THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 62
About This Presentation
Title:

THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY

Description:

THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY Mariano ABAD MENENDEZ Principal Administrator General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union ORIGINS Fish are a natural, mobile ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 63
Provided by: imediterr6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY


1
THE COMMON FISHERIES POLICY
  • Mariano ABAD MENENDEZ
  • Principal Administrator
  • General Secretariat of the Council of the
    European Union

2
ORIGINS
  • Fish are a natural, mobile and renewable resource
  • Common resource

3
Why manage fishing?
  • 1) To ensure sustainability optimum balance
    between capacity and resources
  • If overfishing - risk of collapse
  • Other risks pollution
  • Objective MSY maximum sustainable yield
  • Greatest quantity of fish that can be caught
    without the stock being adversely affected
  • (provided that environmental factors don't
    change)

4
(No Transcript)
5
Why manage fishing?
  • 2) Treaties Article 3(1)(e) A common policy in
    the sphere of agriculture and fisheries
  • Article 32(1) The common market shall extend to
    agriculture and trade in agricultural products.
    Agricultural products means the products of the
    soil, of stock-farming and of fisheries and
    products of first-stage processing directly
    related to these products
  • Fish, crustaceans and molluscs

6
EVOLUTION
  • 1. Common measures in 1970 failure of success
  • Access to fishing grounds Equal not free
  • Markets
  • Structure modernisation
  • Increase safety
  • Improve hygiene conditions
  • Adapt to new fisheries
  • Facilitate adoption of new fishing methods
  • 2. The third UN conference on the law of the sea
    (UNCLOS) The EEZ
  • The Hague Resolution November 1976 asking MS to
    extend their fishing zones to 200 miles as from
    1.1.1977 of the North Sea and North Atlantic
    Coast

7
(No Transcript)
8
EVOLUTION
  • Within the EEZ zone each Coastal State has
    sovereign rights for exploiting, conserving and
    managing fishery resources.
  • There is an obligation to allow others to fish
    for any fish the coastal state can not exploit
    itself.
  • 3. 1983 First Regulation on conservation
    measures
  • Regulation 170/83. Amended on 1992 and again
    in 2002.

9
SCOPE
  • MATERIAL Conservation, management and
    exploitation of living aquatic resources and
    aquaculture, as well as processing and marketing.
    Fish, whether freshwater or marine, crustaceans
    and molluscs
  • TERRITORIAL Geographical scope is the same where
    the Treaty applies
  • PERSONAL EC fishing vessels or nationals of MS

10
EC fisheries management OBJECTIVESShort term
  • Ensure the continuation of stocks as a commercial
    viable resource
  • Decrease fishing effort in order to ensure stable
    yields from year to year - adapt fishing fleets
    to catch potential
  • Ensure highest possible catches

11
EC fisheries management OBJECTIVESLong term
  • Exploitation of living aquatic resources
    providing sustainable economic, environmental and
    social conditions.
  • The policy is to be based on sound scientific
    advice and on the precautionary principle.

12
TYPES OF MEASURES
  • TACs TOTAL ALLOWABLE CATCHES
  • Amount of fish that can be taken from a
    particular stock in the year in question.
  • TACs are divided into quotas allocated to
    individual MS

13
Criteria to allocate quotas
  • Article 20(1) of framework regulation
  • "Fishing opportunities shall be distributed
    among MS in such a way as to assure each MS
    relative stability of fishing activities for each
    stock or fishery".

14
RELATIVE STABILITY
  • Impossible to guarantee specific tonnages
  • Better to guarantee a specific percentage per MS
    relative stability

15
(No Transcript)
16
RELATIVE STABILITY
  • How were the percentages calculated?
  • 1) Past fishing performance average catches in
    the period 1973 - 1978.
  • 2) Hague preferences The needs of regions
    particularly dependent on fishing IE, Scotland,
    North-east coast of England
  • IE 2 x total landings in 1975 in all ports
  • UK Landings by vessels lt 24 m. in N. Ireland,
    Scotland and in ports of the North east coast of
    England
  • 3) Compensation for losses suffered as a
    consequence of the extension of fishing limits by
    third countries

17
RELATIVE STABILITY
  • The proportions used in 1982 became the
    "allocation keys".
  • They have to be reviewed after each accession of
    new MS.

18
Decision
  • The Council acting by qualified majority on a
    proposal from the Commission
  • MS decide on the method of allocation of their
    fishing opportunities among the vessels flying
    their flag. Subsidiarity
  • MS may exchange all or part of their fishing
    opportunities. Prior notification to the COM.

19
(No Transcript)
20
Quota taken
  • When a MS has exceeded the fishing opportunities
    which have been allocated to it, the Community
    can operate deductions.
  • The COM may immediately stop fishing activities
    once the respective quota has been exhausted.

21
Undesired effects from TACS
  • Keeping the bigger fish and throwing away the
    smaller
  • Discards Fish which are caught and immediately
    return to the sea because
  • less than the minimum legal landing size
  • in excess of quota limits or
  • no economic interest
  • Under-reporting

22
TYPES OF MEASURES
  • FISHING EFFORT
  • Product of the capacity, in tonnage or engine
    power, multiplied by activity expressed in days
    spent at sea by a fishing vessel.

23
(No Transcript)
24
TYPES OF MEASURES TECHNICAL CONSERVATION MEASURES
Basic aim Limit the capture of Immature
fish Unwanted fish Marine mammals, birds and
other species such as turtles
25
TYPES OF MEASURES TECHNICAL CONSERVATION MEASURES
  • Gear regulation minimum mesh sizes
  • Minimum landing sizes
  • Closed areas and closed seasons
  • By-catch limits

26
Minimum mesh sizes Minimum mesh sizes
OBJECTIVE CRITICS
Increase the yield per recruit by allowing small fish to escape Imperfect tool for fisheries management in a mixed, multispecies fishery
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Minimum landing sizes Minimum landing sizes
OBJECTIVE CRITICS
Discourage fishermen from using nets of less than the legal minimum and avoid areas where small fish predominate Although preventing the landing of undersized fish, it must be discarded. Rate of survival very low.
30
Seasonal bans Seasonal bans
OBJECTIVE CRITICS
Protecting juvenile fish by prohibiting fishing during the periods when they are abundant in the areas where fishing is banned. To be effective there should be a total ban on fishing
31
ACCESS
  • 1970 - Introduction of principle of equal access.
  • Against international trend to give exclusive or
    preferential fishing rights to coastal states
    over zones off their coasts.
  • Article 17 of framework Reg. EC fishing vessels
    shall have equal access to waters and resources
    in all EC waters other than up to 12 nautical
    miles from the baselines.
  • Exceptions
  • - 12 mile limit

32
ACCESS
  • - Shetland box
  • UK demand for preferential access in areas beyond
    its 12-mile zone. Needs of local fishermen.

33
(No Transcript)
34
LICENCES
  • Another way to limiting the fishing capacity
  • Since January 1995 all vessels operating in EC
    waters and all EC vessels operating outside
    community areas require a licence.
  • Conditions to be effective area
  • Fees? Yes in third country agreements.

35
2002 reform NEW MEASURES
  • Multiannual recovery plans
  • Target stocks outside biological limits
  • Management plans
  • Objective Maintain stocks within safe
    biological limits

36
Emergency measures
  • Competence MS or the COM
  • When?
  • A) COM in case of evidence of a serious threat
    to the conservation of living aquatic resources
    or to the marine eco-system resulting from
    fishing activities and requiring immediate
    action.
  • B) MS serious and unforeseen threat. Damage
    must be difficult to repair if measures are not
    taken immediately.
  • At the request of a MS or at the initiative of
    the COM
  • Duration 6 months 6 months / 3 months
  • Request addressed to other MS, the COM and
    relevant RACS.
  • COM 15 days to decide. It has to be communicated
    to the Ms concerned and publish in the OJ.
  • MS concerned can refer the issue to the Council
    within 10 days of receipt of the notification.
  • Council by qualified majority voting can take a
    different decision within one month of the
    receipt of the referral.

37
CONTROL and ENFORCEMENT
  • Without proper monitoring and effective
    enforcement, conservation would be threatened
  • MS are responsible for effective control,
    inspection and enforcement of the rules of CFP
    to inspect fishing vessels in their ports and
    waters to ensure compliance with management
    measures as well as ensure that the vessels
    flying their flag comply with Regulation in force
    wherever they operate.
  • The complexity of the task - difficulties to
    enforce
  • The area of the sea involved
  • The number of vessels and ports

38
Some elements to be taken into account
  • Nationality of the vessel
  • Location
  • Species being fished
  • Gear being used
  • By-catches
  • Minimum sizes
  • Log books
  • Licence
  • Reporting

39
INSPECTION
  • Lack of resources both at national and EC level.
  • EC inspectors The 2002 reform. They are
    competent to verify the implementation and
    application of the CFP rules by MS and their
    competent authorities.
  • Possibility to inspect alone vessels and premises
    and to have access to all information and
    documents necessary. make available the
    inspection report to the MS concerned who is not
    obliged to act on the basis of that report.
  • No police and enforcement power no powers going
    beyond those of national inspector.

40
(No Transcript)
41
INSPECTION
  • Penalties are a MS competence. There no standard
    sanctions at EC level. They may include
  • a) fines
  • b) seizure of prohibited fishing gear or catches
  • c) sequestration of the vessel
  • d) temporary immobilisation of the vessel
  • e) suspension of the licence
  • f) withdrawal of the licence.
  • Serious infringements The Council is to
    establish a catalogue.

42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
Preventive measures
  • The Commission may take preventive measures if
    there is a risk that fishing activities may lead
    to a serious threat to the conservation of living
    aquatic resources.
  • They must be proportionate to the risks.
  • Duration In principle three weeks and up to 6
    months.

45
The way forward
  • 1. The Control Agency
  • Created in 2005 and to be located in Vigo.
  • Objective Organise operational coordination of
    fisheries control and inspection activities by
    the MS and to assist them to cooperate so as to
    comply with the rules of the Common Fisheries
    Policy in order to ensure its effective and
    uniform application.

46
The way forward
  • 2. The use of technology ERS and VMS
  • VMS
  • Provides reports at regular intervals on the
    location of a vessel providing information on its
    speed and course.
  • Vessels gt 18 m. 1.1.2004
  • Vessels gt 15 m. 1.1.2005

47
THE EXTERNAL DIMENSION
  • Implied powers ERTA case - in its external
    relations the Community enjoys the capacity to
    establish contractual links with third countries
    over the whole field of objectives defined in
    Part One of the Treaty.
  • Hague Resolution of 3 November 1976 Council
    agreed that the Community entered into agreements
    with third countries to allow fishing by vessels
    from those countries in EC waters as well as
    fishing by EC vessels in third country waters.
  • The EC competence to enter into treaties is
    exclusive as regards conservation and management
    of fisheries. In other areas, there could be a
    mixed competence (i.e. UNCLOS)

48
THE EXTERNAL DIMENSIONPROCEDURE TO NEGOTIATE
AGREEMENTS
  • 1. OUTSET
  • The European Commission requests a mandate to
    the Council which sets out the guidelines
  • The Commission negotiates on behalf of the EC.

49
THE EXTERNAL DIMENSIONPROCEDURE TO NEGOTIATE
AGREEMENTS
  • 2. END OF THE DISCUSSIONS INITIALING
  • 3. SIGNATURE OF THE AGREEMENT AND PROVISIONAL
    APPLICATION
  • 4. CONCLUSION OF THE AGREEMENT AND ENTRY INTO
    FORCE

50
BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
  • Non-reciprocal access The surplus.
  • USA, CANADA fish and chips.
  • Greenland payment of financial compensation and
    the admission of fishery exports from Greenland
    free of customs duties.
  • Developing countries Obligation to land, at
    least a part of their catches, in the ports of
    the third countries concerned and employ as crew
    fishermen from those countries.

51
BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
  • Reciprocal access Norway, Iceland, Faroes,
    Russian Federation
  • Vessels are required to carry a licence and are
    subject to the fisheries jurisdiction of the
    other party when fishing in its waters. Foreign
    vessels must comply with conservation and control
    measures in other party waters.

52
REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS
  • Objectives
  • Regulate fisheries
  • Cooperate with coastal states on the management
    of the stocks which migrate between the coastal
    state EEZ and the area beyond.

53
(No Transcript)
54
REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS
  • Obligations of MS within the framework of those
    conventions Kramer case.
  • MS can not only not to enter into any commitments
    which could hinder the Community in carrying out
    its tasks but also to proceed by common action
    within the Fisheries Commission.

55
(No Transcript)
56
REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS
  • Shared stocks Main issues
  • 1. Identifying joint stocks
  • 2. Agreeing on conservation measures
  • 3. Allocating catches
  • In case of no agreement, each party sets
    autonomous TACs.
  • Implementation of fishery measures adopted by the
    Commissions is not automatic it requires EC
    Regulations.

57
DECISION MAKING-PROCESS
  • PROCEDURE TO ADOPT THE ANNUAL TAC QUOTAS
    REGULATION

58
How to improve the procedure?
  • RACs
  • Objective advise the COM on matters of fisheries
    management in certain sea areas or fishing zones.
    They may be consulted on respect of measures to
    be adopted on the basis of Article 31 of the EC
    Treaty.
  • May submit recommendations or suggestions
  • Inform the Com about problems concerning the
    implementation of Community rules

59
  • Composition fishermen, representatives from the
    fisheries and aquaculture sectors, environment
    and consumer interests, scientists from all MS
    having fisheries interests in the areas
    concerned. Representatives from the national and
    regional administrations have the right to
    participate as members and the COM may be present
    at the meetings.
  • Number of RACs
  • Baltic Sea (operational since March 2006)
  • Mediterranean Sea
  • North Sea RAC (operational since November 2004)
  • North-western waters (operational since September
    2005)
  • South-western waters
  • Pelagic stocks (blue whiting, mackerel, horse
    mackerel and herring) in all areas (operational
    since August 2005)
  • Distant water fisheries

60
THE MEDITERRANEAN
  • Most fisheries take place in the coastal band and
    involve a high number of small vessels.
  • Most Member States have not extended their
    exclusive fisheries limits beyond territorial
    waters.
  • The EC is member of the General Fisheries
    Commission for the Mediterranean and the
    International Commission for the the conservation
    of Atlantic Tuna.

61
THE FUTURE
  • MSY ?
  • Communication from the Commission on implementing
    sustainability 5 July 2006
  • World summit on sustainable development.
    Johannesburg, 2002 Maintain or restore stocks to
    levels that can produce MSY, not later than 2015
  • Fishing at MSY levels greater of large fish in
    the catch.

62
THE FUTURE
  • How to achieve it?
  • 1. Reduce the proportion of fish captured
  • 2. Decide on the annual rate to achieve the
    objective
  • 3. Decisions to be implemented through long term
    plans
  • 4. Periodic review
  • Two economic strategies to be taken at national
    level
  • A) Economic efficiency Reduction of fishing
    capacity
  • B) Limit the vessel's capacity to catch fish or
    days at sea.
  • First measure to be applied with effect on 2007
    management measures should not increase the
    fishing rate for any stock that is already
    overfished.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com