Destination 1

1
Destination 1

• Local Evaluators

2
Who Are You?

• Roles
• Responsibilities
• Perspective

3
Kick-Off Goals

• Goal 1 Increase connections to each other, state
  and national resources, their local communities
  and the youth we serve.
• True Community
• Networking
• Listservs
• Meetings
• Youth Advisory Groups
• Parent Advisory Groups

4
Kick-Off Goals

• Goal 2 Increase connections to learning and
  professional development at all levels
  (administration, site staff, vendors, and
  partners.)
• Professional Development
• Budget
• Aligning P.D. with Grant Goals and Evaluation
• Standards
• Core Competencies
• Certificate/Credential

5
Kick-Off Goals

• Goal 3 Increase connections to the school day,
  teachers, curriculum, and administration.
• Embedded Academics
• Meetings
• Common Language
• Intentional Alignment

6
Grant Contract

• Assurances
• Fiscal Agent/Authorized Officials
• Co-Applicants
• Superintendents
• Principals
• Partners

• Road Map
• What
• When
• How
• Who

7
FEDERAL TARGETS
8
Michigans improvement on reading grades stayed
the same.

• Federal target this year was 60, increased from
  last year by 5.
• Michigan did not meet the federal target.
• Michigan has consistently had about a third of
  students improve by ½ grade.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids.
9
Michigans improvement on math grades dropped
slightly since last year.

• Federal target was 48.5.
• Michigan did not meet the federal target.
• Michigan showed a slight decline this year.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids.
10
Michigan did not meet the target in MEAP Reading.

• The federal target was raised from 28 to 35.
• There were slight increases in the percent of
  students who improved.
• More middle/high school students improved their
  MEAP reading scores than elementary students.
• However, elementary students made somewhat
  steeper gains than middle/high school students
  this year.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids. students who moved to Proficient in the
current year from Not Proficient in the previous
year.
11
Michigans met the target for middle/high school
students, but not elementary students, in MEAP
Math.

• The federal target was raised from 16 to 20.
• Middle/high school students met the target, but
  declined from the previous year.
• Elementary students did not meet the new target,
  but stayed stable.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids. students who moved to Proficient in the
current year from Not Proficient in the previous
year.
12
Michigan did not meet the target this year for
improved homework completion/classroom
participation.

• The federal target is 77.
• Michigan did not meet the target, but is fairly
  close.
• Michigan has remained stable for the past two
  years.

National data not available for past two
years. Teacher survey data.
13
Michigan did not meet the target this year for
improved student behavior.

• The federal target is 75.
• Michigan did not meet the target, but is close.
• Michigan has been stable for the past three
  years.

National data not available for past two
years. Teacher survey data.
14
ROOM FOR IMPROVEMENT

• (Grades Only)

15
Michigan youth whose grades had room for
improvement were much closer to meeting the
target.

• Nearly half of Michigan students who had room to
  improve did so.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids. Room for improvement reading grades of
3.0 or less.
16
Michigan youth whose grades have room for
improvement were close to the target on math
grades.

• Students with room for improvement were closer to
  meeting the target.
• Slight declines were evident this year.

National data not available for past two
years. 2009-10 does not include Detroit or Grand
Rapids. Room for improvement math grades of
3.0 or less.
17
What does this mean for you?

• Some sites met targets, some did not.
• Each sites status on federal targets is outlined
  in the ARF tables.
• When you receive the ARF tables, look at data to
  see how each site did on targets.
• If a site did not meet targets, look at data to
  see how site did on academic instruction and
  instructional context.
• Identify improvement goals and strategies to meet
  those goals based on the data and your knowledge
  of your program.

18
TACSS

• Technical Assistance and Coaching Support Services

19
The Purpose of TACSS is to

• Improve the overall quality of 21st Century
  Community Learning Centers.
• Offer start-up support for new 21st Century
  sites.
• Grow a culture of performance . accountability
  and an infrastructure for continuous quality
  improvement .

20
The Quality Improvement Process
21
TACSS services are provided by
CYPQ the YPQA People
22
Meet the TACSS Team
Amber Duddy, Program Assistant
Angelina Garner, Manager
23
Meet the TACSS Coaches
Jerome Threlkeld, Central and East
Trevor Davies, North and West
Gina McGovern, South East
24
TACSS Services available to ALL 21st CCLC
programs

• Self Assessment Support
• Youth PQA Basics Workshop (live and online NEW
  Platform!)
• Youth PQA Plus! Workshop NEW!
• Planning With Data Workshop
• Scores Reporter Webinars NEW Platform!
• Professional Development
• Youth Work Methods Workshops (targeted audience
  site staff)
• Quality Coaching Workshop (targeted audience
  site managers)
• Lunch and Learn Networking Series (targeted
  audience all staff)
• Technical Assistance
• Scores Reporter access and issues

25
2009 2010 in Numbers

• 37 trainings
• 2081 attendees

26
Satisfaction with TACSS

• 100 of end-of-year survey respondents reported
• given the demands of my job, the Youth PQA self
  assessment process is a good use of my time.
• TACSS trainers receive an average score of 4.55
  on Overall quality of training on workshop
  evaluation forms.

27
Register for ALL trainings at Michigan.cypq.org
28
Youth PQA Trainings

• Youth PQA Basics
• Learn to use the Youth PQA tool and how to lead
  or participate in the self assessment process.

• Youth PQA Plus! NEW!
• Must be familiar with the Youth PQA tool.
• Learn guidelines and strategies for including the
  Youth PQA throughout the year.

Also offered ONLINE
11/ 5 _at_ Grand Rapids 11/ 11 _at_ Detroit 900
100
10/ 22 _at_ Oakland ISD 10/ 29 _at_ Kalamazoo 900
100
29
Scores Reporter Webinar

• CYPQ is launching a NEW! online learning system
  with user-friendly features
• Step-by-step guide to entering
• self assessment data
• due 12/ 15
• Program Improvement Plan due 2/ 7

12/ 1 _at_ 1000 AM 12/ 7 _at_ 100 PM 12/ 14 _at_ 1000 AM
30
Planning With Data

• Dig into your self assessment data as a team
• Start (if not complete) your Program Improvement
  Plan (due February 7)

It was fun. I thought a data training would be
boring, but was pleasantly surprised! -MI 21st
CCLC Participant
12/ 10 _at_ Traverse City 1/ 14 _at_ Genesee 1/ 21 _at_
Grand Rapids 900 100
31
Quality Coaching

• Help staff improve by having one-on-one
  conversations with them about their instructions.
  
• Learn the process of Observation-Reflection to
  support staff to develop professionally.

9/ 17 _at_ Flint 9/ 28 _at_ Battle Creek 900 100
32
Networking Lunch and Learn

• Semi-structured discussion forums
• Think about and discuss best practices with your
  peers.
• Lunch is provided!

11/ 19 _at_ Macomb ISD 3/ 18 _at_ Muskegon 900 100

33
Thank you!

• For questions about training or for online
  assistance, contact
• Amber Duddy,
• Program Assistant
• 734.961.6900 x 208
• amber_at_cypq.org

Register for ALL trainings at Michigan.cypq.org