Teaching Source Credibility and Bias - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Teaching Source Credibility and Bias

Description:

Teaching Source Credibility and Bias Standard 6.8 Evaluating Sources Essential question What do my students need to evaluate when choosing sources for their ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:127
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: greenvill6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teaching Source Credibility and Bias


1
Teaching Source Credibility and Bias
  • Standard 6.8 Evaluating Sources

2
Essential question
  • What do my students need to evaluate when
    choosing sources for their research projects?

3
Research Assignment
  • This year you will write a research paper that
    involves literary analysis.
  • We will begin research this month, and you need
    to know how to choose good sources.

4
Primary or Secondary
  • Primary Sources Literary works (poems, short
    stories, novels, essays, plays) documents,
    autobiographies letters interviews speeches
    surveys tables of statistics
  • Secondary Sources Comment on or analysis of an
    original text biographies

5
Primary Sources
  • Credibility is not an issue
  • WHY?
  • Bias, however, may need to be a consideration
  • WHY?

6
Secondary Sources
  • Evaluation of these sources is essential
  • Credibility of authorship, authenticity,
    accuracy, and bias may be an issue

7
Evaluating the source
  • Usefulness
  • Credibility
  • Bias

8
Usefulness
  • Your purpose What will this source add to your
    research project? Will it help support a major
    point, demonstrate you have researched
    thoroughly, or help establish your own
    credibility as a conscientious researcher?

9
Is It CRAP?
  • Currency
  • How recent is the information?
  • How recently has the website been updated?
  • Is it current enough for your topic?
  • Reliability
  • What kind of information is included in the
    resource?
  • Is content of the resource primarily opinion? Is
    is balanced?
  • Does the creator provide references or sources
    for data or quotations?
  • Authority
  • Who is the creator or author?
  • What are the credentials?
  • Who is the published or sponsor?
  • Are they reputable?
  • What is the publishers interest (if any) in this
    information?
  • Are there advertisements on the website?
  • Purpose/Point of View
  • Is this fact or opinion?
  • the creator/author trying to sell you something?
  • Is it biased?

10
Usefulness
  • Relevance Is the source relevant to your
    project, or are you simply listing sources to
    meet a quota?

11
Usefulness
  • Level of specialization General sources can be
    helpful when you are beginning your research, but
    you may need more specialized or more current
    resources. Ask yourself, Who was this source
    written for? A general audience? A more
    specialized group? How does this resource fit
    with your audience and purpose.

12
Credibility
  • Credentials of the publisher or sponsor What can
    you learn about the newspaper or sponsor of the
    source? For example, is it a newspaper known for
    integrity or is it a tabloid? Is it a popular
    source, or is it sponsored by a professional
    organization or academic institution? Is the
    book published by a company you recognize or can
    locate easily on the web?

13
Credibility
  • Credentials of the author An authors
    credentials often are included on the back cover
    or flap covers of the book. When researching,
    does the authors name come up in other sources?
    He may be influential in his field

14
Credibility
  • Date of the publication Recent publication dates
    may be more useful in the sciences or other
    fields where change is frequent and current
    information is essential. However, in the
    Humanities, the most authoritative works may be
    the oldest. Publications dates on the web are
    difficult to assess, which explains why MLA
    suggests recording the date you accessed the
    information instead of a publication date.

15
Credibility
  • Accuracy of the source Can you locate other
    sources that corroborate this source? In other
    words, can you find other sources that have
    similar information or support parts of what you
    find in this source?

16
Credibility
  • Cross-references to the source Is the source
    cited in other works? If you see the source cited
    other places, notice what another author says
    about the source. Anothers comments may give
    you insight into the credibility.

17
Bias
  • Stance of the source Its important to identify
    the sources point of view (bias). Would the
    author have a reason to slant the information?
    Omit essential facts or details? Identifying the
    source is the first step toward evaluating
    whether the sources bias would be a concern.
    For instance, would the source be trying to
    convince you of an idea? Sell something? Call
    you to action? Do any of those purposes call the
    information in the source into question?

18
What is bias?
  • According to Webster's Dictionary online
  • Bias is defined as
  • an inclination of temperament or outlook
    especially a personal and sometimes unreasoned
    judgment PREJUDICE

19
Looking for bias
  • In Politics
  • Rush Limbaugh, Radio Talk Show Host
  • Example Proclaimed right wing republican uses
    his talk show to promote his party's platform
    beliefs

20
Looking for bias
  • In SELF-PROMOTERS Authors of books, websites, or
    various written works promote their works for
    self-gratification.
  • Example Toyota Today Magazine rating its Toyota
    cars as the best in its class based on some
    specifications outlined by them.

21
Looking for bias
  • In FINANCE A individual or company creates
    website to advertise a product or service.
  • Example Receiving Tax Tips from a website
    designed and maintained by HR Block.

22
Looking for bias
  • From SPONSORS An individual or company supports
    a website with the intention of gaining exposure.
  • Example Gaining interview and resume writing
    tips from a website sponsored by Kelly  and
    Manpower Temporary Services.com

23
Red Flags for source credibility
  • Anonymity no author or sponsoring entity
  • Negative reviews by other sources
  • Misspelled words and poor grammar
  • Vague or sweeping generalizations
  • One-sided viewpoint that does not address an
    opposing side

24
Red Flags
  • Intemperate tone or language ("stupid jerks,"
    "shrill cries of my extremist opponents") 
  • Overclaims ("Thousands of children are murdered
    every day in the United States.") 
  • Sweeping statements of excessive significance
    ("This is the most important idea ever
    conceived!") 
  • Conflict of Interest ("Welcome to the Old Stogie
    Tobacco Company Home Page. To read our report,
    'Cigarettes Make You Live Longer,' click here."
    or "The products our competitors make are
    dangerous and bad for your health.")

25
Red Flags
  • Numbers or statistics presented without an
    identified source for them 
  • Absence of source documentation when the
    discussion clearly needs such documentation 
  • You cannot find any other sources that present
    the same information or acknowledge that the same
    information exists (lack of corroboration)

26
Cues from URLs
  • edu educational institution http//docsouth.unc.
    edu.
  • gov US government site http//memory.loc.gov.
  • org organization or association
    http//www.theaha.org.
  • com commercial site http//www.historychannel.co
    m.
  • museum museum http//nc.history.museum.
  • net personal or other site http//www.california
    history.net

27
Choosing a resource
  • Your topic is acid rain and its effect on
    automobile paint. Would you be more likely to
    find relevant information in
  • A brochure advertising Fords newest Green
    models
  • A National Geographic article on changing weather
    patterns
  • A study conducted by BMW on exterior paint for
    cars
  • ICAR research on automobile safety in hurricane
    force wind and rain

28
Answer
  • The correct answer is C because it specifically
    refers to automobile exterior paint.
  • All of the other sources listed do not refer to
    automobile paint. They may deal with rain but
    nothing indicates they refer to acid rain.
    Therefore,

29
Which website?
  • For a research paper on the history of the sport
    of lacrosse, which website will be the most
    relevant and reliable?
  • www.lacrosse.com (home page of the Great Atlantic
    Lacrosse Company, which sells lacrosse equipment)
  • www.lacrosse.org (home page of US Lacrosse, the
    governing body over men and womens lacrosse
    teams in the US)
  • www.lacrosseuniversity.com (website of Lacrosse
    University in Bay St. Louis, MS)
  • www.warriorlacrosse.com (website of
    manufacturer of lacrosse equipment

30
Answer
  • The correct answer is B. Option A and D both
    represent retail companies who sell sporting
    equipment. Their websites would be unlikely to
    have much information about the history of the
    sport. Option C is a link to a university.
    Option B is a link to an organization that
    oversees the development and rules of the sport,
    thus they would be more likely to have
    information about the history of the sport.

31
Assess the source
  • Rank each of these websites from 1(low) to 4
    (high) according to how reliable and accurate you
    think they would be
  • The most recent U.S. Department of Labor
    statistics on unemployment
  • Twelfth-graders blog on the history of silent
    films
  • Wikipedia article about a controversial political
    issue
  • An editorial about Abraham Lincoln from the New
    York Times, January 1862

32
Support your ranking
  • Explain your reasons for ranking each website to
    a partner.
  • Did you and your partner agree on the rankings?

33
Sources
  • Harris, Robert. Evaluating Internet Sources.
    Virtual Salt. June 15, 2007. January 12, 2010.
    http//www.virtualsalt.com/evalu8it.htm. Web.
  • Lunsford, Andrea A. The Everyday Writer Fourth
    Edition. Boston
  • Bedford- St. Martins Press, 2009.
    170-171. Print
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com