Title: Quality of Democracy. Democracy Barometer for Established Democracies
1Quality of Democracy.Democracy Barometer for
Established Democracies
- Marc Bühlmann, Wolfgang Merkel, Bernhard Weßels
- NCCR Democracy Project 14
- Bratislava 7/3/2008
2Structure of the Project 7-step Analysis
- 1st step Fundamental principles of democracy
- 2nd step Root Concept of Democracy
- 3rd step From partial regimes to functions
- 4th step From functions to components
- 5th step From components to indicators
- 6th step Measuring the quality of democracy
- 7th step Research beyond measurement
31st Step The Principles of Democracy
- Equality (political)
- Freedom (individual)
- Control (institutional)
42nd Step Root Concept The concept of embedded
democracy
5Internal Embeddedness
- Mutual embeddedness
- Normative and functional interdependence
- Normative and functional independence
63rd Step From Partial Regimes to Functions
74th Step From Partial Regimes and its Functions
to Components
- 1. Electoral regime representation,
accountability - Universal active suffrage
- Universal passive suffrage
- Free and fair elections
- 2. Political-rights regime participation,
responsiveness - Freedom of opinion
- Freedom to associate and to form coalitions
- Equal political rights to participate
84th Step (contd)
- 3. Civil-rights regime freedom
- Individual rights
- Equality before the law
- Equal access to courts
- 4. Horizontal-accountability regime constraint
of executive autonomy - Checks and balances
- Independence of the judiciary
- Rule of law (binding rules for the executive)
- 5. Effective power to govern government autonomy
- National territorial dimension
- National functional dimension
- Global dimension
95th Step From Components to Indicators
106th Step Measurement first option
structural Evaluation cobwebs fictional
examples for three cases
Performance of partial regimes
112. Option functional model The Dimensions of
Democracy Fictional Example
12Political Participation in Slovak Republic
13The Status and Development of Political
Participation
- Equality of electoral participation and the
equality of qualified participation are very high - Effective use of participation (electoral and
non-institutionalized) is poor - Lack of access to information has increased (but
still below OECD-average) - Number and scopes of elections have increased
- ? Access to information and participation
instruments have to be strengthened
14Political Participation in Slovak Republic(30
OECD Countries)
Year Rank Value OECD Average
1990 13 32.3 31.3
1995 8 33.9 30.8
2000 6 38.0 32.5
2007 3 42.6 32.9
Source Democracy Barometer, preliminary results.
15Slovak Republic and Germany compared (1995 / 2005)
16Slovak Republic and Germany compared (1995)
17Slovak Republic and Germany compared (2005)
18Representation in Slovak Republic
19The Status and Development of Representation
- No constraints for active suffrage
- Constraints for passive suffrage
- Not very equal weight of votes (but increasing
equality) - Unequal chances for representation (especially
considering gender) - ? Chances for representation should be made more
equal
20Representation in Slovak Republic(21 OECD
Countries)
Year Rank Value OECD Average
1993 17 40.3 54.7
1998 19 40.5 58.3
2003 12 60.7 65.2
Source Democracy Barometer, preliminary results.
21Overall Performance Cross-regime /
Cross-function Means
227th Step Research Perspectives Beyond Measurement
- Overarching question
- What is the (causal) link between institutional
designs and quality of democracy? - Which institutional design shows the highest
quality of democracy? - Is the quality of democracy a function of the
institutional design? - Which specific interdependencies in the quality
of democracy can be observed between the partial
regimes? - Changes of the democratic quality over time
(retrospectively) different developments? Which
components/functions particularly improved/
worsened? - Can the changes of democratic quality be
explained by changes of the institutional
designs?