CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE

Description:

chap. 3 : introduction to the hearsay rule p. janicke 2006 in general: witnesses are not allowed to testify to out-of-court utterances of themselves of others ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: paulja
Learn more at: https://www.law.uh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE


1
CHAP. 3 INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
  • P. JANICKE
  • 2006

2
IN GENERAL
  • WITNESSES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY TO
    OUT-OF-COURT UTTERANCES
  • OF THEMSELVES
  • OF OTHERS
  • DOCUMENTS CONTAIN STATEMENTS AND ARENT ALLOWED
    IN EVIDENCE
  • THEY ARE WRITTEN OUT OF COURT

3
EXAMPLES
  • WITNESS CANT SAY WHAT HE TOLD THE POLICE
  • LETTERS ARE INADMISSIBLE
  • POLICE REPORTS ARE INADMISSIBLE

4
RATIONALE
  • WE WANT WITNESSES TO TELL US FIRST-HAND ON THE
    STAND WHAT THEY SAW
  • CROSS-EXAMINATION IS AN ADVERSARYS RIGHT
  • E.G. THE CHEMIST FROM THE POLICE LAB TESTIFIES
    TO THE BLOOD TYPE

5
THE MAIN EXCEPTION TO WHAT IS HEARSAY STATEMENTS
OF OPPOSING PARTY
  • A PARTY TO A CASE CAN ASK A WITNESS WHAT THE
    OTHER PARTY SAID (IF THE WITNESS WAS THERE)
  • WITNESS CAN BE THE OTHER PARTY
  • WITNESS CAN BE A BYSTANDER

6
  • THE OPPOSING PARTYS WRITINGS ARE SIMILARLY O.K.
  • LETTERS
  • MEMOS
  • RECORDS

7
THESE ARE CALLED ADMISSIONS
  • ANY STATEMENT BY OPPOSING PARTY WILL QUALIFY WHEN
    OFFERED BY HER ADVERSARY PARTY
  • NO ANALYSIS FOR WHETHER ITS FOR OR AGAINST THE
    SPEAKERS INTEREST

8
OPPOSING PARTY MEANS THE ONE THE OFFERING LAWYER
IS AGAINST
  • IN CASE OF JONES vs. SMITH, JONESS LAWYER CAN
    INTRODUCE SMITHS STATEMENTS, AND SMITHS LAWYER
    CAN OFFER JONESS STATEMENTS
  • NEITHER SIDE CAN INTRODUCE ITS OWN OUT-OF-COURT
    STATEMENTS

9
TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH
HIGH UP
  • BENCH (JUDGE)

JONES
JURY
CLERK AND REPORTER
PODIUM
COUNSEL FOR JONES
COUNSEL FOR SMITH
RAILING
SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH)
SPECTATORS (FOR JONES)
10
TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH
HIGH UP
  • BENCH (JUDGE)

BYSTANDER
JURY
CLERK AND REPORTER
PODIUM
COUNSEL FOR JONES
COUNSEL FOR SMITH
RAILING
SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH)
SPECTATORS (FOR JONES)
11
TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH
HIGH UP
  • BENCH (JUDGE)

SMITH
JURY
CLERK AND REPORTER
PODIUM
COUNSEL FOR JONES
COUNSEL FOR SMITH
RAILING
SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH)
SPECTATORS (FOR JONES)
12
  • WHO THE TESTIFYING WITNESS IS HAS NOTHING TO DO
    WITH IT!
  • JONES LAWYER CAN ASK JONES WHAT SMITH SAID
  • JONES LAWYER CAN ASK SMITH WHAT SMITH SAID
  • JONES LAWYER CAN ASK A BYSTANDER WHAT SMITH SAID
  • JONES IS SAID TO BE OFFERING THE STATEMENT (VIA
    A WITNESS)

13
N.B.!!!
  • A PARTY CAN ALWAYS TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED
  • BUT NOT WHAT HE
  • WROTE DOWN
  • REPORTED BY PHONE
  • TOLD OTHERS ORALLY

14
  • A NON-PARTY WITNESS CAN LIKEWISE SAY ON THE STAND
    WHAT HAPPENED
  • BUT NOT WHAT SHE
  • WROTE DOWN
  • REPORTED BY PHONE
  • TOLD OTHERS ORALLY

15
GENERALLY, CAN A WITNESS TELL US WHAT PLAINTIFF
SAID?
  • YES, IF ASKED BY DEFENDANTS COUNSEL (THE
    ADVERSE PARTY)
  • NO, IF ASKED BY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL

16
ADMISSIONS IN THE CORPORATE CONTEXT
  • IF A PARTY IS A CORPORATION
  • STATEMENTS OF ITS OFFICERS ARE ADMISSIBLE (BY
    ADVERSARY)
  • STATEMENTS OF ITS EMPLOYEES ARE ADMISSIBLE (BY
    ADVERSARY)
  • STATEMENTS OF ITS LAWYERS OR REPRESENTATIVES ARE
    ADMISSIBLE (BY ADVERSARY)
  • ITS GENERATED DOCUMENTS ARE ADMISSIBLE (BY
    ADVERSARY)

17
EXAMPLES OF ADMISSIONS
  • DEFENDANT INTRODUCES POLICE LAB REPORT
  • DEFENDANT INTRODUCES POLICE CRIME-SCENE REPORT
  • PROSECUTOR ASKS ANY WITNESS WHAT D. SAID
  • PLAINTIFF INTRODUCES LETTER FROM DEFENDANTS
    EMPLOYEE

18
MORE EXAMPLES
  • PROS. CAN ASK A BYSTANDER WHAT D. SAID
  • PROS. CAN ASK A POLICEMAN WHAT D. SAID (IF HE
    HEARD IT)
  • IF D. TESTIFIES AT TRIAL, PROS. CAN ASK D. WHAT
    D. SAID

19
  • A VICTIM IS NOT A PARTY IN A CRIMINAL CASE
  • HENCE, VICTIMS OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS ARE
    USUALLY NOT ALLOWED TO BE INTRODUCED AT TRIAL
  • VICTIM CAN OF COURSE TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED

20
  • CIVIL CASE PARTIES ARE
  • PLAINTIFF
  • DEFENDANT
  • A VICTIM COULD BECOME A CIVIL PLAINTIFF, HENCE A
    PARTY
  • IN THAT CASE, THE DEFENDANT COULD OFFER THE
    VICTIM/PLAINTIFFS OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS

21
  • SOME OUT-OF-COURT UTTERANCES ARENT STATEMENTS
  • WORDS THAT ARE THEMSELVES AN ELEMENT OF THE CASE
    ARE NOT REGARDED AS STATEMENTS EXAMPLES gt gt

22
  • OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE (in contract case)
  • WARRANTY OF GOOD CONDITION (in warranty case)
  • DEFAMATORY UTTERANCE (in defamation case)
  • CHECK DRAWN ON A BANK (payment defense)
  • THE LEASE (in eviction case)
  • PERMISSION TO DRIVE MY CAR (theft defense)

23
  • SINCE THESE ARENT STATEMENTS, THEY ARENT
    HEARSAY
  • THEY CAN BE ADMITTED IN EVIDENCE BY EITHER SIDE,
    THROUGH TESTIMONY TO WHAT WAS SAID, OR, IF IN
    WRITING, INTRODUCING THE DOCUMENT

24
  • MUCH MORE ON THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY
    STATEMENTS, LATER IN THE COURSE !!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com