UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study

Description:

UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study Carol Haigh, Senior Lecturer in Research; Natalie Yates-Bolton, Lecturer in Nursing Martin Johnson, – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:101
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: caz49
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study


1
UK student nurses' education values a
three-centre study
  • Carol Haigh, Senior
  • Lecturer in Research
  • Natalie Yates-Bolton,
  • Lecturer in Nursing
  • Martin Johnson,
  • Professor in Nursing,
  • School of Nursing,
  • University of Salford, UK

2
What are Values?
  • A cognitive and emotional disposition towards a
    person, object or idea.
  • Attitudes are similar, but more specific.
    Measurement of attitudes can suggest strength
    that values are held

3
How are values adopted?
  • Genetic disposition (Dawkins)
  • Species altruism, Selfish Gene
  • Behaviourism and Social Learning Theory (Bandura)
  • Modelling and perceived reward/status
  • Existential/humanist (Raths)
  • Values chosen, freely from alternatives

4
Background
  • Gerard Fealy (2004, Irish Context)
  • Quotes from Attitude surveys
  • the nurse who is good at theory is rarely good
    at the practical side of nursing (McGowan 1980,
    p. 94).
  • university education was not appropriate for
    nurses (Scanlan 1991)
  • Underlying these views are values

5
Approaches to the study of values
  • Sprangers (1928) Types of men.
  • Theoretical, Economic, Aesthetic, Social,
    Political, Religious
  • Theoretical since the interests of the
    theoretical man (sic) are empirical, critical and
    rational, he is necessarily an intellectualist,
    frequently a scientist or a philosopher. (Vernon
    and Allport 1931, p233)
  • Allport, Vernon and Lindzey (1960) values
    instrument draws on this, used by several nurse
    researchers

6
Early studies of educational values
  • In a UK study Singh (1971) compared students on
    experimental courses (e.g. combined degree/SRN)
    and Diploma/SRN) courses with traditional SRN
    students but found no statistically significant
    difference on the theoretical value.

Experimental 29.96
SRN 30.24
Difference - 0.28
7
Singh (1971)
  • However when he compared experimental students
    (N 229) with non-nursing female undergaduates
    (N 147) he found a notable and statistically
    significant difference
  • (p lt 0.001)

Experimental students 29.96
Female undergraduates 33.80
8
In the USA
  • ONeill (1973) found the opposite (p lt 0.1)

Values General College Students N 1289 Nursing students N 459
Mean Mean
Theoretical 35.7 37.5
9
Research Questions
  • Do student nurses educational values vary
    between different universities?
  • Do educational values in student nurses differ by
    programme of study?
  • Do educational values in student nurses change
    across time?

10
Sample
  • 3 universities
  • Southern, Russell, Riverside
  • Pre-registration students (n1133)
  • Diploma n835
  • Degree n287
  • (11 missing responses on this variable)

11
Methods 1
William A Scott General Values Instrument (1959).
This is a Likert Scale Instrument measuring
general attitudes
Honesty Religiousness Intellectualism Self
Control Academic Achievement Independence
Altruism
Nursing specific items added which included the
Scott categories plus 2 other - Paternalism and
Authority
A sub set of variables focusing upon general and
professional educational values is the focus of
this presentation. We report on altruism and
honesty (Johnson, Haigh and Yates-Bolton JAN, 57,
4, 366-374)
12
Educational values subset - Scott
  • Reading only things that dont pose any
    intellectual challenge (S2)
  • Working hard to do well academically (S4)
  • Ignoring lectures and text-books that are
    difficult (S7)
  • Not letting studies interfere with ones social
    life (S24)
  • Striving hard to get the top marks in the group
    (S27)
  • Being interested only in ones work (S34)

13
Educational values subset - Johnson
  • Little has been gained by educating nurses in a
    University rather than a Hospital School of
    Nursing (J5)
  • Nursing should be a highly educated profession
    like Medicine and Law (J8)
  • Academic qualifications should not be important
    to nursing career advancement (J16)

14
Methods 2
  • Ethical approval obtained from participating
    organisations
  • Student questionnaire administered in class time
    20 minutes. Investigators not particularly
    involved with programme
  • Ordinal data was analysed using SPSS
  • Descriptive stats
  • Correlation
  • MANOVA

15
Demographics - Gender
16
Demographics - age ranges
17
Educational Demographics - NVQ
18
Educational Demographics entry level GSCE,O A
level
19
Educational Demographics - degree
20
Educational values relationships by university -
1
  • The relationship between university and
    admiration for those who do not let studies
    interfere with social life was investigated
  • There was a small weak negative statistically
    significant correlation between the two variables
    rs -.101 n 1133 p .001
  • This gives of coefficient of determination of 1
  • This suggests that students who attended
    Riverside university were more likely to admire
    this behaviour

21
Educational values relationships by university- 2
  • The relationship between university and
    admiration for those who strive hard to get the
    top marks was investigated
  • There was a weak statistically significant
    correlation between the two variables rs .202
    n 1133 p lt.001 giving a coefficient of
    determination of 4
  • This suggests that students who attended
    Riverside university were more likely to admire
    this behaviour

22
Educational values relationships by programme of
study - 1
  • The relationship between programme of study and
    admiration for those who strive hard to get the
    top marks was investigated
  • There was a small weak positive statistically
    significant correlation between the two variables
    rs .133 n 1133 p lt.001 giving a coefficient
    of determination of 1.7
  • This suggests that students who were enrolled on
    degree programmes were more likely to admire this
    behaviour

23
Educational values relationships by programme of
study - 2
  • The relationship between programme of study and
    agreement with the statement Nursing should be a
    highly educated profession like Medicine and Law
    was investigated
  • There was a weak positive statistically
    significant correlation between the two variables
    rs .104 n 1133 p lt.001 giving a coefficient
    of determination of 1.0
  • This suggests that students who were enrolled on
    degree programmes were more likely to agree with
    this stance

24
Educational values relationships by year of study
- 1
  • The relationship between year of study and
    admiration for those who ignore lectures and
    text-books that are difficult was investigated
  • There was a weak negative statistically
    significant correlation between the two variables
    rs -.166 n 1133 p lt.001 giving a coefficient
    of determination of 2
  • This suggests that third year students were less
    likely to admire this behaviour

25
Educational values relationships by year of study
- 2
  • The relationship between year of study and the
    variable little has been gained by educating
    nurses in a University rather than a Hospital
    School of Nursing was investigated
  • There was a weak negative statistically
    significant correlation between the two variables
    rs -.125 n 1133 p lt.001 giving a coefficient
    of determination of 1.5
  • This suggests that third year students were less
    likely to agree with this statement

26
MANOVA
  • Multivariate tests for statistical significance
    between groups by
  • University
  • Programme of Study
  • Year of study
  • Used Pillais trace as test of statistically
    significant differences between groups because of
    differences in sample sizes
  • Because this used multiple comparisons we applied
    a Bonferroni adjustment which gave a new
    probability value of .007

27
Working hard to do well academicallyDiploma and
Degree
admire
  • Overall students on both programmes viewed
    working hard to do well academically less
    positively by the third year. (Diploma M 4.78,
    4.74,4.70) (Degree M 4.85, 4.83,4.64)
  • Southern Diploma held opposite view in year 3 (M
    4.64, 4.60.4.79)
  • Impact on life long learning

28
Studying hard to get good marks in tests and exams
admire
  • Overall Diploma and Degree students viewed
    studying hard to get good marks in tests and
    exams less favourably in the third year.
  • Exception Southern Diploma students

29
Between subjects effects
  • For the sub set educational values
  • University accounted for 3.6 of variance
    (p.001)
  • Programme of study accounted for 6.1 of variance
    (pgt.001)
  • Year of study accounted for 3.2 of variance
    (pgt.001)

30
Conclusions
  • There were some variable specific differences
    between the student groups
  • There was values congruence across the diploma
    groups as there was across the degree groups
  • The biggest difference between the student groups
    was accounted for by programme of study.
  • For some educational values there was no evidence
    of improvement over time
  • Many students are leaving nurse education with
    less intellectual enthusiasm than with which they
    entered.

31
Thank you
  • Carol Haigh
  • c.a.haigh_at_salford.ac.uk
  • Natalie Yates-Bolton
  • n.yates-bolton_at_salford.ac.uk
  • Martin Johnson
  • m.johnson2_at_salford.ac.uk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com