Modeling Crowd Dynamics Brent Morgan1, 2, Krista Parry1, 3, Andy Platta1, 3, Mitch Wilson1, 4 1Mathematics, 2Engineering Physics, 3Chemistry, 4Mechanical Engineering - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

Modeling Crowd Dynamics Brent Morgan1, 2, Krista Parry1, 3, Andy Platta1, 3, Mitch Wilson1, 4 1Mathematics, 2Engineering Physics, 3Chemistry, 4Mechanical Engineering

Description:

Modeling Crowd Dynamics Brent Morgan1, 2, Krista Parry1, 3, Andy Platta1, 3, Mitch Wilson1, 4 1Mathematics, 2Engineering Physics, 3Chemistry, 4Mechanical Engineering – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modeling Crowd Dynamics Brent Morgan1, 2, Krista Parry1, 3, Andy Platta1, 3, Mitch Wilson1, 4 1Mathematics, 2Engineering Physics, 3Chemistry, 4Mechanical Engineering


1
Modeling Crowd DynamicsBrent Morgan1, 2, Krista
Parry1, 3, Andy Platta1, 3, Mitch Wilson1,
41Mathematics, 2Engineering Physics, 3Chemistry,
4Mechanical Engineering
  • Project Description
  • Goal To accurately model the movement of
    individuals in a crowd out of a room through a
    single or multiple exits.
  • Take into account different levels of urgency
    with regard to the context of the exit
    circumstances.
  • Expand the model to include different parameters
    such as individuals pushing or shoving, as well
    as the possibility for injuries.
  • Take into account human behavior in crowd
    situations such as maintaining a certain amount
    of personal space and increased urgency as
    proximity to the exit increases.
  • Scientific Challenges Potential Applications
  • To accurately model an individuals movement
    while taking into account a certain degree of
    intelligence and free will.
  • Planning escape routes for buildings.
  • Determining room capacities for building coding.

Results
Based on our implications of the Swarm and
Kirchner models, we found that even with our
normalized parameters Bij and Rij, we were able
to recreate graphs and movement patterns as in
the two comparable models. We were able to
observe similar trends regarding parameter
values, such as comparing ks and kd. We were
also able to verify patterns relating to the
injury threshold and the percentage of people
that escape given an increasing number of initial
individuals. See the accompanying figures for
illustrations.
Figure 2 Series of screen shots at increasing
time steps during one trial with Ks3, Kd2.
Active agents denoted in blue, injured agents
denoted in red.
  • Published Models for Crowd Dynamics
  • Simulation of Evacuation Processes Using a
    Bionics-Inspired Cellular Automaton Model for
    Pedestrian Dynamics, by Ansgar Kirchner
  • Introduces the Kirchner Field Model. This model
    simulates the evacuation of people from a room.
    Peoples movements are determined
    probabilistically with the probability
    distribution depending on proximity to the door
    and the movement of other agents. We will refer
    to this model as the Kirchner model.
  • Macroscopic Effects of Microscopic Forces Between
    Agents in Crowd Models, by Colin M. Henein
  • Implements many of the ideas used in the
    Kirchner Field Model but adds to it with the
    addition of a force field that simulates agents
    pushing. This allows the addition of injuries to
    the model which render agents immobile. We will
    refer to this model as the Swarm Force model.
  • Glossary of Technical Terms
  • Cellular Automata A regular array of identical
    finite state automata whose next state is
    determined solely by their current state and the
    state of their neighbors.
  • Bosons Elementary particles that give the agents
    information about their surroundings. These
    particles are dropped by the agents when they
    occupy a cell, and other individuals are
    attracted to these particles. This can be likened
    to ants leaving a pheromone trail to signal a
    pathway for others to follow.

Figure 4 Plot of number injured as a function of
the injury threshold. Ks3, Kd3
Figure 3 Graphs of people remaining in room as a
function of time. Kd, see key, Ks3.
  • Methodology
  • Used method of direct computer simulation and
    cellular automata to construct a grid
    representation of a room with a single exit.
  • Constructed a probability distribution of an
    individuals 8 neighboring cells, based on
    factors such as the proximity to the door, and
    previous paths of individuals. (Equations shown
    on right).
  • Determine which individual moves first at each
    time step based on a Force Determining equation
    which is inversely related to the distance to the
    door.
  • Use concepts from Kirchner Field Model 4 and
    Swarm Force Model 1 use a dynamic and static
    field to determine the individuals most probable
    move and include injuries of individuals due to
    pushing or crowding.
  • The static field will be inversely related to the
    distance to the door, thus the cell that is
    closer to the door will have a higher probability
    that the individual will move to it.
  • The dynamic field keeps track of the bosons that
    individuals have left when previously occupying
    the cell. This raises the probability of an
    individual moving to the cell to simulate
    individuals following others if a path is
    successful.
  • The dynamic and static fields are weighted
    differently based on proximity to the door.
  • Pushing is allowed, and if an individual is
    pushed past the threshold, they will become
    permanently injured, indicated by a red dot in
    the following graphs.

Equations
Parameters Pij Probability of individual moving
to cell (i, j) N Normalization coefficient Bij
Normalized dynamic preference factor ?ij
Occupancy of the cell (i,j) kD Dynamic field
coefficient kS Static field coefficient Rij
Normalized static preference factor Dij
Literature dynamic preference factor Sij
Literature static preference factor ?ij Swarm
Force parameter, based on occupancy ?ij Swarm
Force parameter, based on walls Fij Force in
determining movement order of individuals (X, Y)
Coordinates of the exit door
  • Force Determining equation

Figure 5 Plot of percentage of individuals
leaving the room as a function of density of
individuals in the room. Ks3, Kd2
  • Modified Swarm Force equation
  • References
  • Henin, C. M. White, T. Macroscopic Effects of
    Microscopic Forces Between Agents in Crowd
    Models. Physica. A 373, 694-712 (2007).
  • Weng, W.G., Pan, L.L., Shen, S.F., Yuan, H.Y.
    Small-grid Analysis of Discrete Model for
    Evacuation from a Hall. Physica. A 374, 821-826
    (2007).
  • Seyfried, A., Steffen, B., Lippert, T. Basics of
    Modelling the Pedestrian Flow. Physica A 368,
    232-238 (2006).
  • Kirchner, Ansgar Schadschneider, Andreas.
    Simulation of Evacuation Processes Using a
    Bionics-Inspired Cellular Automaton Model for
    Pedestrian Dynamics. Physica. A 312, 260-276
    (2002).

Figure 1 Method determining order of individual
movement per time step, depending on the Force
Determining equation.
  • Literature Swarm Force equation
  • Acknowledgments
  • This project was mentored by Jorge Ramirez,
    whose help is acknowledged with great
    appreciation.
  • Support from a University of Arizona TRIF
    (Technology Research Initiative Fund) grant to J.
    Lega is also gratefully acknowledged.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com