two Year STRIP
One Year Treasury STRIP
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
4
Returns and Diversification
Data from MSCI
5
Returns and Diversification
Data from IFC
6
Returns and Diversification
Data from MSCI
7
Returns and Diversification
Data from MSCI
8
Returns and Diversification
Data from MSCI
9
Returns and Diversification
Data from MSCI
10
Returns and Diversification
Data from IFC
11
US Business Cycle is Predictable
US Yield Curve Inverts Before Last Six US
Recessions(5-year US Treasury bond - 3-month US
Treasury bill)
Annual GDP growth or Yield Curve
Real annual GDP growth
Yield curve
Recession Correct
Recession Correct
Yield curve accurate in recent forecast
Recession Correct
2 Recessions Correct
Data though 1/12/03
12
Returns and Diversification
Data from IFC and MSCI
13
Returns and Diversification
Acrobat Document
Source Goetzmann, Li and Rouwenhorst (2002)
14
Returns and Diversification
Acrobat Document
Source Goetzmann, Li and Rouwenhorst (2002)
15
The Long Horizon
Data from Dimson, Marsh and Stauton (2002)
16
The Long Horizon
Data from Dimson, Marsh and Stauton (2002)
17
The Long Horizon
Data from Dimson, Marsh and Stauton (2002)
18
The Long Horizon
Data from Dimson, Marsh and Stauton (2002)
19
What to Expect
Data from Dimson, Marsh and Stauton (2002)
20
What to Expect
Data from MSCI. Japan divided by 10.
21
What to Expect
Price to Trailing Peak Earnings vs 5 Year Average
CPI
(overlapping annual data)
Price to Trailing Peak Earnings
Source Bloomberg, Standard Poors
Source Goldman Sachs (2002)
22
What to Expect
  • Ten-year risk premium around 3.5 and stable
    whereas one-year risk premium quite variable

10-year premium
1-year premium
Source Graham and Harvey (2003)
23
What to Expect
U.S. Equity and Bond Returns are Positively
Correlated
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
24
What to Expect
World Real Equity and Real Bond Returns are
Positively Correlated
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
25
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real US Bill
Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
26
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real US
Intermediate Bond Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
27
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real US Bond
Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
28
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real US Equity
Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
29
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real
International Bill Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
30
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real
International Bill Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
31
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real
International Equity Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
32
What to Expect
Inflation Negatively Related to Real
International Equity Returns
Source Erb and Harvey (2002)
33
Rethinking Risk
  • Traditional models maximize expected returns for
    some level of volatility
  • Is volatility a complete measure of risk?

34
Rethinking Risk
  • Much interest in prospect theory, downside risk,
    asymmetric volatility, semi-variance, extreme
    value analysis, regime-switching, jump processes,
    ...

35
Rethinking Risk
  • In prospect theory (Kahneman and Tversky)
  • Investor risk averse in the case of gains, as a
    small certain gain is preferred to a probable
    risky gain
  • Investor risk seeking in the case of losses, as a
    probable risky loss is preferred to a small
    certain loss
  • So investors do not evaluate outcomes based on
    true probabilities

36
Rethinking Risk
  • Loss aversion is a special case
  • Investor has a greater incremental utility
    penalty for losses than for an equally large gain
  • Overall, investor looks risk averse

37
Rethinking Risk
  • But, perhaps we can think of these situations in
    terms of preference for higher moments
  • Most asset allocation work operates in two
    dimensions mean and variance -- but skew is
    important for investors.
  • Examples

38
Rethinking Risk
  • 1. The 1 lottery ticket. The expected value is
    0.45 (hence a -55) expected return.
  • Why is price so high?
  • Lottery delivers positive skew, people like
    positive skew and are willing to pay a premium

39
Rethinking Risk
  • 2. High implied vol in out of the money OEX put
    options.
  • Why is price so high?
  • Option limits downside (reduces negative skew).
  • Investors are willing to pay a premium for assets
    that reduce negative skew
  • Is this loss aversion or skewness preference?

40
Rethinking Risk
  • 3. Some stocks that trade with seemingly too
    high P/E multiples
  • Why is price so high?
  • Enormous upside potential (some of which is not
    well understood)
  • Investors are willing to pay a premium for assets
    that produce positive skew
  • Note Expected returns could be small or
    negative!

41
Rethinking Risk
Source Harvey and Siddique (2000)
42
Rethinking Risk
Data from MSCI
43
Rethinking Risk
Data from IFC
44
Rethinking Risk
Data from MSCI
45
Rethinking Risk
Data from IFC
46
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
Source Agarwal and Naik (2002)
47
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
Source Agarwal and Naik (2002)
48
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
Source Agarwal and Naik (2002)
49
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
Source Agarwal and Naik (2002)
50
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
Source Figure 5 from Mitchell Pulvino (2000)
51
Alternative Vehicles
Alternate Asset Classes Often Involve Implicit or
Explicit Options
6
4
2
0
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
Event Driven Index Returns
-2
-4
LOWESS fit
-6
-8
Russell 3000 Index Returns
Source Agarwal and Naik (2002)
52
Rethinking Risk
Skewness has potential to explain one of the
unsolved anomalies in finance the profitability
of momentum trading
Momentum portfolios
53
Rethinking Risk
  • Harvey, Liechty, Liechty and Müller (2002)
    Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments provide
    a new approach to portfolio selection which
    accounts for
  • Higher moments
  • Estimation errors in the inputs

54
The Evolution of World Risk
  • The U.S. has become much more risky
  • High sensitivity to some GPRs
  • Disagreement on strength of economy
  • Financial information less credible

55
The Evolution of World Risk
ICRG Political Risk
Data from PRS
56
The Evolution of World Risk
ICRG Political Risk
Data from PRS
57
The Evolution of World Risk
ICRG Political Risk
Data from PRS
58
The Evolution of World Risk
Risk Ratings December 2002
Data from PRS
59
The Evolution of World Risk
Risk Ratings May 2001
Data from PRS
60
The Evolution of World Risk
Higher risk means equity investors require a
higher rate of return
Risk Ratings from Institutional Investor
61
The Evolution of World Risk
  • Equation implies an increase in the medium-term
    risk premium
  • This helps explain the recent decline in the
    equity market
  • This helps explain the recent behavior of the
    U.S. dollar
  • This helps explain the slow down in real
    investment (hurdle rates are up)

62
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • Efficiently functioning stock markets make a
    difference in the real economy
  • There is now substantial cross-country evidence
    on the impact of stock market development on the
    real economy

63
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • Market integration has a fundamental influence on
    asset prices

64
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
Asset Prices and Market Integration
Prices
Segmented
Integrated
PI
PS
Return to Integration
Time
High Expected Announcement
Implementation Low Expected Returns
of Liberalization
Returns
65
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
Average Annual Geometric Returns
66
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
Correlation with World
67
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • Implications
  • Lower cost of capital
  • More investment, employment
  • More economic growth
  • Geert Bekaert, Campbell Harvey and Chris
    Lundblad, Does Financial Liberalization Spur
    Growth?
  • Not just an emerging markets effect Euro also
    increased integration

68
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • Findings
  • Liberalization increases real growth by 1 per
    year for five years which is a large number
  • The liberalization effect is robust to
  • different definitions of liberalization dates
  • to business cycle or interest rate controls
  • allowing for intensity of liberalization
  • ...and independent of capital account
    liberalization

69
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • Findings
  • We control
  • macroeconomic reforms
  • financial development
  • other regulatory reforms
  • ...and effect is intact

70
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • But is there a cost?
  • Foreign speculators
  • Economic crises
  • Irrational contagion

71
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • But is there a cost?
  • Liberalization may lead to hot speculative
    capital and induce capital flight (Stiglitz
    others)
  • One can always point to a particular country to
    support this idea
  • What about looking at a broad cross section?

72
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
  • But is there a cost?
  • Geert Bekaert, Campbell Harvey and Chris
    Lundblad, Growth Volatility and Equity Market
    Liberalization, 2002.
  • No evidence that GDP growth volatility increases
    after markets open up

73
Stock Markets and the Real Economy
74
Conclusions
  • Predictability arises naturally from business
    cycle fluctuations it need not be confused with
    irrationality
  • While the research is very important, the case
    has not yet been made for widespread application
    of behavioral models
  • Stock markets, in general, play a positive role
    not just for investors and corporations but the
    economy

75
Readings
  • My articles on www.duke.edu/charvey
  • The Drivers of Expected Returns in International
    Markets (2000)
  • Global Tactical Asset Allocation (2001) with
    Magnus Dahlquist
  • The Term Structure of Equity Risk Premia (2002)
    with Claude Erb
  • Characterizing Systematic Risk of Hedge Funds
    with Buy-and-Hold and Option-Based Strategies,
    (2002) Vikas Agarwal and Naranyan Y. Naik
  • Portfolio Selection with Higher Moments, with
    John Liechty, Merrill Liechty, and Peter Müller
  • Does Financial Liberalization Spur Growth? with
    Geert Bekaert, and Chris Lundblad
  • Growth Volatility and Equity Market
    Liberalization with Geert Bekaert, and Chris
    Lundblad
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com