Title: Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing
1Hydrogen Embrittlement Testing
- HCAT Program Review
- Cocoa Beach, Fl
- December 2000
2Sequence 1 - Make sure that HVOFdoes not cause
embrittlement
Coat, no grind
- ASTM F-519, Type 1a.2
- 75 NTS
- All experience shows HVOF does not cause
embrittlement - Just makes sure
3Sequence 2 - can H from other plating or
stripping escape through HVOF?
1. Bright Cd plate
2. Strip center - no bake
H2 fill
3. Coat within 4 hrs, no grind
Does H2 escape?
- 75 NTS
- Using bright Cd so as to avoid excessive diameter
and inability to hold in grips - No way for H to escape at center except through
HVOF
4Sequence 3 - How does environmental embrittlement
compare with Cr?
Coat
Expose small area in notch
expose
- 45 NTS
- Solutions - H2O and 5 NaCl
- Exposed notch should corrode and release H
5Exposure of bare surface for Sequence 3
- Exposure of notch - 90? sector
- CNC machine using rounded edge blade (RBK,
Seattle)
Blade
Sample
6Hydrogen embrittlement
- Samples produced by Southwest Aeroservice (Jim
Nuse, Dave Sommerville) - Sequences 1 and 2 work by Metcut (Phil Bretz)
- Sequence 3 by Boeing (Dennis Dull)
7Base material
- Expected NTS 260 ksi
- Tested at 362,416 to 382,521, average 373,600
ksi - Sequence 1 and 2 testing at 280.2 ksi
- Rockwell hardness
8Coating deposition
- Chrome penetrates into notch
- thinner at notch bottom
- HVOF deposits best by angling gun and blowing
excess powder away with strong jet - thicker at bottom
Chrome
HVOF 31?
9Embrittlement - summary
- Table shows hours to failure (passgt200)
- Sequence 1
- Col 3 currently under test
- originals not baked
- Sequence 2
- Uncoated samples currently under test - no
baseline yet - originals not H-loaded
- Sequence 3 testing begun - uncoated baseline in
test - Blue samples at Boeing for metallography
10Embrittlement - Sequence 1, not baked
- Sequence 1
- Unbaked Seq 1 show HVOF does not cause
embrittlement - Baked baseline (0.003 and 0.010 Cr only)
currently under test - Two Cr samples at Boeing for metallography to
check failure mode
11Embrittlement - Sequence 2, not baked
- No immediate failures
- Need to acquire uncoated baseline
- Baking removes most H2
- Not completely removed in WC-Co
- One immediate failure WC-CoCr 0.010
- Being analyzed at Boeing
12Embrittlement - Conclusions
- Sequence 1
- HVOF does not cause embrittlement
- Baked chrome baseline being acquired
- Sequence 3
- In progress
- Sequence 2
- Failure not immediate without bake
- Need baseline comparison
- Some H2 removal by flame?
- Reduced Kt?
- Bake removes H2 from most samples
- Except WC-Co 0.003 - why?
- Immediate fail WC-Co 0.010 being examined at
Boeing - Baseline uncoated (i.e. coated and stripped)
being acquired