I. Nature of Variation in Diet - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

I. Nature of Variation in Diet

Description:

/ Page 107 Chapter 5 ... to nutrient Total energy intake least ... of the relations 29 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:228
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: ibmsSini
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: I. Nature of Variation in Diet


1
I. Nature of Variation in Diet
  • II. Overview of Dietary Methods

2
I Introduction on dietary variation
  • There is day-to-day variation in dietary intake.
  • Long-term dietary pattern is used as the exposure
    parameter in epidemiologic applications.
  • Period of time
  • Years--- atherogenesis or cancer
  • Weeks--- fetal malformation
  • Days,weeks, or months---Physiologic intermediates
  • plasma lipids or endogenous hormone excretion

3
  • Feature of the dietary intake
  • variation from day to day superimposed on an
    underlying consistent pattern
  •  

4
  • Factors contribute to daily variation in dietary
    intake
  • Day of the week
  • ex large meals on Sunday/weekends
  • Season
  • in developing countries without food preservation
    and transportation systems
  • The magnitude of influence is largely determined
    by cultural and ecological factors.
  • Most of the variation in an individuals diet is
    without an obvious patternrandom variationtrue
    variation and measurement error(single day)

5
  •   The degree of random variation differs
    according
  • to nutrient
  • Total energy intakeleast day-to-day variation
  • Macronutrienta somewhat constrained possibility
    for large degree of variation
  • Micronutrientlarge variation
  • (Fig 3-1) vitamine Agt total fat,
  • related to the level of intake

6
(No Transcript)
7
  • (Fig 3-2) The consumption of a specific nutrient
    for a single individual(within-person variation)
  • (Fig 3-3) Distributions for mean daily intakes
    of total calories, total fat, and vitamine A for
    a group of 194 women(between-person variation)
  • (Fig 3-4) a sample of one or several
    days----artificially increase the standard
    deviation---misleading report

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
  • The variation in daily intake of specific
    nutrient
  •  
  • Daily Nutrient Yijkµ subjecti factor Xij
  • day of
    weekijk eijk
  • factor Xij factors that influence within person
    variance, such as season and day of the week
  • eijk random within person variance (day to day
    within person variance not explained by the other
    independent variables)

12
  • (Table3-2, 3-3) major contributors to variance
    subject (between person variance) and residue
    (ewithin-person variance)
  •  
  • Daily Nutrient Yijkµ subjecti e
  • e day to day within person variance
  •  
  • Within-person variance/between person variance
    gt1(Table 3-4)
  • within-person variance depending on populations
  • in U.S. (similar degree across age and age
    grouping)high within person varianceTable
    3-4,Table 3-5)

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
  • Seasonal variation
  • not apparent in U.S.,
  • probably more apparent in Taiwan or China than in
    US.
  • Year-to-year variation
  • minor in comparison with day-to-day
  • Within-person-variation random? dependent?
  • --homeostatic mechanisms (probably both
    physiologic and cultural)
  • -Autocorrelations(positive,negative)
  • --Those with higher mean intakes have greater
  • within-person variation.---transform data
  • --possible nonindependence of intake on
    consecutive days --- sampling days at random
    intervals.

18
II.  Number of days necessary to estimate true
intake
  • Calculation of number of days
  • (the degree of accuracy, the variability of the
    studied nutrient)
  •  
  • n(ZaCV?/D0)2
  • n the number of days needed per person
  • Za the normal deviate for the percentage of
    times the measured
  • value should be within a specified
    limit
  • CV? the within-person coefficient of
    variation
  • (SD/Mean)100
  • D0 the specified limit (as a percentage
    of long-term true intake)
  •  
  • (table 3-6CV)may vary among different
    populations

19
  • (example)
  • ---to calculate the number of days needed to
    estimate a persons cholesterol intake to within
    20 of their true mean 95 of the time
  • n(1.9662/20)2 37 days
  •   -----beyond practical possibilities
  • (Table 3-7)
  • CVs are different for various nutrients

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
III. Implications for developing countries
  • More homogeneousdeserves examination(foods
    limitedincome differencesincrease between
    person variation)
  •  
  • Within developing countries, lower economic
    status has been shown to be associated with
    higher within-person variation.
  •  
  • Less able to adapt to temporatory short falls in
    income. Influence of season, preservation and
    transportation---provide excellent opportunities
    for epidemiologic studies of the relation between
    diet and health.---measure the important
    components of variation, such as seasonal effect)
     

23
(No Transcript)
24
?????
  • ????(??????)
  • ????(???????)

25
????(within-person)??????????
  • ????(missclassification)
  • ?????????????????
  • ?????????
  • ??????????
  • ????????,????????,????
  • ???????,???????

26
????
  • ??????,???????
  • ????????,??????????
  • ?????,
  • ????????

27
IV. Effects of random within person variation
on measures of associations in epidemiologic
studies
  • Reducing the strength of association
  • correlation coefficients (example0.620.28),
  • regression coefficients (example0.120.01),
  • relative risks (example2.361.51)

28
Attenuation of the relations
Physiological variables
R0.96
R0.65








Dietary intake level
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
  • Methods to estimate true correlation
  •  
  • 1. To use large number of replicate measurements
    for each individual and use the average.
  • ---ex within 10 of the true correlation14
    repeats
  • 2. To make a small number of repeated
    measurements per subjects and use knowledge of
    the within-person variance (see Ch12).

32
Summary
  • 1. Day to day variation in nutrient intake has
    consistently proved to be large.
  • 2. The magnitude of variation varies according
    to nutrient.
  • 3. Measurements of dietary intake based on a
    single or small number of 24-hour recalls per
    subject may provide a reasonable estimate of the
    mean for a group, but the SD will be
    overestimated.
  • 4. Measurements of association (such as
    correlation and regression coefficients and
    relative risks) are weakened.

33
????/??????
  • Page 107
  • Chapter 5

34
??????
  • ?????
  • Duplicate portion technique, aliquote sampling
    technique, equivalent composite
  • ?????
  • ???precise weighing, weighted inventory, intake
    recorded in household measures
  • ???????,????,????

35
??????
  • Daily consumption methods
  • ?????
  • ?????precise weighing, weighed inventory,
    recorded in household measures?
  • ?????duplicate portion technique, aliquot
    sampling technique, equivalent composite
  • Long-term dietary pattern
  • ?????
  • ????
  • ??????
  • ???????

36
?????????
  • ?????
  • ?????,???????/24????
  • ?????
  • ?????
  • ?????
  • ????????24-?????
  • ?????????????
  • ????
  • ?????24-?????????????
  • ?????
  • 24-?????
  • ???? p133, section 6.6
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com