CSCE790T Medical Image Processing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CSCE790T Medical Image Processing

Description:

University of South Carolina Department of Computer Science 3D Active Shape Models Integrating Robust Edge Identification and Statistical Shape Models – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:66
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: cseScEdu73
Learn more at: https://www.cse.sc.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CSCE790T Medical Image Processing


1
CSCE790T Medical Image Processing
University of South Carolina Department of
Computer Science
3D Active Shape Models Integrating Robust Edge
Identification and Statistical Shape Models
2
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

3
Introduction
  • Collaboration with UNC departments of computer
    science, and psychiatry
  • Submitted to MICCAI 07
  • Propose two new strategies to improve 3D ASM
    performance
  • Developing a robust edge-identification algorithm
    to reduce the risk of detecting false edges
  • Integrating the edge-fitting error and
    statistical shape model defined by a PDM into a
    unified cost function

4
Introduction
  • Apply the proposed ASM to the challenging tasks
    of detecting the left hippocampus and caudate
    surfaces from an subset of 3D pediatric MR images
  • Compare its performance with a recently reported
    atlas based method.

5
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

6
Motivation
  • Segmentation facilitates the discovery of
    diseased structures in medical images
  • Two neurological shape structures of interest
  • Caudate Nucleus
  • body movement and coordination
  • cauda (tail)
  • Hippocampus
  • memory and coordination
  • hippo (horse) and Kampi (curve)

7
Motivation
http//www.emedicine.com/radio/topic443.htmtarget
2
8
Motivation
http//www.sci.uidaho.edu/med532/basal.htm
9
Motivation
  • Hippocampus, and Caudate related to the following
    areas of research
  • Epileptic seizures (MTS)
  • Alzheimer disease
  • Amnesic syndromes
  • Schizophrenia
  • Parkinson's disease
  • Huntington's disease

10
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

11
General ASM Algorithm
  • Initial placement of point distribution model
    (PDM) mean shape inside image volume T (v s, t,
    ? )
  • Generate gradient magnitude values for each voxel
    location in 3D image volume
  • while not(convergence)
  • Identify strongest edge for each landmark point
    along its search path
  • Using this edge information determine new ASM
    shape
  • Update PDM global transform T(s, t, ?) and local
    transform variables
  • Verify new ASM shape with PDM shape space limits
  • If global, and local transform variables are not
    longer changing ASM has converged

12
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

13
Robust Edge Detection
  • Identify boundary edges of desired surface
    structure inside image volume
  • Each edge is represented by an gradient magnitude
    value
  • Stronger edges have larger gradient magnitude
    values

14
Robust Edge Detection
Example sagittal plane edges for hippocampus
Image slice
Gradient magnitude slice
15
Robust Edge Detection
Example coronal plane edges for hippocampus
Image slice
Gradient magnitude slice
16
Robust Edge Detection
  • Boundary edges are identified along search paths
    for each landmark point
  • Search paths are defined by profile locations (?)
    along each landmark points normal vector

17
Robust Edge Detection
  • Additionally, each landmark points normal vector
    is determined by the surface mesh

5
2
A
n6 ¼ x (nD nE nF nG) n6/ n6
1
E
F
B
6
C
8
D
3
G
4
7
18
Robust Edge Detection
19
Robust Edge Detection
  • Generally, edges detection along search paths are
    considered dangerous
  • Subject to noise
  • Spurious (false) edges

20
Robust Edge Detection
  • Propose an new neighborhood solution
  • Spatially consistent profile location (?i?)
  • Reduces the likelihood of an false edge

21
Overview
  • Introduction
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

22
Unified Cost Function
  • Traditionally each of the models local transform
    variables (bi) are updated after the ASM shape
    is found
  • If the ASM shape (u) is not defined within the
    limits of the PDM shape space the local transform
    variables (bi) are rescaled appropriately
  • Shape information may be lost
  • Re-active solution

23
Unified Cost Function
  • Steps in shape deformation where ASM shape not
    within PDM shape space limits

24
Unified Cost Function
  • Proposed solution implemented by an unified cost
    function
  • Pro-active solution
  • Efficiently solved as an quadratic programming
    problem

25
Unified Cost Function
  • The cost function can be viewed as,
  • vT (3nx1) vector global transformed mean
    shape
  • DT -1 (3nx3n) matrix global transformed
    inverse covariance matrix
  • u (3nx1) vector initial PDM mean shape or
    previous ASM shape
  • N (3nxn) matrix the normal vectors
  • ? (nx1) vector profile locations of the
    most stable edges
  • ? (nx1) vector most optimal profile
    locations

26
Overview
  • Abstract
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments Results
  • Conclusion

27
Experiments Results
  • Developed using ITK and VXL C open source
    libraries
  • Subset of 10 high resolution MRI brain images
    from pediatric study
  • 256x256x192 resolution
  • Inter-voxel spacing 1.0mm

28
Experiments Results
  • Left hippocampus PDM
  • 42 shape instances
  • 642 corresponded landmark points
  • Corresponded using MDL
  • Left caudate nucleus PDM
  • 85 shape instances
  • 742 corresponded landmark points
  • Corresponded using SPHARM

29
Experiments Results
  • Each PDM mean shape was manually initialized
    using Insight-SNAP
  • Convergence was achieved when either the global
    transform variables or mahalanobis distance
    between ASM shape and PDM mean shape were at an
    minimum.
  • Convergence was typically achieved between 5 to 7
    ASM iterations using /- 4 (k9) profile
    locations along each landmark points normal vector

30
Experiments Results
31
Experiments Results
32
Experiments Results
  • ASM segmented performance was compared against
    Atlas-based method
  • Performance was evaluated using the following
    measures
  • Pearson correlation coefficient volumetric
    correlation
  • Dice coefficient volumetric overlap

33
Experiments Results
34
Overview
  • Abstract
  • Motivation
  • General ASM Algorithm
  • Robust Edge Detection
  • Unified Cost Function
  • Experiments / Results
  • Conclusion

35
Conclusion
  • Presented two new strategies to address
    limitations of current ASM.
  • Robust edge detection to reduce likelihood of
    spurious edge
  • Pro-active solution ensure ASM approximated shape
    is defined within PDM shape space limits using
    unified cost function
  • Additional research is required to address the
    sensitivity of the initial placement
  • Implement fully-automatic method
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com