Title: Sleep Like A Baby? What Does That Really Mean? (In Vermont)
1Sleep Like A Baby? What Does That Really Mean?
(In Vermont)
James J. McKenna Ph.D Edmund P.Joyce C.S.C. Chair
in Anthropology..Director, Mother-Baby Behavioral
Sleep Laboratory
University of Notre Dame du Lac
2What is normal, healthy infant sleepDo we
answer from a biological or recent cultural point
of view? Does it matter? If so, How?
- How and in what ways has culture by way of social
values and goals mediated and influenced not only
the study and conceptualizing of infant sleep
i.e. proper positioning, arrangement, nighttime
feeding patterns, and appropriate parental
responses - but the biology of both maternal and infant sleep
in complex urban western settings?
- Why do 20-40 of western babies have sleep
problems to solve?
31.Disarticulated from mother No touch No
smells No sounds No movement No body
heat No breadth exchange
4Fact The only object/surface/entity on or around
which the baby is designed to sleep remains the
mothers body.
5There is no such thing as a baby, there is a
baby and someone. D.Winnicott
6...in our enthusiasm to view the human infant
(culturally) as a separable, autonomous organism,
we have pushed too far the concept of the
infants physiological independence from the
parentconfusing the infants preparedness to
adapt, with actual adaptation confusing the
infants abilities to sleep alone with moral and
scientific truths and meanings
7Hierarchy of value is imposed
- On moral grounds
- the good baby vs. the bad baby,
- but also, the effective /strong parent vs. the
ineffective/weak parent - On scientific grounds
- The developmentally superior, competent baby vs.
the inferior, less competent (spoiled/indulged)
baby
8 Limitations of Western Pediatric Sleep and SIDS
Research
adult- centric non-evolutionary ethnocentric
(a)theoretical (no theory around which to
interpret clinical events or research results)
Who is the infant? What do infants need? What
criteria should be used to decide, that is...
dominant cultural practices? biological?
species-wide? local? Western reductionist science
methods have not served infants well.. Eliminated
concept of the mother-infant dyad as the unit
of analysis
9Western pediatric medicine suffers from what
Professor George Williams callsthe fallacy of
medical normalcy.. if we do it, or practice it,
or value it (in western society)..it must be
right and/or appropriate
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12Interacting factors-- (most and least relevant
?) From Sally Baddock (New Zealand) Peter Blair
and Helen Ball (Great Britain), Caroline
McQuillan (Australia) James McKenna and Lane
Volpe (USA)
Cultural
least relevant
Where babies actually sleep
Scientific Public Health
Family
including economic status
Infant and Parental Biology Including Feeding
Method
most relevant
13Its not what we know that gets us into
trouble.its what we knowthat just aint
so! From Everybodys Friend (1874) By Mark Twain
14.culturally favored child care practices change
independent of, and much faster than, infant
biology. (ideologies or goals that underlie
recommendations are often historical and
ideological in origin but passed off as, if not
confused for, scientific findings)
15if...sleeping alone through the night is
medically good for babies
In the west solitary sleeping arrangements became
entangled with, and one and the same with, good
morals
- then dont good babies do so, and good
parents enforce it?
16Cascading Inter-connections Regarding Western
Parent-infant Sleep Conflicts
- (Infants rarely have sleep problems, parents
do..!) - Western parents suffer from a variety of damaging
diseases not the least of which is.. the disease
of false and unrealistic expectations..a cultural
and not a biological model of infants sleep
patterns - the disease of confusing parental desires and
wishes and best interest with that of their
infants - the diemodel of sleep--the only good sleep is
an uninterrupted one - that infant sleep behavior correlates with good
moral character, and general future social skills
and competenciesin domains other than sleep - the presumption of an adversarial relationship
existing between infants and parents as regards
sleep..Consider the book title Winning Bedtime
Sleep Battles..and Babywise
17Why Our Babies Cant Sleep and Why Western
Parents Are the Most Exhausted And Disappointed
Parents In The World
- suffer from the disease of misinformed
expectations - devoid of the relational familial factors
(where baby sleeps and feeds as regards parental
emotions and goals) - devoid of intrinsic (infant) factors
(temperament, personality , sensitivities) - categorizes infants inability to follow
cultural model asdisease, sleep disorder,
immaturity, and, thus, infant becomes a
patient - promotes one- size- should- fit- all
- promotes one sleeping arrangement as a moral
issue and gives it a specific set of
inappropriate meanings
18Why Do Parents Have Infant Sleep Problems To
Solve?
- Because no two people in any relationship have
exactly the same best interests..always
trade-offs are involvedsleep is relational..not
medical - current one-size- must- fit- all model devoid of
relational-emotional aspects including unique
infant intrinsic factors - such as infant sleep personality-temperament and
how these articulate with unique needs of parents
to respond to perceived infant needs, as well as
the parents own needs for contact with their
infants - Current models either ignore altogether the
critical relationship between nighttime
breastfeeding and sleep, or minimize its
significance to infant-maternal health.. seeing
breastfeeding as a threat and not added value - wish nighttime feeding would just go away as it
threatens the priority given to consolidated
sleep (the predominant cultural - value)
- Transition away from thinking of co-sleeping as
pathology (psychology) to dangerous (medical)
19Until recent, western historic periods, no human
parents ever asked Where will my baby sleep, how
will I lay my baby down to sleep, and how will I
feed my baby? most human parents still dont!
20For the human infant the three functionally
inter-related (adaptive) components of normal,
healthy infant sleep include
- Sleep location
- (next to mother for social or co-sleeping
behavior involving on-going sensory exchanges,
monitoring and mutual regulation) - Nighttime feeding
- exclusive breast feeding
- Sleep position
- Back (supine)
21The cultural-medical dismantling of this
biological system led to the deaths of thousands
of western infants from, SIDS, accidental
asphyxiations and/or other SUDI (i.e. from
social sleep to solitary infant sleep-- from
breast feeding to bottle-formula feeding from
supine to prone infant sleep position
22THE UNDERMINING OF MATERNAL CONFIDENCE AND
KNOWLEDGE Benjamin Spock wrote to mothers in
Baby Care
- You know more than you think you do.
- dont be afraid to trust your common sense.
Bringing up baby wont be a complicated job if
you take it easy, trust your own instincts, and
follow the directions your doctor gives you! - cited by tina thenevin,1993, mothering and
fathering
23To understand current debate/discourse over sleep
must understand Bridget Jordans delineation of
the place of authoritative medical knowledge in
our western culture.
- Decision -making hierarchy is distributed--physici
an at top, lactation consultant, nurses, parents
at bottom - the power of authoritative knowledge is not that
it is correct but that it counts - Standard Care enforced by legal and
institutional actions - Examples prosecution of Salt Lake City couple
whose infant died after co-sleeping (child abuse
homicide) or lactation consultants fired if they
give safety information on bedsharing.
- Invalidates other knowledge systems
- Parental knowledge counts for nothing
- Parents must override instincts- as medical
personnel always know best
Modified from Birth In Four Cultures by Bridget
Jordan
24Authoritative medical knowledge
- to legitimize one way of knowing as
authoritative devalues, often totally
dismisses, all other ways of knowing. Those who
reject authoritative knowledge systems tend to be
seen as backward, ignorant, or naïve
troublemakers
25Socio-cultural and Historical Factors and Forces
Leading to Erroneous Scientific Understandings
(Undermining Parental Confidences and
Empowerment)
- rise of child care experts using moral judgments
as a basis of recommending what infants
need..what is worth investing in as a
practice.. - belief in superiority of technology, rather than
on maternal bodies to stimulate, hold and
nurture - emphasis on average expectable population
outcomes rather than on individual variability
or potential.. per any given behavioral
parenting strategy - emphasis on ethnocentric social values and
ideologies (not biology) to guide research and
conclusions..fallacy of medical normalcy
(GWilliams) - improper medicalization of relational
(caregiving) issues ..assumed to be best
understood by pediatricians (who generally have
no training in human social development or human
evolution - Pathologizing of normal behavior (crying when
left alone) ..making infants into patients
(blaming the victim for the crime) in need of
correction when they fail to follow cultural
scripts..Never let a baby fall asleep at the
breast AAP Guidelines For Infant Sleep - social constructions of infancy, not /biological-
evolutionary based (influences of Freud, Klein,
Watson..psychology in general) - Science of infant feeding (bottle-formula
feeding) and sleep pediatrics became one and the
same with mutually reinforcing moral ideas about
who infant should be, or become, rather than who
they areand how husbands and wives should relate
vis a vis distance, authority and separation from
childrenalso, ideologies about the bedroom as a
sexual place..
26(No Transcript)
27The Complex History of Infant Sleeping
Arrangements In Western Industrial Societies Is
Reduced To Simple Understandings Congruent With
Present Cultural Beliefs
- inevitable suffocation/overlying/SIDS
- inevitable psychic damage to infant
- inevitable rupture to conjugal (husband/wife)
relationship - inevitable prolonged dependency of infant/ child
- inevitable lack of autonomy in infant/child
- NOTE not one controlled scientific study
documents the benefits of solitary infant sleep,
or the alleged deleterious social/psychological/ph
ysiological consequences of safe cosleeping with
breast feeding
28How A Folk Myth (normal, healthy babies sleep
alone) Achieved Scientific Validation
1 Initial test conditioninfant sleeps alone,
is bottle fed, and has little or no parental
contact
5 To produce healthy infant sleep, replicate
the test condition
Scientific validation of solitary infant sleep
as normal and healthy
2 Derive measurements of infant sleep under
these conditions
4 Publish clinical model on what constitutes
desirable, healthy infant sleep.
3 Repeat measurements across ages, creating an
infant sleep model
29(No Transcript)
30Changing perceptions.of whats good for
babyThe constant handling of an infant is not
good for him. The less he is lifted, held and
passed from one pair of hands to another, the
better, as while he is young his bones are soft
and constant handling does not tend to improve
their development nor the shapeliness of his
little body. the newborn infant should spend the
greater portion of his life on the bed
- FROM THE BABY
- MARIANNA WHEELER 1901
- HARPER BROS NEW YPRK LONDON
31CHANGING PERCEPTIONS OF WHAT INFANTS NEED... THE
MOTHERHOOD BOOK (1935)
- Babies should be trained from their earliest
days to sleep regularly and should never be woken
in the night for feeding. - Baby should be given his own bedroom from the
very beginning. he should never be brought into
the living room at night
32Richard Ferber, M.D.
- Director,
- Center for
- Pediatric
- Sleep Disorders, Childrens
- Hospital, Boston
- slide courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy Goldberg
33(No Transcript)
34Dr. Richard Ferber changes his mind..?? But the
larger and more important question isWhat is it
about our culture that makes us care, or makes it
important what someone who has no familiarity
with our baby or our family thinks about this
very personal issue?
- If you find that you actually prefer to to sleep
with your baby you should consider your own
feelings very carefully. - Whatever you want to do , whatever you feel
comfortable doing, is the right thing to do, as
longs as it works.. most problems can be solved
regardless of the philosophical approach chosen
(Ferber 2006 41)
1976
2006
35(1976, 1999)Sleeping in your bed can make an
infant confused and anxious rather than relaxed
and reassured. Even a toddler may find this
repeated experience overly stimulating(2006)
Changing concepts related to where babies can or
should sleep..the beat goes on
- Children do not grow up insecure just because
they sleep alone or with other siblings, away
from their parents and they are not prevented
from learning to separate, or from developing
their own sense of individuality simply because
they sleep with their parents (Ferber 200641).
36Sleeping With Baby An Internet -based Sampling
of Parental Experiences, Choices, Perceptions,
and Interpretations In A Western Industrialized
ContextJ.J. McKenna and L.E. Volpe in press
Inf. Child Dev.
- Based on self-selected sample of 200 mostly
middle class mothers from Canada, United States,
Australia, and Great Britain. - 400 pages of narrative ethno histories in
response to nine questions
37Sleeping With Baby An Internet -based Sampling
of Parental Experiences, Choices, Perceptions,
and Interpretations In A Western Industrialized
Context
- How did you, do you, co-sleep?
- How long did you/have you co-slept?
- Why are you co sleeping, or, why did you
co-sleep? - If you already have children who moved on from
co-sleeping, what do you think of your
experience? - If you are still co-sleeping, what do you think
of it now (i.e. as opposed to your attitude when
you began? - How well do your children sleep now?
- Are you breast feeding or did you breast feed? If
so, for how long? - Do you and/or your partner smoke?
- By co-sleeping, do you think you ever saved your
childs life? - questions originally posted on
38Recurrent parental themes
- awareness of comments concerning warnings
against bedsharing and knowledge of bedsharing
risks - relationship between breast feeding and
bedsharing - emotional bases of and correlates to co-sleeping
for mothers (parents) and infants alike - transition to separate beds
- co-sleeping and effects on childs
socio-emotional development - potential life saving experiences
39ON RESPONDING TO INFANT CRIES...
- A RAPID AND SYMPATHETIC RESPONSE TO OUR BABIES
CRIES IS THE FOUNDATION OF STRONG FAMILY VALUES,
NOT THE UNDERMINING OF THEM... - FROM HARVEY KARPHAPPIEST BABY ON THE BLOCK
(2002)
40(No Transcript)
41Ahhh The question of promoting infant
independence(three questions)
- what exactly is independence for a 2-3 month
old infant? - does it really correlate with solitary infant
sleep practices? - is independence of children what parents really
want?
42But, is independence really best in the long
run.. that is, is independence from parental
intervention at 13 or 14 years of age as
desirable as it is, say, at 2 months?
- Does sleeping alone actually correlate with
autonomy, competence, and/or confidence, or
happiness or to any other desirable personality
attribute not obtainable through some other
arrangement or other childhood socialization
experiences?
43According to Daniel Stern (1985)
- ..the emotionally disturbed patient is one whose
early experiences lacked attunement..the
tracking and attuning--which permits one person
to be with another in the sense of sharing likely
inner experience on an almost continuous basis
44When dependence IS autonomy
Autonomy in the sense of psychotherapy, implies
taking control of ones lifeemotional autonomy
does not mean isolation or avoidance of
dependency. On the contrary, the lonely schizoid
individual who preserves his independence at
all cots may well be in a state of emotional
heteronomy, unable to bear closeness with another
person because of inner dread and confusion.
45dependency AS autonomy
A similar state of emotional heteronomy affects
the psycho- path who is unaware of the feelings
of others. The emotionally autonomous individual
does not suppress her feelings, including the
need for dependence, but takes cognizance of
them, ruling rather than being ruled by them
(Homes and Lindley 1989)
The Value of Psychotherapy (1991) J.Holmes and
R.Lindley. Oxford University Press
46 Crying
47Chimps have.
..bad days, too!
48Recent cultural ideologies place BOTH infants and
parents at odds with their biology (emotions)
- Western Caregiving
- Child is not in contact with mother most of the
time (crib, stroller) - Baby is kept supine
- Scheduled separated feedings
- Social pressures not to respond to infant crying
for fear of spoiling - Separation, minimal feedings, is thought to be
good for baby
49Function of Crying
- primary form of pre-verbal communication
- evolved maximize chances of infant survival and
parental reproductive success. - signals infant distress, fear, hunger, pain
and/or discomfort.. - crying ensures proximity to parent, protection
from predators.. (Bowlby) - Though crying is not the normal way by which
infants receive breast milkcrying is a late sign
of infant hunger signals
50Evolutionary Adaptedness
- A number of studies in human infants have
confirmed the potential importance of both
contact and nutrients as regulators of infant
behavioral stateincreasing carrying from 3 to
more than 4 hours a day reduces durationof
crying/fussing behavior by 43 at 6 weeks of age
(41).
51Controlled crying (or controlled comforting..or
sleep training)
- a technique to manage infants and young children
who do not settle alone or who wake at night, or
who settle only if held or if permitted to sleep
in proximity or contact with their parents. - involves leaving the infant to cry for
increasingly longer periods of time before
providing comfort - the goal is to condition infants or young
children to sooth themselves back to sleep and
to stop them from crying or calling out during
the night
52Australian Association of Infant Mental Health
Position Paper
- It is normal and healthy for infants and young
children not to sleep through the night and to
need attention from parents. This should not be
labeled a disorder except where it is clearly
outside the usual patterns - Parents should be reassured that attending to
their infants needs/crying will not cause a
lasting habit..Waking in older infants and
young children may be due to separation anxiety,
and in these cases sleeping with or next to a
parent is a valid option. This often enables all
to get a good nights sleep
53Australian Association of Infant Mental Health
- The AAIMHI is concerned
- controlled crying is not consistent with what
infants need for their optimal emotional and
psychological health, and may have unintended
negative consequences - From Controlled Crying AAIMHI Position Paper
November 2002
54Traditional Western Pediatric and Clinical
Approaches and assumptions to Infant Sleep
- perpetuate the very environmental conditions that
give rise to the parent-infant sleep problems
they are asked to solve
55Controlled crying and or sleep training
techniques and philosophies
- reflect social ideologies
- not scientific findings about who infants are
and what infants need based on empirically-based,
scientific- biological studies - techniques reflect who we think we want infants
to be (convenient) or become or should become
(autonomous/independent) as early in life as is
possible
56First Question
- What cultural assumptions about infants and their
sleep and developmental needs, lead to caregiving
practices which induce infants to cry in the
first place, which in turn make controlled
crying techniques seemingly necessary?
57Second Question (there is a choice)
- What exactly needs to be changed?
- should babies be changed can they be changed
(biologically? - -or-
- should the ideas and assumptions which underlie
and justify recent western infant care
recommendations be changed ? - who gets to decide?
58Its one thing to ask if some infants can be
conditioned or trained to sleep alone,
unattended.. through the night (unsupervised,
unfed and unintended)
- Its altogether a different and more serious
matter to ask if they should be, or if it is not
nice, dangerous or injurious in either the long
or short run
59Misunderstandings by parents often motivate the
use of controlled crying techniques. Parents
are led to believe infants will be cognitively or
socially handicapped--no scientific studies
support such predictions..
60Infant cryingis it normal or necessary, or an
expectable behavioral expression found in daily
life ? or
- an alarm signal reserved for critical
circumstances involving.. pain, hunger, fear
(separation from the caregiver)--all or some of
these?
61Evidence that it is neither expectable nor
beneficial, but deleterious..
- requires considerable physiological effort with
- increase heart and lung activity (Rao et al.
1993 Lester et al 1985), - increased energy loss through..
- Heart rate increases (Pillai and Jane 1990)
- Augmented plasma cortisol levels
- Decreased blood oxygenation (Anders et al.
1970Levesque et al. 1994)
62And , yet, from a western cultural medical
(clinical) perspective
- protesting infants are considered to be
developmentally inferior, immature, or spoiled
compared with infants who comply or acquiesce
passively to the cultural model of
separation-----which actually endangers
infants.. - And parents of such infants assume either that
their infants are deficient, or that they lack
good parenting skills???
63Evidence -Based Science Infants sleeping alone
in a room by themselves are at least twice as
likely to die from SIDS than are infants sleeping
in the company (same room) as a committed adult
caregiverSources Great Britain (Blair et al
1999), New Zealand (Mitchell and Scragg 1995),
and European Collaborative Study (Carpenter
et.al.in press, Lancet)
64With respect to crying? and smiling ?
- Both these perceptuo-motor mechanisms according
to Bowlbypromotes maternal attachment.. - turning on ??, and turning off ?, of each---
become socially and psychologically mediated as
the infants neocortex myelinates (baby decides
whether or not or if, to cry or smileand to whom
or for whomand when to do so.
65AAIMHI.. recommends that parents should be told.
- The method has not been assessed in terms of
stress on the infant or the impact on the
infants emotional development - A full professional assessment of the childs
health, and child and family relationships should
be undertaken before initiating a controlled
crying program - .this should include an assessment of whether
the infants crying is outside the normal levels
66Clinical Application
- Inform parents that early infant crying is normal
and makes sense from an evolutionary standpoint - Possible solution to reduce the prolonged
crying of colic change normative caregiving,
rather than treating intrinsic or extrinsically
induced pathology in the infant - Maintain contact and proximity to infant.
67Infant and Child Development (Special Issue)
- (2007) Vol16, Issue 4 331-469
- Co-sleeping during infancy and early childhood
Key findings and future directions (457-467) - Wendy Goldberg and Meret Keller
68Next few slides modified from and/or courtesy
ofMeret Keller and Wendy Goldberg.UC Irvine
Dept of PsychologyModeling co-sleeping as a
medical disorder
-
- Co-sleeping Night wakings
- Night wakings Sleep problems
- THEREFORE
- Co-sleeping Sleep problems
69However
- Cross-cultural samplesChina, India
- Southeast Asia, Japan and others
- U.S. co-sleeping sub- groups such as African
-Americans, Hispanics, La Leche
League-Breastfeeding mothers - populations..
-
-
Night wakings not perceived as problematic by
all mothers!
Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy Goldberg
70How such nighttime arousals by infants are
evaluated depends on
-
- Begin in infancy?
- OR
- Begin in toddlerhood/
- preschool?
- A preferred parental
- practice?
- OR
-
- Perceived as a
- necessary evil?
Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy Goldberg
71Sleep Groups (UCI Family Sleep Research Project
Keller Goldberg, 2004)
- Solitary Sleepers
- Slept alone from 6 months through 3 years
- Reactive Co-Sleepers
- Slept alone by 6 months began co-sleeping
during second or third year - Early Co-Sleepers
- Bedsharers for at least the first year
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
72Meret Keller and Wendy Goldberg Objective and
Hypotheses
- The primary objective of this study was to
provide empirical data on co-sleeping in relation
to reported sleep problems and preschool
children's independence and autonomy. A secondary
aim of this study was to investigate sub-types of
co-sleeping. - Early co-sleeping mothers view solitary sleeping
more negatively and co-sleeping more positively
than either solitary sleeping or reactive
co-sleeping mothers. - Reactive co-sleeping mothers report more
child-related sleep problems and perceive these
problems as more intense than do solitary
sleeping and early co-sleeping mothers. - Solitary sleeping children exhibit greater
independence in sleep and other domains at
preschool age compared to early and reactive
co-sleeping children.
73Results
- Mothers of co-sleepers were least supportive of
solitary sleeping. - Reactive co-sleepers had the most sleep problems
(e.g., night wakings) and their mothers perceived
them as problematic. - Solitary sleepers were the most independent in
the sleep domain. - As preschoolers, early co-sleepers were most
independent with peers and in self-care skills.
74Measures
- Sleep Practices Questionnaire (items adapted from
Crowell et al., 1987 Greenberger Goldberg,
1989 Lee, 1992 Lozoff, et al., 1984 Stillman,
1999). - Independence (not relying on others, Deci et
al., 1993 Deci Ryan, 1985) in domains of
sleep, self-reliance, and social behavior with
peers.
75Sample and Sleep Groups DefinedMeret Keller and
Wendy Goldberg
- The sample consisted of 83 preschool-aged
children (54 female) and their mothers, who were
well-educated, middle to upper middle-class, 71
Caucasian, 18 Asian American, and 5 Latina. - SOLITARY SLEEPERS
- SLEPT ALONE BY 6 MONTHS AND CONTINUED THAT
ARRANGEMENT TO AGE 3 - REACTIVE CO-SLEEPERS
- SLEPT ALONE AT 6 MONTHS
- BEGAN CO-SLEEPING DURING SECOND
- OR THIRD YEAR FOR AT LEAST A 6-
- MONTH PERIOD
- EARLY CO-SLEEPERS
- BEDSHARERS AT 6 MONTHS WHO CONTINUED CO-SLEEPING
AT LEAST UNTIL 12 MONTHS
76For exampleReactive Co-Sleeping Unwanted,
unplanned co-sleeping
- Definitions
- Children who start out as solitary sleepers in
infancy and share the parents bed as toddlers or
preschoolers - Children who co-sleep (regardless of age) because
they have difficulty sleeping alone even though
the parents prefer separate sleeping arrangements
(i.e., unplanned, unwanted co-sleeping) -
-
Reactive co-sleeping families emerge as a
distinct group from early/intentional co-sleeping
families.
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
77Criteria for Sleep Groups
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
78FINDINGSSupport for Reactive Co-Sleeper Group
-
- Early and reactive co-sleeping
- children awakened more
- frequently than solitary sleepers
- Reactive co-sleeping mothers
- perceived their childrens night
- wakings as more problematic
- than other mothers
- THEREFORE Early co-sleeping mothers did
not perceive their childs night wakings as
problematic
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
79Child Outcomes
- Early co-sleeping children, as preschoolers,
reportedly more independent in non-sleep domains
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
80Independence in Sleep Domain
- Solitary sleepers most independent in sleep
domain - Solitary sleepers fell asleep on own at earlier
age - Solitary sleepers (M5.0 months)
- Reactive co-sleepers (M11.0 months)
- Early co-sleepers (M26.9 months)
- Solitary sleepers slept through the night at
earlier age - Solitary sleepers (M6.2 months)
- Reactive co-sleepers (M13.6 months)
- Early co-sleepers (M25.5 months)
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
81Independence in Non-Sleep Domains
- As preschoolers, early co-
- sleepers were most
- independent in
- Social relations with peers
- Self-care/daily living skills
-
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
82Maternal and Family Outcomes
-
- Maternal autonomy support
- Early co-sleeping mothers more supportive of
their childs autonomy and less controlling than
mothers in other groups - Marital intimacy
- No differences in marital intimacy across sleep
groups
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
83Additional Child Outcomes Research
- No differences in behavioral problems at 2 and 3
years of age for co-sleepers and solitary
sleepers (except difficulty getting to sleep and
night wakings) (Madansky and Edelbrock, 1990) - No differences, at age 6, in behavioral
difficulties, emotional maturity, mood and
affect, or creativity (Okami et al., 2002) - No differences, at age 18, on childs ability to
relate to parents, adults in general, other
family members or peers. No link between
bedsharing history and childs likelihood of
using alcohol/tobacco/hard drugs having problems
with self-acceptance engaging in vandalism,
fights or serious crimes being sexually active
or having either positive or negative sexual
experiences (Okami et al. 2002) - Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
84Three In A Bed Where Do Fathers Fit In?
Photo Idea Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
New Research Summer 2008 underlying hormonal
basis of social bond formation and attachment
during nighttime care amongst fathers and their
infants and children..Lee Gettler and James
McKenna
85Fathers
- In British sample, most fathers shared bed with
infant 3-5 months post-birth, at least
occasionally, even when had not expected to
bedshare - Fathers responded positively to bedsharing at 3-5
months post-birth, even when it was not
anticipated prior to the birth of their child - Fathers (particularly first-time fathers) had
fears of rolling over on their infant and of
disrupted sleep due to the infants presence in
the bed, but once they adjusted to bedsharing,
these fears were alleviated. - Most fathers appeared to enjoy the experience,
and did not consider the presence of their infant
in bed as an intrusion on their marital
relationship (Ball et al., 2000) - Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
86More on Fathers
- Fathers and mothers endorsed similar reasons for
their families sleep arrangements, although
reasons differed by type of sleep arrangement - Satisfaction with sleep arrangements was more
likely for fathers and mothers whose attitudes
coincided with their actual sleep practices - A similar, highly satisfied, stable pattern was
apparent for fathers and mothers of solitary
sleepers and early co-sleepers, but satisfaction
for mothers and fathers of reactive sleepers
waned over time. - Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
87Will They Ever Leave?
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
88WHEN To Move Child To Own Room?
- Depends on family and cultural values
- Does child kick and move around too much?
- Is child getting too big (not enough room?)
- Are parents feeling support or pressure from
family/friends/culture? - Does child feel comfortable/ready to move out?
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg
89HOW To Move Child To Own Room?
- As many ways as there are families
- When child is ready
- Move into room with older sibling
- Parent sleeps temporarily in childs room until
child is comfortable sleeping on own - Buy new bunk beds with CARS or DORA THE EXPLORER
bedsheets and blankets - Futon on floor of parents room until child feels
comfortable sleeping on own - Part-night in own room part night with parents
Powerpoint Courtesy of Meret Keller and Wendy
Goldberg